decode
- Home
- Board: /g/ - Technology
- Reading: decode
DECODE THIS PLEASE THANKS
qqdqdquq7q81219173v1d1713v11371537'1f3fm13if13fv13f'1f'313fl13f1!!!@20e28g2v27 d2012>!211d1212!>@!@12d2i81 122]eg 3r189r Q3X G23R39HE F809FWF49794809- 313fl13f13Y 24824 2482428424824@$@424 24@$@$@f$fn$o$hh)#@hf{@f@@ 032F F3f@f@( 2N2un@}-F92F un@}
It's someone banging on a keyboard
>>52228343
OP is a faggot
There decoded.
lamborgini
>>52228343
Hey OP, I decoded it for you:
[spoiler]HERE IN MY GARAGE KNOWLEDGE LAMBORGHINI[/spoiler]
>>52228431
MENTOR
Okay, so I ran this through a hexidecimal-bilateral derivative redistributor which rendered an output value which seemed to be nothing at first. But then I converted each numeral of the value on the Suku Mibehalls system of numeral rendering to produce a string of 0's and 1's (binary). I then multiplied this string by the intergral's derivative of the original value and came up with a huge value which I instatly recognize as being convertible to morse code. After completing this gruling step, I took every signal from the morse code and mapped it to a new image in GIMP, assigning a color value to each single morse signal. The result was pick related
stfu about taylor guys it was just on my pc and i had to select a file so i selected this
"Okay, so I ran this through a hexidecimal-bilateral derivative redistributor which rendered an output value which seemed to be nothing at first. But then I converted each numeral of the value on the Suku Mibehalls system of numeral rendering to produce a string of 0's and 1's (binary). I then multiplied this string by the intergral's derivative of the original value and came up with a huge value which I instatly recognize as being convertible to morse code. After completing this gruling step, I took every signal from the morse code and mapped it to a new image in GIMP, assigning a color value to each single morse signal. The result was pick related"
So any translation
LAMBORGHINI
LAMBO
broke the rules
>>52228449
But the image isn't the actual decoding. I think you missed a crucial step which threw you off-course; try deriving the rotational velocidencity from the super-dense cluster results of OP's initial message. I bet you'll come to some different results.
