what is the easiest way to interpolate video files to 60FPS?
webm related
>badcosplay.webm
horrible cosplay
Is cosplaying at anime cons just a way for women to get tons of male attention? It seems like all they do is pose for pictures and flaunt their bodies.
>>51973656
>implying women just do it for fun
>>51973583
interpolation probably
>>51973583
Shoot them at 60fps to begin with. Most video eqipment made since the 1940s does 60 or 50hz of full motion.
If it's old footage (that's interlaced) you might be able to recover the full 60fps if you get the original interlaced files.
>>51973656
for the most part, cosplay girls are always really awkward or homely or grotesque without all the costume shit
the fetish-wear masks their flaws but any close ups usually ruin the illusion
>>51973583
MUH TEST
U
H
T
E
S
T
>>51973583
Lookup the Smooth video project.
>>51973736
>homely
>grotesque
Do you read asoiaf?
>>51973583
you don't.. you shoot it at 60fps natively or else it'll look like shit when you fake frames
>>51973832
>>51973583
this, even soon with a linux prot
>>51973583
>what is the easiest way to interpolate video files to 60FPS?
Why?
Full video of this?
http://bluesky23.yukishigure.com/en/AsVideoConv.html
with amd fluid motion
>>51973583
>webm related
That was shot at 60fps, I know because I shot it.
Also does anyone know of any good stabilization software or plugins?
>>51974128
>because i shot it
ok brehsef
>SVP 4 released
>it just works
>have to purchase advanced controls and stuff
JUST
>>51974200
Also don't ask, the rest of it looks like it was shot by a guy with parkinsons
>>51973814
HIGH
I
G
H
TEST
E
S
T
>>51974255
Can you post all the videos?
>>51974567
Maybe when I get around to stabilizing them
>tfw could use OBS to screen record MPC HC for 60 fps webms
>cant now for some reason
>>51973583
Is that asuka in the back? I'm much rather see her than whoever this is supposed to be.
more 60
>>51974991
how
I want to touch a girl
>>51973583
>black bra
9/10 it's the best I can do.
>>51975012
don't we all, anon?
>>51973583
virtualdub+interpolation filter
but it doesn't do a very good job.
>>51975012
i want to at least look at a 3d girl
>>51974128
I've used Blender to do 3pt stabilization, however that's probably not as straightforward as you'd want.
>>51975012
why on earth would you desire that
>>51974991
>trying so hard to look cute.
7/10 for effort
>>51974708
Doesn't YouTube automatically stabilize videos now?
>>51975012
I'll touch you anon. I hear those Oculus Rift headsets are coming out so we won't know the better.
That's not interpolated, you can easily tell since it's not horribly blurry. Don't interpolate video before distribution, it's much better to ship a low fps video and have the end user interpolate it if they want than to permanently interpolate it in a way that may not be ideal in the future. Shipping unmodified source files is always ideal especially with something like this were improvements are being made all the time.
>>51975071
I should have replied to this one as well >>51974708
The same can be said for stabilization.
Don't. It looks awful. Shoot at native 60 or fuck off.
>>51974991
Who is this cock commander?
everything needs to be shot at 60fps tbqh
why are luddites always holding back progress smdh
i came here for webms of busty girls in skimpy cosplay costumes.
where are my busty girls in skimpy cosplay costumes? The skimpier the better. The busty-ier the better.
>>51975127
>YFW PORNSITES ARE THE TRUE DRIVERS OF VIDEO STANDARDS
LITERALLY THE BIGGEST CONTENT PRODUCERS
10BIT 2160P 60FPS
>>51975169
JUST
>yfw no matter how much you play with smoothmotion anime will never look this fluid
weebs btfo
>>51975127
we are getting so close to real time frame rate
>>51975186
Yeah but the only fluids that concern said weebs dried out and encrusted their old socks a while ago.
am i the the only one who wants to see "the slowmo guys" sue their camera to do a cumshot video?
100000 FPS or whatever it is
>>51975216
SAVAGE
A
V
A
G
E
>>51975169
This has always been true. Thank god for porn. Porn and anime, strangely enough. Weebs are even more cutting edge.
VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, dropping DivX, h264, 60fps, VR, the porn industry is the true innovator.
>>51975224
yes
>>51975250
weebs tried to push 10bit video.completely fucking retarded.
>>51975224
That's gay, senpai.
But it will happen one day. A porn company will get a hold of a high speed camera and create wonders with it.
>>51975312
you don't understand why 10bit encodes of an 8bit source are beneficial when deal with tvrips/streamcaps, and that's fine--but it's late at night and I have to go to bed so I can't explain it to you. But believe me: it's a valid technique to obtain the least lossy compression on smooth gradients.
>>51975322
>>51975224
Pretty sure Lars Von Trier or Gaspar Noe already did it. If they didn't they'll probably be the first.
time to fap
>>51975335
Lars Von Trier is a fucking nutjob, I'd be surprised if he hasn't tbqhwyf.
