Heatsinks
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Why does everyone hate this little guy?
Will I be called out if i still use it
>>51875536
Yes, i'm calling you out now. Fuck off, faggot.
The only one who can prove you are a faggot it yourself
>>51875536
i love heatsinks, i do not hear them
i turned mine into an ashtray.
only buying WOF versions of cpu's now
How dumb. Heat rises.
Get a real heatsink
>>51875536
For normal use with a lower tdp processor they are "ok".
I personally prefer when the cpu runs cooler.
The other downside of those coolers are that they are louder and have those fucking push pins clips.
>>51875934
>poo
It does the job.
It is loud however and you may like your processor a bit cooler but if you use something like a 4460 and don't mind that detail it's sufficient.
Still a better cooler doesn't cost much either so when you have some spare change you could, you know, change that.
>>51875536
this is what i would use to make sure the cpu and computer work, usually just motherboard, ram and disc drive for a knoppix boot, once it boots, ill install the rest... no point in going further if something is broken.
that said, im on stock phenom II 955 heat sync... to be fair that was a pretty damn good heatsync but you could easily do better with sub 50$... that said i would still go with a 100~$ air cooler, may as well get the best of the best...
i also dont trust water coolers at all.
>>51875536
The stock one isn't that bad if you're not overclocking, have good airflow and don't live in a desert. Also replace the paste on it cause the stock intel shit is really bad.
>>51876206
I live in Australia which is close to a desert
Best cheap ass HSF?
No it´s fine OP, why bother replacing it.
After all, if you pay for something, it's a meme
>>51876269
All the 120mm single tower coolers are the same really - just get one with a good fan.
Got two sitting in the closet.
What can I even use them for?
I've got mini itx case what's a good small cooler for that
>>51876217
Do you have central air and insulated walls/windows?
This IS my heatsink, OC to 3.7ghz, never have had an issue in the 5 years of owning the processor
>>51875536
I've been using it the past several months and it can handle a 4.1 oc on my 4670k
>>51876339
I live in a shitty apartment where running the air con for long periods is too costly. So I have 2 fan running in my computer room
Ive been using the stock heatsink for over a year now, with fans barely turned on..
games run fine.. everything runs fine
>>51876206
>Also replace the paste on it cause the stock intel shit is really bad.
This...The same applies to AMD. Anyone who says the paste that comes with it is fine is wrong. Having the paste smothered all over the heat sink creates heaps of air bubbles. My CPU ran 10 degrees Celsius cooler when I reapplied it properly with a decent compound.
>tfw intel is so jew they halfed the size of the heatsink over the years and even took off the copper plate on some
>>51875536
Op is a faggot!
Use what ever the fuck u want none of us give a single fuck
If you are worried about heat or if that cooler is going to be enough in your setup then u have a retarded way of asking
>>51876419
And here's stock heatsink for Skylake
It's only $41 top kek
>>51876296
why is google not able to fetch images from 4chan for reverse image-searching?
MOOO- wait CHINKFUCK DO SOMETHING.
![21107293889998_609[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5Fnkjhq.jpg "21107293889998_609[1].jpg")
>>51875536
The older ones and thick ones went up to 6000rpm, and those were loud.
The new thin ones can't even break 2500rpm running full tilt are are pretty quiet, TDP and heat output has come down a long ways.
Heck the old thick P4 heatsink with the copper slugs is enough to overclock a haswell or skylake with a cheap $3 push pin to backplate+screw conversion kit.
>>51876508
You can't recognize a Hyper 212? CM shills don't work hard enough
>>51876518
>too*
>an*
Retard
>>51875536
My buddy has one of these on a 4790k it thermal throttles just turning on
>>51876536
doesn't change the fact that google can't fetch images from 4chan anymore.
>>51876419
At least you actually get a good CPU though.
>>51876604
Intel hasn't made a good CPU since Sandy Bridge
The Core and Nehalem days were god tier you underaged c.u.c.k
>>51876686
>Intel hasn't made a good CPU since Sandy Bridge
And yet they've still be far better than the garbage AMD has put out since Phenom II
>>51876604
What good is a CPU with a shit cooler? Jewing out on the heatsink reflects poorly on the company.
>>51876686
I believe cuck is uncensored now.
