>>51947501
Privacy Badger is useless if you have uBlock Origin.

Also, the "trifecta" would probably be uMatrix + uBlock Origin + HTTPS Everywhere.

>>51947928
Self destructing cookies too, unless one of those addons can do the same thing.

https://www.privacytools.io/

what about betterprivacy for flash super cookies?

File: 49240.png (182 KB, 1078x311) Image search: [Google]

182 KB, 1078x311

Fix'd

>>51947928

If I'm blocking all scripts and third party frames in uo, what use does uMatrix have? It just seems to be too fine grained.

>>51947954
That depends on how you use SDC.You can *kind of* set up uMatrix to be SDC-like. You can block cookies by default and just allow cookies on a per-site basis. But you can't have have it allow all by default and then delete them automatically after you close the tab. So SDC is still preferably to most users, unless you block cookies very aggressively.

>>51948036
uMatrix is indeed more fine grained. But it's also easier to unbreak sites with it, since you can just allow one particular domain like a CDN instead of temporarily unblocking 3rd-party altogether etc. It also includes some additional features in the Privacy tab.

>>51948021
It's almost 2016.
Just stop using Flash you idiot.

>>51948058
>you can just allow one particular domain like a CDN instead of temporarily unblocking 3rd-party altogether

Doesn't uBlock Origin allow you to do that too?

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide

>>51948141
Well yeah but you can easily allow only CSS for example without automatically allowing everything else from said 3rd-party.

Basically Dynamic Filtering is babby's first content blocker. uMatrix is what grown ups use.