>Freesync monitor
>1920x1080
>27"
>IPS
why doesn't this exist?
>>51821312
>4k
>24"
>IPS
>1ms
>No ghosting
>>51821312
Because 27" and 1080p would make the pixels look like Lego bricks. Try 1440p.
>>51821423
What is this, 2009? 4k or bust.
>>51821499
my build cant handle 4k and im a poorfag
Are there any nice 60hz 1080p monitors with very low response time for under 200 dollars? My rig can't handle 144hz or higher resolutions.
>>51821370
K242HQK fits most of your requirements.
>>51821312
Pic related. At this size even 4k is only 160 PPI. I can't even imagine how awful a 27'' display at 1080p would look. At least get 1440p at this size.
>>51821646
You can always just play in 1440p on a 4K screen.
>>51821761
Almost all of them. 60Hz 1080p with low response time is as basic of a feature set as you can get.
>>51822111
>Pic related
>>51822111
>I'm a poorfag so I can't afford a 4k screen nor a rig that can handle 4K
>LOL JUST BUY A 4K MONITOR AND SET IT TO 1440P XD
>>51822262
By "handle 4k" I assumed you meant games, because actually just powering a 4k display for desktop usage isn't hard at all. Intel integrated graphics do it just fine.
>4k
>120hz
tfw never ever
>>51822309
>8k OLED 240hz monitor will come out in your lifetime
I guess this is the general monitor thread so I'll ask here.
Is this: http://www.amazon.com/PB278Q-2560x1440-DisplayPort-Ergonomic-Back-lit/dp/B009C3M7H0/ a good choice for someone with a 970 OC? Will I get 60fps in most shit at 1440p, and if not, what about 1080p (windowed)?
>>51821312
>1080p
>27"
why would you do that.
>>51822569
The only game I haven't been able to play at 1440p at the highest settings this year was Witcher 3, which still ran at 1440p/60fps I just had to turn off hairworks and tweak a few settings. Nvidia's little game setting optimizer sets the resolution to 1440p in every game I've tried it with and I have yet to actually be forced to go to 1080p.
>>51822569
>>51822569
>GTX 3.5
>ever
>>51822111
How about low input lag? I was looking at some ASUS monitors and there was one within my budget, but a lot of the reviewers were complaining about input lag being too high for competitive gaming.
If I buy a 144hz "gaming" monitor can I lower the hz?
>>51822669
Even IPS displays are hitting 5ms response time in the $150 models. TN panels are already 1ms response time. Any reviews about "input lag" are either placebo or someone who doesn't understand the difference between lower Hz and input delay.
>>51822638
>>51822660
MEMES GUYS
MEMES
Fuck off you shitposting idiots. It has been proven numerous times that you WILL NOT reach 3.5gb at 1080p (and I guess 1440p as well from what the other guy said).
I'll enjoy my $230 card that doesn't need a 1kW power supply.
Thanks for the image hashes, though. I added them to my filter so I don't have to see anyone retarded enough to post them again.
>>51822754
>$230 card
the GTX 970 costs $400
>>51822732
Okay, that makes sense. Would this suit my needs then? It's recommended by logicalincrements and it seems to have all the features I want.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236153&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-LogicalIncrements.com%20Inc-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=10440897&PID=5961731&SID=0
>>51822791
>the GTX 970 costs $400
Not on Black Friday it didn't.
It cost $289
I got a $30 Rebate that I traded for real money
so $259
It came with a key for that new Rainbow Six or AC game that I sold for $30
$229
Sorry you spent so much money on your housefire.
>>51822824
>>51821312
Because 1920x1080 at 27" has terrible DPI.
>>51822842
>he lives in fucking Hungary
>and he's trying to tell me how much things cost in America
Just off yourself you shitskin scum.
You should be more concerned with feeding yourself (and the rest of your gypsy family) instead of graphics cards.
>>51822872
just fuck my currency up
