daily reminder linux does fuck all to protect against cpu microcode backdoors
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
>>52196728
Explain, how is it compared to Free/OpenBSD?
>>52196843
look up yarrow
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
I don't use linux because it is superior.
I use it because it is free as in freedom and the people who develop on it contribute to the project, not just taking the system because it is open source.
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
>>52196843
or i guess it's fortuna now
>>52196871
Having fun?
>>52196843
They are even worse. NSA confirmed backdoors even before the Snowdon leaks.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/15/openbsd_backdoor_claim/
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/12/did_the_fbi_pla.html
>>52196904
>openbsd
not freebsd.
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
>>52196860
>i use inferior software to support people who create inferior software
>>52196881
yes thank you
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
fuck me daddy
>>52196904
That was an accusation that was never proven. The alleged backdoor was supposedly planed 15 years ago by ex openbsd developers and it was never found by the current team. Right now, It's all FUD.
>>52196965
*planted
>>52196923
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
Security in linux in general is a joke. Linus' attitude towards security may have been acceptable and easy to work around a decade ago but is seriously out of touch now. You can't so easily dismiss it as tinfoil type fears anymore. Governments and private businesses rely now more than ever on maintaining secure systems filled with personal data.
>>52196904
I have a hard time imagining the FBI/NSA trying to put backdoors in BSD but not in Linux. I seriously don't see the point, BSD is not nearly as popular as Linux for servers holding sensitive data.
>>52197104
And the fact the entire team independently reviewed it and nobody found anything makes me also skeptical about the backdoor claims.
>>52196949
thanks dad
my friend asked me if there a unfree binary blobs in bsd?
is it true?
>>52196776
>>52196810
>>52196827
>>52196855
>>52196871
>>52196923
>>52196947
>>52197039
>>52197063
>ninefoldfag
