/speccy/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Come and compare your dick sizes.
HP Elitebook 8470p
>>51758741
>Windows 10
my dick is huge.
>>51758775
I'm not up to speed on my ThinkPad models, which one is this?
>>51758807
it's a T400.
>>51758922
2gb 980 Ti?
>>51758741
Here, herr Freud
>>51758945
Speccy a shit
>>51758922
nah breh. Check out my system, a real system...
>>51758986
fair enough it doesn't even pick up my ram speed.
>>51758986
For real. I don't know why they haven't fixed some of these obvious issues.
r8
>>51759056
I'm so sorry/10
>>51759056
Delete that picture before you get this Vista > any version of windows shit meme started again.
>>51758922
Thinking about getting a 500gb 850 evo
Thoughts on it?
Also here's my speccy
>>51759073
I have a desktop for serious things
>>51759056
>vista
>DDR2
>HDD
>>51759000
>>51759088
what the actual hell, same cpu, ram, and basically the same gpu
>>51759088
personally i'd get a 128gb SSD and a new GPU.
>>51759088
If you are going for a sata SSD it's good. It fills out the sata 3 bus easily and, the only difference between it and the PRO would be noticeable only in benchmarks.
However, if you can go M.2 the 950 is a beast
>>51759122
GPU's fine
i can run battlefront on high settings, 1080p, fullscreen at 60fps
I'll overclock my cpu, and get a new gpu when games need me to
>>51759137
Yeah i was checking out m.2's
They're not even that expensive per Gb (compared to SATA ssd's), but my motherboard has no slot
Maybe one day
>>51759195
fair enough with your GPU, but you can get a M.2 to PCI-E adaptor card, if you haven't got a M.2 slot.
>>51758775
>>51759056
BROTHERS
>>51759248
Wouldn't PCI-E 2.0 bottleneck it?
SATA 3 is 6 Gb/s, whats 2.0?
>>51759266
>3gb RAM
This computer is a mess. Send help.
>>51759284
1x is 500mb/s which is about the same a SATA3.
and ever extra PCI-E lane it takes it adds another 500mb/s to the bandwidth. and M.2 is 2x so you get 1gb/s
>>51759310
post pics pls, inside and out
I not only wanna see your terrible wire management, but i also wanna see the case you're using for this shit
>>51759340
I see
So how would this setup work?
Got any pics?
>>51759266
I just wish the GPU wouldn't suck so hard
I can't even run GTA SA without massive fps drops
>>51759388
that fucking cpu with that gpu makes me so angry
>>51759388
>i3
>970
okay
>>51759379
>>51759384
Get Sniper BNA drivers if you have the GMA 4500. Makes things so much better on most games. Easily tripled my Resolution in PPSSPP and still butter smooth.
>>51759363
I don't have any guts pics and can't get any due to the case being wedged between a desk and a dresser.
>>51759425
be careful with that as those drivers killed my latitude XT2.
>>51759310
RAID THE SSDs!
>>51759445
How exactly? Were there any warn signals?
>>51759388
>>51759421
lol you'd be surprised how capable that lil' i3 is (for vidya at least)
>>51759445
Fucking how?
Disable Windows Update, uninstall Intel Drivers, confirm drivers are uninstalled and Windows isn't having a panic attack, reboot, install Drivers, reboot once more.
There. If you fucked up it's probably your fault. Never had a single problem with it and I've installed and uninstalled multiple times.
>>51759462
nope but it could have been down to heat as the XT2 has a small fan due to it being a 2in1, just keep an eye out but the driver is good for getting a little more out of games.
>>51759422
That's kinda neat!
What's the price for something like this?
upgrade plans: evga supernova g2 750W - january
gpu - either r9 390 in february/march or i'm waiting for pascal/greenland.
bigger ssd (was thinking about 850 evo) and new monitors in plans too but probably not in next 6 months or so
>>51759541
£25 which is quite a bargain
just google asus hyper M.2 4x.
>>51759442
>wedged between a desk and a dresser.
>>51758741
How did I do?
>>51759599
Fucking sweet overclock but cookie cutter otherwise.
>>51759310
How in the world did you manage to cram all those drives in your case
>>51759573
Why would you go for a 750w when you ain't doing SLI/Xfire. A 550w is plenty for any single video card system unless you're using some dumb CPU like the 9590
>>51759663
i want modular and semi passive, from a good manufacturer so i wont have to deal with any bullshit like coil whine. 10 years warranty on it is a huge plus too. and price diffirence between 550 and 750W isnt so huge either - less than $20 converted from my local currency. can't find 650W anywhere but i guess it'd be priced somewhere in the middle of them.
and i might do sli/crossfire in the future, would be nice to have psu ready for it.
>>51759574
I only have PCI-E 2.0 x16 slots (x16, x4)
Currently using x16 for my gpu
Would it even be worth putting this into the x4, or does it not really matter?
Wow so much Intel here
you fags need to Become Amd Overlords only then can you get such Speeds
Having trouble getting my 144Hz monitor to stay there and stop reverting to 60Hz. Might need a better video card which is sad because I just bought this.
>>51759846
TEACH ME
>>51759088
IM DROOLING
>>51759846
>8350
>5 GHz
>Idle at just 31c
Hold the fuck up
>>51759846
What voltage did you set it at?
