the i5 6600k? or the i7 4790k?
>>51921825
Are you stupid or are you retarded?
These are your choices.
>>51921825
4790k is faster than 6600k, and 6700k.
>>51921902
even for just strictly gaming?
>>51921854
you want me to buy an ayymd?
If you are going to be gaming, the 6th Gen absolutely rapes all other gens, I'd say i5-6600k OCd to 4+ghz (the highest I've seen is 4.8) or the i7-6700k OCd to 4.5+ (I've seen people get to 5ghz), but if you don't plan on overclocking, just go for the i7-6700k, but beware, my friend bought one and his is back ordered til february. Hope I helped.
>>51923378
>overclocking a 6700k for gaming
Not worth it at all. The performance increase is literally nonexistent.
>>51923409
Yeah, I've seen those charts as well, but overclocking the i5-6600k almost puts it on par/better than the i7-6700k. That's why I got the i5 one, not the i7 one.
>>51921825
the 6600 is not HT, but has better(5% ish) per core performance.
old games will like 6600, new 4790k
>>51923423
But then you can OC the 6700k and it's equally better again.
apples to apples.
>>51921854
I miss being 12 + verbally retarded
i5 6600k unless you're doing something more than gaymen,in which case get the i7 for the hyperthreading and everything.
