16:10 is way better on a phone than 16:9. Wish more phones besides the Nexus 4/G2 had it.
>>51928535
i think OP is a shitposting faggot, that's what i think about it.
fucking advertisers and their fucking surveys need to fucking fuck off already.
>>51928535
Good job cencoring the names, idiot.
>>51928535
> 16:9 = shit
> 16:10 = ok
> 4:3 = great
> 1:1 = godtier
What aspect ratio do humans see in?
>>51928643
good question, probably a circle?
>>51928787
>>51928643
It's not probably some super wide screen
Maybe 4:1
>>51928626
> 1:1 = godtier
gb2/instagram/
![en-INTL-Surface-128GB-MQ2-00001-RS-SP32[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/K7wczIS.jpg "en-INTL-Surface-128GB-MQ2-00001-RS-SP32[1].jpg")
>>51928626
3:2 masterrace checking in
>>51928643
>What aspect ratio do humans see in
>>51928787
>>51928885
4:3 ratio mimics human eyesight visual angle of 155°h x 120°v, that is 4:3.075, almost exactly the same.
>>51928535
Seriously? Censor their username but not censor the one in the comment
>>51928927
Except it isn't. Not even if the screen is touching your nose.
Source: my nose, it has touched A LOT of screens before.
>>51929105
My bad, I forgot we see out of our noses
>>51929162
Silly anon, the eyes are on the sides and the nose in the center. How else would you see what's in front of you?
Also, it's not by chance that when people hit something in the center, it's called on the nose. Then they figured out that bulls have an eye in the center and called it bullseye.
>>51929105
holy fuck 10/10 shitpost
literal lol.
>>51928535
Take a class in censoring, you mongoloid fuckface
>>51928535
What's up Liam you cunt?