>>51975169
I have absolutely no idea why people say this. Porn is AWFUL quality. It's all low-quality streams.
They love gimmicks. They sure adopted 4K and 60 FPS quickly. But it looks like absolute shit since they don't want to pay for the bandwidth.
>>51975312
A 20% reduction in bitrate for the same quality is retarded?
>>51975620
>My free porn was a low quality stream
I did not expect this to be possible.
>>51973583
who is this semen demon
>>51975620
>A 20% reduction in bitrate for the same quality is retarded?
That's not how it works. It does a much better job at reducing banding (which is typically VERY obvious in anime) and other details at the same bitrate though.
>>51977780
will smith
>>51974991
Who is this jizz jezebel?
>>51973865
> FAT
> PINK
> MAST
But seriously still better than 20 good men™.
>>51973583
she's fat..
>>51978023
she's HEALTHY
>>51978062
Actually thinner means healthier.
>>51978023
A good fat. But it does disgust me the way her underwear is visible. Not that I want to see her goods, rather it just doesn't look good for the cosplay overall. Nonetheless she has an open invitation to sit on my face.
>>51978365
>But it does disgust me the way her underwear is visible
Yeah, it's too 'in the face', but I'm always fine with a more subtle peek.
>>51978335
Not always. In OP’s webm, she simply looks healthy.
>>51974708
Baka nigger sentai baka
>>51978399
retard
>>51978411
Baka retard sentai baka
*fixed
Can't ffmpeg convert 25 fps to 60 fps?
>>51974991
Xev Bellringer
>>51978525
My fucking heart.
>>51973583
Hnnnng.
Who bitch is this?
>>51975012
Go to a day care
>>51978666
This'n
Sorry for sideways, mobile
>>51978525
>vertical video
>>51975312
10bit helps with banding and/or saves bandwidth.
>>51977802
>That's not how it works.
but it does. h.264 does not not have enhanced internal precision compared to output bit depth. 10bit processing and then just shaving off the extra bits via quantization gives you higher internal precision, thus less noise caused by rounding errors and thus higher encoding efficiency even for 8bit content.
http://x264.nl/x264/10bit_01-ateme_pierre_larbier_422_10-bit.pdf
>>51978365
>>51978379
well the actual cosplay is no underwear
>>51978365
it's insufficiently form-hugging.
>>51974708
where are those fucking videos?!
>>51974991
>>51975127
>>51978023
Where can a poor anon find some free 60fps porn?
>>51979917
Literally google.
>>51981730
Fucking anon doesn't deliver. Just another day here at 4chin.
>>51982146
He made it pretty clear that he didn't think it was high enough quality for release
>>51975127
>>51975169
>>51975212
>>51982686
This is correct for a very specific use case: if the director wants to achieve the "filmic look", they should shoot at 24fps and optimally on actual film. For computer animation, home movies, "reality" television, anime (it's true), and pornography, the higher the framerate the better.
>>51974128
Literally after effects senpai
>>51982841
Don't claim a spoof as a correct fact. The "cinematic" effect was a tech limitation that nowadays is still accepted due to two things as simple as 90% of displays still displaying from 50hz to 60hz maximum and the brain being used to watching it since we very young.
https://youtu.be/mjYjFEp9Yx0
Once the current unfortunate "standard" is left back and the new generation has high frame rates everywhere, the "cinematic" effect will be looked at as an idiocy of their ancestors.
>>51983972
The hell are you talking about? 60hz displays can display 60fps. Did you just watch the video you posted and not understand anything in it?
>>51973583
>>51974708
sause name identification doxx pls
>>51984117
You're missing the point.
Watch a 60fps footage on a 144hz display and tell me there is no difference.
It's about the same difference as a 24fps footage on a 60hz display, almost everyone will say it's fine if it's a movie but not if it's anything else. What magic lies there asides of the brain being used to it? And don't give me the uncanny valley as that was what the first people watching movies also claimed.
Let alone the soap operas, comparing unprocessed footage of soap operas under pain spotlights to films that are processed to hell and back with colour filters and brightness (no, i'm not talking about special fx) is just retarded.
>>51984340
No idea what you're trying to get across. 60fps on a 144hz display is still going to be 60fps. The only difference will be a higher motion resolution on the 144hz display in most cases but this is just a fault of LCD displays being sample and hold. It will actually look smoother on a Plasma or a CRT unless you enable ULMB mode.
>almost everyone will say it's fine if it's a movie but not if it's anything else.
Because other things don't have motion blur from a 180 degree shutter. It's not comparable.
WHERE IS THE TIT
YOU SAID THERE WOULD BE TIT
>>51984418
all we need is tit identification
>>51984402
And 24fps on a 60hz monitor is still 24fps, so? Does is still look good? I'm too lazy to find that webm of a film with the camera panning and rotating in the forest, that shit doesn't fly even on a 50hz interpolated.
