Is Western Digital still the best for hard drives?
Or should I switch to something new for my upgrade?
>>51831463
>Western Digital still the best for hard drives?
i can't recall a time that they ever were.
Well shit, what do you suggest, /g/? Wiki doesn't say anything on the matter.
>not going hitachi/seagate
>>51831597
>Seagate
sure, if you dont give a shit about your data
>>51831653
>backblaze
>>51831713
>actual study
>vs banana poster
C'mon anon, step it up.
>>51831653
>look mom I posted it again!
OP, just look at the reviews and whatever is cheapest
>>51831750
that is a study of cramming consumer grade hard drives into fuckhuge enterprise enclosures and running hard 24/7
i dont know is dumber, the fact a fucking professional company does this, or the fact retards post those images thinking they relate to normal consumer use
>>51831777
Heavenly trips confirm.
yup, my seagaytes drives died first and the ones still running have clicking noise. while 11 year old wd 250gb still running smooth.
>>51831846
>250gb
>>51831777
>the fact a fucking professional company does this
Do you have any idea what the cost savings on using those would be?
>>51831653
Graphic is misleading because they only tested a few particular models of hard drives.
And they've only tested those in their intensive RAID setup.
It should not represent the brand itself, and it does not represent typical home usage either.
