Lets talk about Encryption.
I'll start with an easy one.
Can I still use Truecrypt, from what I understand, the audit didn't find anything wrong with the security, but the entire project is defunct right?
If not. Options? No. Not using bitlocker. Fuck that.
>>52146697
SSL is pretty an NSA Tool.
how do you go on the net securely on Debian?
>>52146697
dm-crypt if you are on linux, otherwise truecrypt 7.1a is best
>>52146811
/Thread
>>52146811
OP here. It's for a flash drive with personal shit on it.
Not for the NSA or anything, but more for if I lose it.
Can I used dm-crypt for that?
I'm assuming OS doesn't matter in that case.
I'll probably put together a partition on my OS too though. That will be windows based.
>>52146941
Just use bitlocker you special fucking snowflake. You'll never be safe from your NSA/illumernati boogeyman as long as you insist on running windows anyway.
>>52146941
Yes, it can do that, just make sure you format it in NTFS before you encrypt it.
>>52146697
in my opinion cryptolocker is the best.
>>52146697
I personally use Veracrypt, a fork of Truecrypt, most.
>>52146697
truecrypt (7.1a) is fine. veracrypt fixes some minor issues (nothing that breaks encryption) and adds more security, mostly by doing more iterations of some operations, slowing attackers down some more.
legit download source: https://www.grc.com/misc/truecrypt/truecrypt.htm
for loonix, dm-crypt/luks
>>52147147
Or an x86 processor.
>>52148208
>doing more iterations of some operations, slowing attackers down
Sounds like an obfuscated backdoor, I would stay away from veracrypt until some third party audit it, for now its just the fork the nsa always wanted with built-in botnet.
