FFFFUUUUUUUUUU
this is why adblock should have never went mainstream
>>52212989
>News is the first rough draft of history
God what a horrible quote
>the banner is exactly the size of where normally the ad would be
>it has an annoying and intrusive color
>it's not helping at all
>>52212989
>websites dislike ad block
>don't spend time trying to find ways to bypass it
>complain instead
>>52213183
>he's not using the anti-adblock-killer list
>>52212989
>>52213252
This.
OP confirmed totally a faggot
>>52213287
Kek
>>52213260
It still shows up. It's not as if it works for every website.
I just went there now.
>>52213383
Update your list then you cuck.
If that fails, link please, I'm interested.
>>52213183
That message's selector is
###header > .adblocker.toast.block > .block-content
it's like they're not even trying
I wonder why the word 'adblock' isn't in the default filter list
I installed umatrix and have been adblock free since.
To access forbes, all I did was enable scripts from i.forbesimg.com as it was blocked by default.
>>52213287
it redirects you the that same page again you mong
People that use an ad-blocker will simply not use that site.
They aren't gaining any more ad revenue and loosing traffic.
are they dumb?
>>52213399
Not the guy you're replying to but with the updated filter list and greasemonkey script Anti adblock killer isn't working for me anymore.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/12/28/us-voter-database-leak/
>>52213634
and then the site adds a div to the top of the page breaking every single one of your filters
>>52213670
I have no ads / anti-adblocker messages on that link and I'm not even using greasemonkey.
>>52213724
I don't get any messages, but while the continue button worked with uBlock origin enabled three days ago, the continue button no longer works.
>>52213619
this
I've left porn streaming sites because of this shit. their loss, not mine.
Alright here's how to do it OP. Block everything temporarily that is not forbes.com and forbesimg.com.
I use ublock and I block by default 3rd party scripts and frames.
>>52212989
>redirects me
>"pls turn off adblocker"
>do nothing
>"thank you for turning off adblocker"
>get to target page as normal
What was that about?
OP Seems to be using an inferior adblocker. I get neither that message in the welcome screen, nor banner placeholders with an intimidating message. µBlock Origin with the custom filters: "Adblock Warning Removal List" and "Anti-Adblock Killer".
>>52213670
>greasemonkey
No. Use ublock origin, go to the list of optional filters/lists, and find the anti-adblock-killer one and enable it.
>>52212989
No problems here.
UBO + noscript.
>>52213670
There two anon.
>>52213935
You're supposed to use the aak filter together with its script
>>52214015
Don't bother, works great without it.
>reading forbes
>tfw uBlock Origin
>tfw Anti-Adblock Killer | Reek
Never saw one of those.
>>52212989
I can smell you, you /biz/ nigger
daily reminder that only communists block ads
>>52213619
They don't have to pay for bandwidth for visitors that they aren't collecting money from.
They don't get anything from you looking at an add free site.
>>52214232
They get popularity
>>52214013
>firefox mobile
how is that not inconveniently laggy?
ublock origin, umatrix and someonewhocares.org/hosts reporting in.
first time visiting this site, i don't see the adblock notice and the 'continue to site' button just werks. op is retarded.
>>52214319
>believing memes
>>52214415
>meme
I've tried it myself and the scrolling is laggy as fuck
>>52214319
You can use extensions, unlike Chrome.
>>52214349
You really only need ublock anon
>>52214319
>>52214415
>>52214503
just installed it again and the lagg is gone
>>52214531
I bet you work at tech support
>>52214201
Daily reminder that only capitalists artificially restrict capabilities if money is not in the right hands.
>>52214319
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ installed it like two months ago and I noticed no difference from the chrome browser, even with ublock.
>>52212989
>not having anti-ad blocking lists added to your ad blocker
>>52212989
This got me salty as fuck too. Thanks Forbes, you just lost a viewer.
>>52212989
>Forbes
Who cares.
![jux7c[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/TtQV9rz.jpg "jux7c[1].jpg")
I don't get this meme
>>52212989
Just use Ghostery, cuck
>>52217877
>using adblocking by an ad company
>calling others cuck
Top irony anon.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/cf9c7af428f125e6f8b0a3ab512c1e4550a26ec0
thank mr gorhill
>>52213489
now click it again
>>52220396
Nice.
>>52214319
Have literally never noticed lag with it.
>>52220396
This is why adblock will always win.
Forbes probably spent a few thousand dollars of man hours in dev and qa hours for some anti-adblock code that only existed for maybe an hour before it was blocked again.
I doubt they'll try that again.
>using sites with anti-adblockers
>ad-light
I like how they blatantly try to downplay their shit.
>>52213183
you probably want ublock origin. though its shit a blocking ads you can definitely hide it. That's what ublock excels at.
>>52219907
lemme ask you something would you rather wipe your ass with a company that makes toilet paper or a company that makes sandpaper. im pretty sure ghostery is developed by an ad company but that makes it so much better. the company knows how to track which means they can also come up with ways to untrack. a lot of people would shy away from ghostery but that shouldnt be the case. they should be shying away from these nobodies that make "open-source" products with absolutely no experience. i highly recommend ghostery.
>>52213183
>Hij leest een Nederlandse nieuws site in het Engels
For what pvrpose?
>>52212989
Why not just use a script blocker? Are you that autistically offended by ads that you simply never want to see them, even those ads that are just static images?
>>52212989
>still bothering with sites who want to infect you with spyware
there's no reason to not block the forbes site and just forget about it.
