Reminder: Functional languages are the only languages worth using.
Reminder: If you aren't using a functional language, you aren't a programmer, just a code monkey.
Reminder: If you try to fight the functional tide, you will be deemed nonfunctional and eventually swept aside.
Reminder: There are only three acceptable programming languages: Haskell, F#, and OCaml. LINQ is also passable if you're a newbie.
Reminder: Go is not a systems language. However, Haskell is.
What are you working on?
>LINQ
>a programming language
Ayyyyyyy
>Haskell, F#, and OCaml
The syntax for all three of these languages suck for actually writing applications.
Reminder: kill yourself back to /pol/ with your reminder meme.
>>52080248
Define the "functional language" faggot. There is no accepted definition. Everything can/is functional language.
>>52080248
i remember that i had haskell in college as the example of functional language, and had to do a lot of shit with it.
however, 20-30 line programs are the furthest we got, and when shit got hard in the end i just copied the homework from a friend
>>52080631
This.
And how are you suppose to use Linq without using C#. I'm sure it can be used in VB.Net and might also in F#.
What's the point.
Linq is more like TSQL then any functional languages I've seen.
>>52080248
No clojure? You are a complete faggot?
>>52080248
While I agree that Haskell, F# and OCaml are syntactically the best languages, I think you've made a dire mistake omitting Lisp (and especially Typed Racket).
Clearly you don't understand your roots.
>>52081828
Is Prolog functional?
Is java functional?
>>52082511
We used common Lisp at college and I liked it, after that we had logic based programming and I couldn't get into that at all. So I didn't do the homework (we need to do only 50% of the homework and I already did that by doing all Lisp homework)
>>52080248
>Haskell
>systems
>Go
>not systems
>no mention of Erlang or Elixir