>>51876784
well baka testing desu senpai
>>51876770
>Jewing out on the heatsink reflects poorly on the company.
Well you better start shitting on AMD as well then because theirs are worse than Intel's.
>>51876801
Wrong
>>51876784
cuck
>>51875536
There is nothing wrong with intel heatsinks, they get the job done, its just that there are far better alternatives out there
>>51876717
So I guess nobody makes good CPUs anymore?
>>51876717
>garbage AMD
if you want as many cores as possible for the least price, AMD is the way to go.
You can buy a 150$ AMD chip with like 8 cores, which is absolutely perfect for tasks like 3D rendering and transcoding media
>>51876941
Even at stock an 8350 is an absolute monster for certain workloads.
>>51876941
>in before intel shills start claiming hyperthreading is the same as more cores
The pins must be put on, and especially taken off, in an extremely specific way. You only have one chance to learn and the pins are extremely delicate and can easily break. If you actually read the manual they don't even mention the right way to do it. Nowadays even prebuilts come with a gap in the back where the CPU is exactly for this reason which was the only point of having expanding push pins - to save you the time of taking the whole motherboard off - which makes this thing obsolete.
>>51875912
And OP already demonstrated he is a raging homosexual
I don't know AMD ones but Intel's are absolutely fine if you plan to use stock clocks. Whether it's too noisy for you or you want below avg temps on your CPU, that's a matter of preference. You don't really NEED to replace it.
>oy vey change the cooler on your i3 for better fps!!!!!
jews: the thread
really can't believe NO ONE itt has posted the link yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8IgbfFJ0tI
I hate these coolers with a passion, loud as fuck, hot as fuck, and the fan isn't the common 8cm or 6cm, why the fuck didn't they go with 8cm, it's so fucking hard to find a good 7cm PWM fan.
![3088798300_1339361850[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/jJkFAiT.jpg "3088798300_1339361850[1].jpg")
>>51877876
>>51876335
I have a Noctua nhl12. Just werks.
They're designed to be functional and to keep your CPU within specification temps when running at fully stock settings.
If you're an enthusiast at all then they should only be temporary, like you have everything in your build except a proper CPU cooler. It's fine to use for a month or two while you save up for a good cooler. Otherwise, the noise will drive you insane.
If you're not going to overclock just keep the stock cooler. Unless you're on AMD, then you're fucked. Their stock fans are noisy as heck.
>>51877876
>>51877885
I recently bought this fan and it's pretty good:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835426040
Right now it's cooling my original Xbox
>>51877885
AMD is such a good company, i would buy their CPUs and GPUs just to appreciate them, but its a pity the benchmarks say Intel and NVIDIA are better, i fucking hate Intel and NVIDIA for all the shit they pull off just to sell their stuff, but i value my money too
>>51877926
That is because the 8350 stock fan is a delta fan and WILL cool the chip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3mCpblX7zs
>>51877940
>send higher voltages through AMD fan
>it flies away
I have the 212 evo even though I don't overclock, god damn, the lower noise is worth every cent, it sounds like it literally doesn't change the sound going from idle to 100%, while the stock AMD cooler sounded like a vacuum cleaner and was at least 10C hotter
>>51877938
Good company? This has to be bait. They made their money selling knockoff Intel designs from the beginning. They are so incompetent they have to outsource any new CPU design, and then when they have something remotely competitive, management and marketing collaborate to kill the project. The whole company is a joke, and was only "good" when Intel got complacent and tripped up. Intel is a god tier company from the start. CRUSH the "competition".
>>51877940
put- put your dick in it
>>51877979
>>51878028
I actually destroyed one of those fans while using it as a way to cool my mobo vrms - the mounting I had rigged up came loose, the fan dropped (while spinning at over 2000rpm iirc) and shattered half of its blades against the vrm heatsink. That was an educational sound to hear (followed by panic as I shut everything down and pulled pc apart to find the shards).
>>51878009
You're speaking from a business POV. To consumers, Intel is a shitty company. They intentionally gimp their CPUs and sell microcode "upgrade cards" to make more money. Skylake was supposed to be part of the "tock" cycle, but only gave a small percent increase in performance. Again, to scrape money out of consumers.
