Was 8.1 the last good version of Windows?

>>52332428

No, that was Vista.

No that was windows 2k, no activation needed. Widows 8.1 was the last version without botnet.

>>52332428
it's just a worse version of windows 10

>>52332428
No. That was MS-DOS

>>52332455
>vista
thats a weird way of spelling windows 7

>>52332546
This. It basically has the same botnet but without the actually good WM of 10.

In my opinion they should have kept Windows XP and kept optimizing it and made it a rolling release like 10 is supposed to be now.
I'm using 10 now and am happy but fuck man the world would be a better place if we all were still using XP.
/blog

No. Win 8.1 is just as broken as win 10. If it wasn't for jardware support I'd still be using XP or 7.

No, that was ME.

File: 1451361728569.jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

74KB, 640x640px

>>52332428
>Windows 3.1

File: 1389239278625.jpg (15KB, 285x249px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

15KB, 285x249px

DOS

File: 1452379833389.png (179KB, 541x551px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

179KB, 541x551px

>>52332616
>>52334889
>being so underage you think MS-DOS is Windows

File: 461.png (339KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

339KB, 680x680px

>>52334905
>being so underage you think MS-DOS is not Windows

>>52332428
Yes