The iPhone 6S is more powerful than the note 5 or 6p
>>52038348
Yes, it uses a chip that is more than 6 months newer than both of them and is also clocked higher.
>>52038348
And this would affect your Facebook shitposting how, exactly?
>>52038373
Note 5 was released in September and has a chip which is as new as the one in the 6S.
Samshill BTFO.
>and twice as costly
>>52038416
It uses the same chip as the S6 that was released in April you stupid cunt.
Who cares?
Games run the same way on a shitty moto g and a iphone 6s.
Also
>720p
>>52038460
Enoxsys 7420 in S6
Enoxsys 7422 in Note 5
>>52038520
No, exynos 7420blazeit on both
Same camera same everything, 6 months earlier, yet it beats the 6s
>>52038520
>Enoxsys 7422 in Note 5
nigger what?
i've got a note5 sitting right here that says otherwise.
>>52038460
lmao retard
>>52038680
meant that for >>52038416
>>52038348
>worse multi-core score
>can't even install a 4chan app on it
Vulkan is coming to android
Also you need like 1000 on single core on geekbench to run everything out there
>>52038410
>today
>Fandroid: damageControl.c
>6 months later
>Someone posts that $androidPhone is more powerful than iPhone 6s
>AppleAcolyte: damageControl.c
>Fandroids proceed to "lel" "apple cuck" "go suck tim cook's cock some more" etc.
The Circle of Life continues.
>>52038745
History always repeats itself.
Who gives a shit? It's a phone.
>>52038745
I hold no allegiance to any OS. I just want to know how these numbers affect OP's day to day activities. The answer is: they do not. Still, I want to hear his story.
>>52038779
Steve Jobs touched OP when he was a child and now he has Stockholm Syndrome.
>>52038508
Whats wrong with a moto g?
Its waterproof exelent battery good performance an okay screen
>>52038348
And it still is unable to download a simple mp3 and open it in the music app lol
>>52039447
I'll never understand why people say windows is worse than ios.
>>52039401
>waterproof
Wrong
>excellent battery
Wrong
>good performance
Wrong
>>52038348
But it still runs IOS so what's the point
>>52040664
shitposting
>Got cardboard.
>Have S3
>Nothing runs app wise, can barely even run cardboard youtube videos.
All I want is my VR porn and psychedelic apps.
>>52038348
can someone please tell OP that the numbers 4545 and 5328 are bigger than 4460.
also:
>apple used less cores than their competitors.
apple didn't make a faster cpu, they just used a different core count. if samsung decided to use less cores they could beat apple's single core performance but android prefers more cores while iOS prefers single threaded performance.
>>52043092
Yeah because multicore score totally matters way more than single core as relevant to day-to-day performance
>2 flagship android phones
>running significantly different android versions
god android get your fucking shit together.
>single core performance is what is important because apps dont use multiple cores!
Say the fags who don't realize that Android will actually utilize all available cores for all apps.
>>52043855
You're mom also uses multiple cores at once, lol
>>52043092
if we're looking at both scores, the amount that the iPhone is behind the android phones in multicore performance is relatively small (4480 vs 5330, in the "worst case" where we compare the better of the android scores).
the difference in single core performance flips the other way, but the difference is proportionally enormous compare to the spread on multicore performance. 2550 versus 1480 (in the best case) or 1320 (in the worst case) is a massacre.
>>52043867
She's a talented woman.
>>52043840
Huh? Its a nexus device, it gets android versions immediately, the other is a Note5, which has already had a build leak and is going to rollout the 6.0 update in the next few weeks to all note5 owners. It's only been ~2 months since 6.0 launched, most other manufacturers are only just now getting 6.0 updates out as well, for samsung this is pretty quick. It used to take 6 months or more sometimes.
>>52043880
>had a build leak
>update in the next few weeks
>been ~2 months since 6.0 launched
>for samsung this is pretty quick
>used to take 6 months or more sometimes
I don't like iOS but this is all such transparent apologist bullshit that it's a little embarrassing.
How bout that VR for iPhone? oh wait...
>>52043872
Fact is, though, that Android will utilize multiple cores for everything. You can see this if you install Perfmon and enable the CPU display.
One or two cores will always be active while the device is on, but if you launch an app usually all the rest will ramp up and they'll all be active when the app is processing.
The only apps that won't utilize multiple are ones that do very little processing and ones that are set to specifically be single threaded, of which there are relatively few.
The multicore score might not be important for iOS but it is for Android.
>>52043899
How so?
Looking at previous android updates, 4-6 months after it launched on nexus devices it would trickle down to other manufacturers devices.
2 months aint bad at all...
>>52038458
/Thread
>not using windows phone
stay autistic
>>52038373
>but it's fine when others do it to the 6 month old iPhone
>synthetic benchmarks
Remember when people said the same about the iPhone 6 and nexus 5?
Yet the 1 year old nexus 5 still outperformed the new iPhone 6 despite losing in benchmarks.
Come back when you've got a side by side comparison of real world usage.