It's only like this because AMD isn't laying on any pressure. The 8350 is considered old tech now, it's 32nm and can serve as a space heater. And of course, the 9xxx CPUs are a joke that even the hardest AMD fan can't defend. If AMD released Zen six months ago and made it competitive against Skylake, you can bet your ass that Intel would be introducing a new wave of drastically higher performing Skylake CPUs.
>>51878098
>you can bet your ass that Intel would be introducing a new wave of drastically higher performing Skylake CPUs
Cheaper just to bribe OEMs and the EU. They got away with it last time and probably would do so again.
>>51878009
>>51878141
>Intel is a god tier company from the start.
kek who do you think ruled the CPU market in the 80s? It was AMD
kek who do you think ruled the GPU market until late 90s? It was AMD
kek who do you think gimped their compiler to perform worse on AMD CPUs even if AMD hardware was superior? It was intel
kek who do you think paid Dell not to sell AMD CPUs from 2006 to 2009? It was intel
Give this a read
>http://hackaday.com/2015/12/09/echo-of-the-bunnymen-how-amd-won-then-lost/
>>51878098
it's this kind of bullshit that makes me seriously question modern capitalism sometimes. Not pure unfettered capitalism, mind you, but capitalism as it is envisioned these days by most governments and people.
It's quite obvious that if you took Intel to court as an effective monopoly (which they are) and split them into two competing companies with new management on both sides, you'd immediately see big gains in the CPU arena. Huge, even, as they'd have each other's tech and would be forced to innovate in order to differentiate and avoid a fight to the bottom.
I pretty much blame patent law for the way Intel behaves right now. There will always be a DEMAND for CPUs; someone will make them whether their rights are respected or not, because there's money to be made. But only because of patent law can Intel (or any other company that's made it to the top on its patents) sit around and get money for nothing.
>>51877938
This
I have an Intel+nvidia computer but i cant say i approve of their shady shit marketing practices and their moral-less approach to business.
>>51878166
>http://hackaday.com/2015/12/09/echo-of-the-bunnymen-how-amd-won-then-lost/
>From 2003 until 2006, Intel paid $1 Billion to Dell in exchange not to ship any computers using CPUs made by AMD.
>Intel held OEMs ransom, encouraging them to only ship Intel CPUs by way of volume discounts and threatening OEMs with low-priority during CPU shortages.
>Intel engaged in false advertising, and misrepresenting benchmark results. This came to light after a Federal Trade Commission settlement and an SEC probe disclosed Intel paid Dell up to $1 Billion a year not to use AMD chips.
fuck man intel is pretty dirty
I dont even use the official LGA 2011 stock cooler for my Xeon. I had the choice of: passive copper w/ a jury rigged fan on top, a legit active server heatsink with a 9000RPM delta on it, or a $20 Xigmatek heatsink.
I went with the Xigmatek
>>51877934
>19.8 CFM
That has like half the airflow of the stock fan
![Intel-Core-i3-and-Pentium-Ivy-Bridge-LGA-1155-Retail-Heatsink-Fan-Top[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ABKocgx.png "Intel-Core-i3-and-Pentium-Ivy-Bridge-LGA-1155-Retail-Heatsink-Fan-Top[1].png")
>>51877940
Intel has "Delta" fans too
Intel sources fans from Delta, Nidec, Foxconn and Fujikura, I have a sample of all four variants.
>>51877691
>>51877691
No wants to watch some faggot talk about shit he barely understands.
>>51878570
intelshill-kun, is that you?
>>51878569
Yeah and that fan moves half of the air the 8350 fan does. Though I suppose I was more referring to the reputation delta does for their ear-shattering fans rather than any specific model.
>>51876416
My 6500 runs 20-25 idle,and 70-75 on full load (100%, 30 minutes) with stock cooler and paste. I tested it with BOINC btw.
>>51878673
Run IBT at normal and watch it fry.
>>51878697
I still want to use it anon.
>>51878605
Delta also makes the intel stock heatsink Model FHS-A9020S01
Which is a 2900RPM 73.74CFM model 40dBA and 130W of thermal dissipation
The delta fan on the FX is the 6400rpm 46.64cfm version at 51dBA
>>51878697
For god sakes IBT or p95 should not be used on a haswell or later series CPU, even a Hyper 212x turbo will hit 80C and thermal throttle like shit.