>>51759663
Because then you kill your ability to add more cards instead of buying a new psu
>>51759846
I will go back to AMD CPUs when they reach acceptable levels of single threaded performance.
>>51759993
Steamfag detected
>>51759000
WHAT THE FUCK IS ALL OF THAT USB SHIT
>>51760121
what is that? a raspberry?
>>51760121
At least it runs Windo-
>32 GB SD Storage
\
Nevermind, at this level Chrome OS really would be better.
You better run a distro on it in the future.
>>51759942
cpu is 1,44 and ram is 1,54. i followed a pretty nice guide. on how to clock the 8350 to 5ghz.
>>51760181
CAN I HABE LINK PLZ
How big would my dick be if i built this ?
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/D72gGX
>>51760279
Average.
It runs a bit toasty, but it's okay.
>>51760453
Bruh.
What's so toasty about it?
>>51760602
well the cards are running a bit hotter under load than i'd like.
>>51759925
Fixed it some more and turned on the power saver. now this is the true idle temp
>>51760247
http://www.overclock.net/t/1348623/amd-bulldozer-and-piledriver-overclocking-guide-asus-motherboard
there you got. might how to tweak it a bit for your motherboard, but the basics are there.
>>51760871
Just how cold is your room? Going by your SSD temps I would guess around 20c, in which case unless you have a radiator on that CPU running outside that temp is nowhere near accurate.
>>51760714
What coolers are on them? I notice you have two different brands so perhaps they're reference coolers, in which case I wouldn't be surprised they run hot. Mine are both watercooled (along with the CPU) but when I first got the second card it had a reference cooler on, thermal throttled like a bitch even though it was on the bottom and had case fans feeding it cool air (could've turned the fan up but fuck that noise).
>>51761371
Those temps are under idle with power saver on.
Under full load on all core i get 60c
its a closed loop water cooler h100gtx
with the fans venting out of the case.
The case is a tower with air in from front,side, and buttom and a air out in the back&top
>>51760871
Turn your fucking heating up Jesus Christ, you must be freezing in that room.
>>51761557
Unless you have a phase change cooler or a radiator outside your house it's physically impossible for your CPU to be below ambient temperature. Now, your CPU is going to be at least 5c above ambient with that cooler, bare minimum, and if your room is 8c or colder that's just ridiculous (I don't think ACs can even get that cold, you'd need to have all your windows open on a cold winter night).
Now, if you honestly think that reading is accurate you need to ask yourself why your SSDs are running hotter than your CPU and 13-15C+ over ambient.
>>51761371
The xfx card is DD one and the Asus a dcu2 one
The xfx cooler is shit. When I only had that card in my rig, temps were in the upper 80s.
The Asus on is a bit better but even that goes quite easily to high temps .
>>51761815
Because my cpu is contected to a Closed loop water cooler with a 24cm radiator with the fans blowing out of the case. and the case has 3 fans drawing air from the front,side,buttom, with a air vent in the back of the case. those the air flow goes into the case, the termal heat from the radiator is vented out of the case. cold air streams inside the case cools.
so the cold air stream all goes up into the radiator fans cooling the radiator. those the air speed cools the radiator below room temperature.
>>51758741
>Windows 10
>You made me racist Obama
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_8fZ0LzmEE
Good enuf 4 me senpai
>>51759088
9 C? wtf?
>>51761815
>>51761815
>>51762018
>>51762084
I don't give a fuck, you're not defying physics. Either your room is really fucking cold (like, cold enough that you'd probably want to wrap yourself up in a blanket) and your SSDs are putting out a shit ton of heat for some reason, or that temp reading is completely wrong. I'm gonna go for the latter, it's not unusual to see incorrect temps in speccy for AMD CPUs.
>>51762211
Hahaha dont leacture me on physics you dont understand
here take a look at this picture, The Inside of my case is basically a wind turbine blowing cool air,
>>51758922
Pretty damn close to mine.
>>51762274
1. You fans aren't blowing that fast.
2. Wind chill doesn't actually result in temperatures below ambient, it's just a perceived effect.
>It cannot, however, reduce the temperature of these objects below the ambient temperature, no matter how great the wind velocity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_chill
>>51762447
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_chill
Explanation[edit]
A surface loses heat through conduction, convection, and radiation.[1] The rate of convection depends on the difference in temperature between the surface and its surroundings. As convection from a warm surface heats the air around it, an insulating boundary layer of warm air forms against the surface. Moving air disrupts this boundary layer, or epiclimate, allowing for cooler air to replace the warm air against the surface. The faster the wind speed, the more readily the surface cools.
The effect of wind chill is to increase the rate of heat loss and reduce any warmer objects to the ambient temperature more quickly. It cannot, however, reduce the temperature of these objects below the ambient temperature, no matter how great the wind velocity. For most biological organisms, the physiological response is to generate more heat in order to maintain a surface temperature in an acceptable range. The attempt to maintain a given surface temperature in an environment of faster heat loss results in both the perception of lower temperatures and an actual greater heat loss. In other words, the air 'feels' colder than it is because of the chilling effect of the wind on the skin. In extreme conditions this will increase the risk of adverse effects such as frostbite.
>>51762447
i just felt my radiator its clearly way below room temperature.
Clearly I've built such an amazing system that even the basic laws of physics it self brakes.
>>51762549
Stop running your fans at such high speed. You're going to erode your cooling system, and it's already at a loud 20dB
r8 m8s