>>52043984
You shouldn't have to wait for trickle down economics to take effect on software updates. it's only because we don't know any better that we seriously think this is a good situation - certainly better than it used to be - for mobile operating systems.
android users are like kids who think that being neglected by their parents 5 days a week is standard practice for parenting. with no frame of reference, they honestly think that having to work with leaked builds, waiting months for new operating systems to trickle over to their devices, and seeing devices released just a few months earlier getting relegated to second class status is all totally normal.
it's not. this is fucking awful. when iOS updates to a new version you know on day 1 whether your device is getting that version entirely, partially, or not at all. and since iPhones tend to come out once a year, it's unlikely that anyone will buy a device and find 6 months later that their flagship phone is already a second class citizen.
What's new?
>>52044069
there's no way to make replicable real world usage tests. anything you standardize becomes a target for being "too synthetic". companies learn to optimize for whatever the test does because it's routinized.
if you're asking for a touchy feely side by side comparison, you're not going to find one. maybe MKHBD (or whatever tech nigger's name is) has what you're looking for.
>>52044067
Didn't say it was but you seem to be using that as an excuse.
>>52044121
We are actually in a better situation now.
The top Android makers are pushing out security updates monthly now. My phone, which is more than a year old and doesn't have 6.0 yet, has the December security update which means that it has the same security patches as Nexus phones that have 6.0 and are also on the December security update.
The security updates may not have gone back to older devices but going forward this is a better position than we have been.
>>52044121
Nexus gets updates like ios though so your argument against Android is negligable.
Other OEMs need to fix the update to work on their devices because they're not stock vanilla android and have to update a variety of devices which is why it takes longer.
>>52044140
Synthetic benchmarks don't mean shit. Until I see a side by side comparison of the devices being used I'm not believing shit.
>>52044292
>We are actually in a better situation now.
yes, better than the shitshow we were in for like half a decade. that's like going from being actively abused by parents to merely being neglected most of the time. we get patches for issues that threaten core security but any features people would look forward to get in line like it needs to be rationed out.
this is exactly the kind of apologist shit i'm talking about. stop meekly trying to justify this; iOS for all of its shit doesn't leave 90% of its users wondering whether and when they'll get their updates.
>>52044311
>Synthetic benchmarks don't mean shit. Until I see a side by side comparison of the devices being used I'm not believing shit.
so like literally seeing someone using both devices side by side in an 18 hour video of daily use?
i don't know what to say. being autistic must really debilitate you.
>>52044365
Just 5 minutes of common usage.
Open facebook scroll up and down a bit.
Open internet browser do a couple of searches.
Just open a bunch of apps and use them for a few seconds.
No need for 18 hours, but for autsists like you, I'm sure basic mathematics must be a mountain to climb.
>>52044425
you understand that various approaches to caching would influence repeated checks of facebook, internet browser, etc... right?
and the "nuh uh, you are" shitposting really suits you, autist.
>>52044480
I don't give a shit why one is faster than the other.
Stop posting synthetic benches and show real world usage, fucking shill.
>Hurr durr my iPhone cpu is 2% faster
That's so fucking significant.
https://youtu.be/q2Hx3dOP9xI
>>52043855
>being this much of a pathetic weeaboo
>>52044609
Holy shit dude, are you actually retarded?
>>52044719
Nope.
Synthetics don't mean shit.
Ios != android.
Just because one processor benches slightly better than the other doesn't mean that phone is faster.
Real world usage > any synthetic benchnark.
>>52040892
Sent from a useless OS
Reminder that soon samshit will BTFO literally everything
http://hexus.net/tech/news/cpu/87524-jim-keller-reportedly-joined-samsung-chief-architect/
>>52044719
>posts proof that synthetic benchmarks are not equivalent to what the end user experiences
>Better call him a retard.
This is the average apple shill.
>>52039889
>waterproof: Always take it in shower/pool
>exelent battery: át least 5H screen on time
>performance: smooth AF with normal use
>screen : good enough
Dont Judge a phone by its price and some 10 year old saying it sucks
>geekbench
are you serious though? Use antutu and see how better it is than the alternatives. Protip, it's not. S6 and note 5 can be tweaked to go beyond 120k.
>>52043876
for you
What does these numbers means?
You need like 1000 to run everything on everyday, right? Why do you need more nambhas? These synthetic benchmark shilling is getting worse than megapickle wars
...who cares...
>>52038778
Holy shit this.
Nobody's going to fold proteins on them.
>>52038348
>deactivated all animations on my old as fuck xperia zr running lollipop
>feels fast as fuck
>>52038745
trying way too hard tbqhwyf
>>52043817
>>52043092
So I assume you both use amd cpus as well...
>>52048831
I'm being sarcastic you dipshit
>>52038348
Breh it's a known fact Apple always has the best hardware the best android phones are still using iPhone 5s technology pic related
>>52043855
>playing garbage irrelevant mobage
lol
>>52049524
But what do these numbers mean to you, specifically?