AVX2 tests can kill CPUs and if you have voltage set to auto or adaptive, it will overvolt.
>>51877885
friend works for pc part shop, and they assemble for a fee.
he's a good guy and replaces stock low tier amd coolers with spare fx coolers that were replaced with aftermarkets.
gets a lot customers since pcs he makes are silent and frosty cool.
can't do that with intels :(
>>51878697
IBT is thermally destructive to Haswell and later CPUs. Their dies are too small and AVX2 instructions too hot running to run like that for any length of time without either overheating like a motherfucker and throttling, or frying.
>>51878959
I know that feel, I do it myself. AMD coolers are cooler master brand, which is also nice as I have some faith in that company's build quality.
>>51875536
I love them, I use them all the time on LEDs as they are next to free.
>>51878966
There is a reason why its known as Haslel around here.
>>51878991
AMD sources coolers from AVC, Coolermaster and Foxconn with AVC being the most shitty of the three.
>>51878959
A larger fan that tops out at 2200rpm or 3000rpm will most of the time be quieter than a 6400rpm one, especially when made by the same company like Delta.
>>51879230
well, I've recently purchased the following CPUs:
- Athlon 5350
- Athlon 860K
- FX-6350
and I've recently sold the following found coolers:
Phenom II X4 965 cooler
Athlon II X3 stock cooler
Athlon II X4 stock OEM cooler
and only the OEM was not obviously cooler master; I figured they just did that because the chip was bought w/o cooler and then a foxconn was dumped on it by HP or summat.
>>51875990
>in
Best method of applying thermal compound? Pea, line, X?
>>51875536
uh, because it sucks
>>51875934
anything aside from the stock heatsink requires too much effort for the average /g/ster
they can't be removing backplates from motherboards and lining up all kinds of brackets.
better to just slap on the cheapo and fire up counter strike as soon as possible
![maxresdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ak5qXpc.jpg "maxresdefault[1].jpg")
>>51879325
Good for you, and here's a picture of the FX-8350 stock cooler by AVC
>>51879485
That's interesting. Is there any way to make sure that you avoid getting a certain fan on your cooler by SKU or something?
>>51879485
Oh, tiny little 80 mm fan
You have to spin so much faster than your bigger brothers to move the same amount of air.
You're so loud and obnoxious little 80 mm fan, fuck off and become 120 mm.
>>51875927
kek
>>51878166
>kek who do you think ruled the GPU market until late 90s?
Either Nvidia or ATI
>>51879601
I thought it was actually 70mm
![P1010023[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/uO7fuVY.jpg "P1010023[1].jpg")
>>51879325
Pretty sure most of the FX 8XXX series use this heatpiped AVC cooler, pictured is the 8150 and the sempron 145 stock cooler
The sempron 145 cooler pictured here is the Z7LH01R201 which is the exact same part on the A6-5400K and the A4 series APUs which is the coolermaster, however this particular cooler is sometimes found on the FX-6000 series, not a very good cooler IMO as I have one cooling an x2 250 right now.
I also have the AVC cooler from a FX-8320E and the CMDK8-4I52D made by CoolerMaster.
I also have an unmarked 2 heatpipe stock amd heatsink from supposedly Delta.
So all I've seen is the low end shitty AMD stock coolers made by CoolerMaster and they underwhelm me.
>>51879601
AMD coolers have 70mm fans, and they are all in the 6000~6400rpm range on the mid/high range CPUs, they are loud as fuck under load with that distinctive server fan whine.
>>51877081
Pretty much this. I had to put together a VMWare host so I could host like 25 Developer VM's and AMD was the only choice. 32 AMD cores was the price of 12 Intel cores, and for a highly threaded application like virtualization, the minor per core speed advantage of the Intel was far outweighed by the sheer number of cores that I could get from the AMD.
>muh heat rises
hot air rises in a room with little forced circulation
in a contained, busy system like the inside of a computer heat goes wherever the air goes. that's the whole point of fans.
>buy pentium G for my HTPC
>comes with 100% alloy sink
>open PC parts box
>original i5 stock sink is still in there
>it has a copper core
>mfw it's perfectly overkill for the little pentium
![41bGI46Wy0L[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SzWTIKH.jpg "41bGI46Wy0L[1].jpg")
>>51879971
I keep a few of these Fujikura Intel stock heatsinks around as they do wonders for overclocking the 45nm and smaller chips
I have a budget gaming rig with an i3-6100 and a GTX 960 SSC. I used the stock heatsink in my build, and it works just fine. If I listen carefully, I can hear it over my AC.
