what is objectively the best hardware for a pc
How the fuck does that even make any sense
>>51880462
these nuts op, these nuts
>>51880982
>>51880462
was I being too -
Definitely the Nvidia GTX 980ti (imported from the republic of gamers)
A human; without which the pc would be useless.
>>51882122
That is just your opinion, and is subjective. There is no objective reason why a pc needs to have good graphics at all.
>>51882139
There is no objective reason why a PC should be used at all. Using the PC will just deteriorate the hardware and expose it to risks and potential errors.
>>51880462
u install dis, and u be god.
>>51880462
The best is SPARC radiation-hardened microprocessors such LEON4.
>>51880462
Depends on what you're doing for said PC.
Say you work with VSTs and DAWs, a high end graphics card would be useless, whereas a CPU with high clock speeds and a large cache would be far more useful. RAM with very low latency also helps.
If you play vidya, obviously a high end GPU and CPU is needed, but you don't need as much RAM because the majority of vidya don't use more than 4 or 8 GBs. 16 GBs of RAM should be more than enough.
Video editing requires pretty much everything to be top notch.
Then with HDDs and SSDs, using a SSD for the OS is always beneficial, and you always want your HDDs for storage to run at least at 7200 RPM. But I would recommend putting your more resource hungry applications on a SSD.
But if we are like you and just shitpost on image forums, we just need Windows XP 32 bit (SP1 of course) with an AMD Duron CPU using an integrated motherboard video card utilizing several WD Green HDDs in a full tower.
>>51880462
Hardware is constantly being worked on all the time. The best will with time become surpassed by something else
>>51880462
Seungyeon~
>>51880462
she looks retarded
Top of the line xeon, faster the better. More cores the better. Start with the best motherboard for accomodating the cores. Load it up with the most memory you can. SSD. and an additional for virtual memory.