>>51973583
furry in the back ground
>>51984514
That shot is from Noah and it looks bad because of the cinematographer being incompetent or lazy about it. Slower pan, adjusting the shutter angle, etc. Also that webm doesn't help because it has a bunch of compression.
You can make 24fps look smooth like higher framerate. Remember that movie Public Enemies? It got the same sort of criticisms from people like it was shot in a higher framerate but it wasn't. All Mann did was use a 360 degree shutter angle so all the light in every frame was captured.
>>51979456
Not what you interpret as underwear. But Mai isn't bare underneath.
>>51984675
Being lazyness or incompetence, it's still dancing around the same limitation, there shouldn't be an excuse even if you are correct because the technology is here for a very long time now. everything advances obviously for better except this because reasons.
>>51984941
Thing is people act like it's so clear cut when it isn't. Some scenes may benefit from a higher framerate but there are many scenes where the look just doesn't fit the scene and can detract from it. Saying it's inherently better shows a lack of knowledge about film. Take for example the famous opening scene in Saving Private Ryan, it's known for the staccato effect Spielberg used to give you a sense of the chaos in the scene.
Framerate needs to be used as a tool, just like Trumbull attempted, not as something considered superior overall.
>>51984836
He means the bra senpai
>waaahh high frame rate looks bad because I'm not used to it
Can we kill these luddites so technology can finally progress?
>>51985113
That is a good example although it doesn't exclude high frame rate, it could still have the high frame rate alongside the effect.
I feel like pic related as if people do not notice the blur, stutter and small actions being done in micro teleports on the so called "cinematic" experience.
>>51985164
interpolated 60fps is pure fucking trash.
I accidentally torrented 60fps version of Gladiator.
And got nauseous after ~5 minutes of the opening battle scene
HFR is superior
>>51985164
Tech isn't the only thing that needs to progress. HFR made The Hobbit seem fake, actors looked like they had makeup on and the CGI looked PS2 FMV tier. That's with $200 million dollar budgets.
Same idea with porn. It really stands out how terrible the makeup and lighting is in 4k
>>51985268
... Proceed with the rest.
>>51985307
blue board m8
>>51985268
source
>>51985307
:^) a source would be wecome as well, or that qt's name.
>>51985289
>HFR made The Hobbit seem fake, actors looked like they had makeup on and the CGI looked PS2 FMV tier.
And props actually looked like rubber props.
HFR will make cinema different.
Excessive camera movement (as popular as it is in normal movies) in 60fps makes you puke.
So the camera will be static but the actors and stuff will be moving in front of it.
More like a theatre i suppose.
>>51985289
The hobbit looked like shit at normal frame rate too.
>>51985343
Title metadata
>>51985365
>The hobbit looked like shit at normal frame rate too.
But HFR looked worse. It'll be interesting to see how Avatar will turn out. Supposed to be 60fps.
>>51985289
now that's what I would call pigdisgusting
>>51985365
thanks anon
>tfw 60 fps youtube has desensitized me
I remember a year or two ago when I first saw it and it was mind blowing
I want that feeling back :(
>>51985268
>>51985268
bitches name?
Here you go.
http://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/
I use this for porn. Don't recommend it for anything else, especially TV shows/movies, because the effects look super cartoony and silly.
>>51973583
You can just create frames, it'll look like shit
>>51985441
can't*
>>51973583
>>51985528
DELETE THIS
>>51985268
>>51985339
Oh come on. At least a name or something to go off.
>>51985528
Did a side by side comparison using a movie
Couldn't tell the difference between one using this deinterlace mode and the other running the default one
>>51985568
>>51985430
look up Ashlynne ecg
>>51985600
Checked with FRAPS
VLC is running at 24 fps with both
>>51985629
You need to enable deinterlacing as well after changing the deinterlacing mode.
>>51985640
Well shit, you're right
Runs at 48 FPS now
Still doesn't seem much different
>>51985663
Yeah, it's not like pure 60 (or 48) fps. It mostly helps with the panning scenarios (which look awful even at 30fps).
>>51978023
>she's fat..
are you gay?
>>51985756
No. She's fat.
>>51973583
SVP
>>51985358
>Excessive camera movement (as popular as it is in normal movies) in 60fps makes you puke.
i'm sure they'll find a way to add that in post. shot at a wider angle, then crop or whatever.
or slightly smoother shakes.
>>51985268
ty anon, the whole video with her is so fucking amazing, one of the best pron i've ever seen for sure
>>51977780
>>51978666
>>51984210
where are we on titcow identification - not for me 'tis for a friend
>>51978822
so you'd rather watch a horizontal video and not see her cute legs?
>>51987246
this desu f4m
>>51985663
the video needs to be interlaced to make any difference
that's deinterlacing, not interpolation