The stock heatsink works fine, but don't plan on overclocking while using it. Most of the people calling stock heatsinks shit are pretentious 13 year olds that don't contribute to society. Look at benchmarks and reviews before you look to the aforementioned 13 year olds.
>>51875536
For a low power i3 it'll work, but on an 88 watt i7 it's not up to the task.
![Intel-Skylake-S-Thermal-Solutions-PCG-2015D[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/k6jZQcu.jpg "Intel-Skylake-S-Thermal-Solutions-PCG-2015D[1].jpg")
>>51880133
The full aluminum version is rated for 65W, the copper core version is 91~95W, it's adequate, for stock settings.
An Xeon E3 1231 V3 turboboosting to 3.6ghz will consume 112W according to HWmonitor.
Which is why Intel has the 130W PCG 2015D and the TS15A
>>51878009
>knockoff Intel designs
...that were somehow better than the original Intel designs...
>incompetent
They had to sell their fabs because Hector Ruiz is a complete fuck up and a failed abortion.
>management and marketing collaborate to kill the project
Not going to argue with you here, but this is why they kicked out most of their management recently.
>Intel is a god tier company
lol, gtfo shill
>>51879701
that is bizarre. My friend just bought an 8350 and got that same HSF but with cooler master fan on it.
I do know that the 6350 has a different fan from the 6300 due to the TDP difference; that probably holds true across all the SKU brackets.
The AVC cooler variant I have had in the past and it performed badly, but then again it was trying to cool an OC'd Phenom II X4 965 (140W variant). It was hitting 70C+ easily. I've seen better perf from the CM variants I've had, and they're a little quieter as well.
As for any Delta fans, it's too bad but I haven't had any come my way yet. A shame as they're one of my favorite OEM fan makers.
>>51880397
The coolermaster made one is smaller than the AVC
>>51880491
>smaller is obviously worse lel
>those ancient fin designs
>that inefficient and poorly made motor
>those horrendous tolerances between the fan tips and the fan cage
Yeah AVC a shit bro, I would be utterly surprised if they outperformed the cooler master variant
>>51879340
Loo
![p1000828-jpg[1].52287_.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/rtX8jEt.jpg "p1000828-jpg[1].52287_.jpg")
>>51880397
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQXj6SoO_KI
This guy is pissed that his 8350 came with a coolermaster block but Delta fan, they are all saying that it's fuck loud in the comments.
>>51876403
Basically what you are saying is you are poor.
HOW THE FUCK DO I INSTALL THE 212 EVO
>>51880736
With screws and a backplate. Also: RTFM.
still use my stock cooler on 4690k.
havent overclocked yet. temps are fine but the fan noise are a bit to loud for my liking
>>51876784
Is it?
cuck
>>51880736
There's a manual, read it
>>51880736
If you have it on the AM3+ socket you gotta put it in such that the fan is blowing vertically. Basically, sideways.
>>51880682
If you watch to the end he hasn't even run the fucking system seriously with it. The ramping and unramping is typical PWM bullshit when you're sitting right at a temp gate in the firmware, and can be mitigated if you're not busy frothing at the mouth.
He should actually be happy unless he values quiet above performance; Delta fans are known for giving literally no fucks about anything except MTBF and pumping out the jam when it comes to performance. If he wants quiet he can just set a better profile in firmware or software and shut the fuck up.
Unless delta is skimping on that fan, which I've never seen them do yet, the tier system for these coolers would be Delta > Cooler Master > AVC > Foxconn.
>>51879391
It really doesn't matter honestly. Just do what feels right, but don't put too much on.
>>51880874
That's not true at all. I have one for my 6350 and it's mounted for horizontal airflow
>>51880020
>6100
try with something that actually produces heat, fucking gayass poorfag
>>51881085
whelp, I done fucked up then. To be fair, CM themselves claim the damn thing only mounts in one direction.
>>51881216
>try with something that actually produces heat, fucking gayass poorfag
> Most of the people calling stock heatsinks shit are pretentious 13 year olds that don't contribute to society.
Apt.
>>51881678
>projecting because you can't afford a good chip, nor a better heatsink to cool it
only pic I have of my guts but I've had my 212 evo fan on my 8320 now for over 2 years and she has never skipped a beat. Only runs 400-500rpm and is very quiet. Runs 20-28* celcius on average depending on load.
install wasn't complicated at all - where are people getting that from?
>>51881902
yeah I definitely stand corrected. I earlier said that it was in the manual, but now reflecting back on that I don't think that was right either. I must have been confusing it with a Deepcool Gammaxx mount I also did recently.
>>51881810
Do I really need more than an i3 if I can play all my games with it at maximum settings?
>>51882325
Not yet no. Plus once you got to really high resolutions cpu is basically irrelevant unless its potato class.
>>51882427
In 2-3 years when it's time to upgrade, I'll get a new core i3 or a core i5. I'll also get whatever new version of the GTX 960 or its equivalent are out. My motherboard has DDR4 RAM, which will last quite a while.
>>51882427
that depends. will he be heavily multitasking while playing games? will he be wanting to stream using the CPU? will he be wanting to do any heavy transcoding work off the CPU? will he be wanting to run any servers while playing on them simultaneously? does he want to run multiseat to reduce overall cost and improve energy efficiency in his household? is he interested in reducing stuttering on newer titles that will expect more than 4 threads in the future? does he want to justify spending any more money than he should have spent on an Athlon X2 370K?
Basically, does he have any interest in being at all versatile?
Nothing wrong with it, but some of us enjoy having lower temps in our computers.
My friends haswell quad core xeon got to 97°c during intel burn test on stock cooler. It's below the thermal cut off/throttling temp, but just barely.
>>51879687
Not 3dfx?
Those were the good times before we were locked to 2 incompetent gpu companies.
>>51882509
>post
Well if the answer to most of those questions in the here and now is yes there are only two real options: 8350 or balls out to a i7.
>>51882509
I have no interest in being versatile. My only interests are gaming on the desktop and writing/programming/shitposting on my laptop.
>>51875536
I HATE Intel stock heatsinks, holy hell are they bad. I was trying to do a motherboard upgrade and in doing to had to take my CPU out of the old one, with stock heatsink and all. The fucker simply would not come off under any circumstances. I ended up having to take a crowbar and pry the piece of shit off. This did the trick, but my troubles weren't over. I put my old CPU in my new mobo, and then prepared to put on a spare, unused Intel stock heatsink I had lying around, and would you know it, it would not fit. Despite properly seating it over the processor, only one of the four corners ever clamped down. Fuck stock heatsinks.
>>51881674
It's possible that your motherboard makes it impossible, my Asus m5a97 r2.0 board had holes that allowed me to mount it either way.
>>51875536
>temps idled at 50 with it
>any usage would spike to 70
>throw a notcua u9s on it
>its now as cool as my SSD when idle
>only up to about 50c under use
I run an i5 2500 non k with a stock fan and I love it. No problems ever.
>>51883144
I used to have an i5-2500k with stock cooler, overclocked to 4GHz without any problems. Those CPUs are literally legendary-tier, and should NEVER be tossed out.
I switched to an i7-4790k because I can achieve the same thing without overclocking, and because motherboards with better hardware options were ditching the socket-type of the i5-2500k. Either way, save that CPU for anything you can think of (server, VM, etc).
>>51879687
somebody throw out that underage
>>51875536
I wouldn't spend too much on mine but I'd get a better model honestly.
>>51877938
>i fucking hate Intel and NVIDIA for all the shit they pull off just to sell their stuff, but i value my money too
Then why support the two companies with the worst performance per dollar ratio in the industry?
>>51884889
'Cuz /g/ is full of consumer whores, thus whoever has the betterm arketing must inherently have the better product. If you haven't heard of a company they - by definition - are shit.
You can see this when /g/ talks about power supply units. "Super Flower? lol never heard of them must be some chink shit".
>>51876562
>doesn't change the fact that google can't fetch images from 4chan anymore.
still works on google.com.au
>bought i5 2400 like 4 years ago
>stock cooler since then
>never replaced thermalpaste
>idles at 45-50 and tops at 95 full load
>it just weeks
Bretty gud
I just bought an LN49126
Did i do good?
>>51885449
What i meant to say was i bought an Noctua NH-L9i
Fucking pasta
>>51885474
Noctua don't make bad cpu coolers, only better ones.
>>51875536
it's ok if you don't put it on yourself and never plan on taking it off
>>51885390
50 idle is retardedly high
>95 at full load
Am I being trolled ? Your processor should have melted by now at those tmeps.
>Buying cpu coolers for <$300 cpus
![a_cogage_true_spirit_cpu_cooler_lite_pic[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fIqd5KW.jpg "a_cogage_true_spirit_cpu_cooler_lite_pic[1].jpg")
>>51885795
I knew someone who bought a TrueSpirit 120 for his Celeron E3300, it still died this year and he upgraded to an i5.
I have his true spirit on a shelf as he didn't want to buy the 1150 mounting kit and wanted to upgrade to water cooling down the line.
>>51885725
TJMAX for recent intel CPUs is 100C in which they will trigger a shutdown.
They'll happily run 24/7 at full speed as long as you keep it under 80~85C as it throttles when it hits that..
>>51885725
>Am I being trolled ? Your processor should have melted by now at those tmeps.
Are you retarded? 95 is very doable for many processors.
>>51875536
That thing is loud
>>51886273
Ironically FX chips need to be kept far cooler than most cpus in existence (even other AMD chips) - their max temp is more or less 70c.
>>51886985
Topkek
Last AMD I had was just after Thunderbird. Not that I remember what max temp it supported but 70 is fucking nothing nowadays. Glad I got a sandy bridge i5 over an FX.
>>51882930
>Its takes a crane to get it out
>>51875536
>turn on pc
>nothing
>nothing
>nothing
>wrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
then it works okay but the startup is annoying
>>51882930
did you try turning the pins fag?
>>51877904
Aight dawg, imma trust u, thanks
Is this better then the hype 212
>>51887997
>buy i5 4670k back in like 2013
>turn on PC
>*beep*.............WRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Every time
>>51889991
It goes into overspeed at boot to supposedly kick off dust. Plenty of laptops go full speed with the fan at boot too.
>>51875536
My meme3258 runs at 1.28V 4.3GHz with the stock cooler and never gets over 70C, But the only way I can even stress it enough to get to 70C is by running a stress test. All other times the maximum temperature it gets to is in the 60s.
>>51875536
I don't, since I don't OC or otherwise run my hardware out of spec the stock cooler is fine for me.
>>51876555
This, I had to underclock a 4790k in a new build this summer until I could get a better heatsink
>>51876784
what was it censored to?
also i know about "desu senpai" but what translates into baka?
>putting 5lbs heavy and 10' tall metal blocks on a fragile mobo
Are there any retard proof coolers for socket 1155? Want to finally get rid of stock cooler but I think I remember having trouble with putting it in in the first place.
I don't want some fucking beast worth a backplate as I'm not OCing anyway. I5 2400 btw.
>>51893712
Coolermaster TX3 EVO
or Coolermaster Hyper212x Turbo if you're ok with a backplate.
>>51893913
I've been looking at low profile coolers because they seem cheap and mostly don't use backplates.
The zalmann cnps8900 and noctua nhl9a
>>51876536
>>51876562
>>51876508
works with Bing
>>51893943
Those two aren't that great in terms of cooling capacity. The Noctua NHL9A is basically made for server rack mount cases.
Check out the Noctua NH-L9x65 ?
>>51882930
>>51888265
The problem is the fact that stock coolers use adhesive thermal paste. Shit becomes like concrete after a while.
>>51893979
I have come across that one but thought it would be louder because of the smaller fan, then again it's going to be miles quieter than the Intel stock thing.
My pc has been running flawlessly and for some reason i keep tellong myself to get the easiest thing to install otherwise ill fuck it up. Ive always been suspicious of really tall and heavy heatsinks.
Both AMD and Intel have awful stock heatsinks.
Intel's are bad and Amd's are loud.
>tfw using that little qt3.14 cpu cooler for 3 years now with my i7 3770
>tfw 24C idle, never seen it go above 70C on the heaviest gaming/VM/CPU demanding tasks.
Works fine if you ask me.
