Mozilla doesn't fail to make a new bad decision every day: People who decide to give Firefox Hello a try will automatically have their tabs shared to their contacts without their consent from now on.
http://www.ghacks.net/2015/12/07/firefox-hello-contacts-to-be-removed-tab-sharing-incoming/
>>51733942
It's a good thing I disabled that shit and never intend to use it then.
>without their consent
It seems your own screenshot disproves that allegation.
>2015
>SJWzilla Firecu.ck
>>51734440
>Hey, we just shared the entirety of you browsing data along with the list of all the porn you watched for the past 10 years with all your friends, along with a bunch of profiling agencies that surely won't hesitate to sell it to the company you work for, and you might lose your job! How exciting!
>Perhaps you want to disable it? Click here!
THANK GOD I CAN DISABLE IT
>>51733942
>>51733942
>doesn't fail
such a shame
it was a great browser once
>bad decisions in a nightly build
What a shock OP.
>>51734485
I rather doubt it gets sent to anyone other than who you're calling.
If you have a point to make, you might want to tone down the ridiculous exaggerations.
>>51734561
You're calling someone supposedly to talk to them, not to let them know your browsing habits at home.
>>51734680
I can see it being a useful feature, although I wholly agree it probably shouldn't be enabled by default. That's besides the point, though.
>>51734440
pretty much this
Is it the same guy who creates those threads against Mozilla every day?
>>51735046
Same shitty ghacks website at least. Couldn't be assed to even find the bugzilla ticket: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1209713
Seems they are significantly changing the scope of Hello.
>>51734945
>That's besides the point, though.
Well no that's the whole point, because by the time you realize it, it's too late already.
>>51733942
so that's the shit they're wasting their time on?
>>51735274
>As a Desktop client user, I want to initiate a sharing session as simply as possible.
said nobody, ever.
>>51735567
You're worried that a strange feature in an end-to-end encrypted service, maintained by a nonprofit organisation, will lead to a slippery slope of privacy violations?
>>51735819
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959893
https://threatpost.com/webrtc-found-leaking-local-ip-addresses/110803/
https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/forum/discussion/8204/how-to-stop-webrtc-local-ip-address-leaks-on-google-chrome-and-mozilla-firefox-while-using-private-i
>>51735819
>end-to-end encrypted service
I guess that would be alright if I was secure on my end.
I'm not.
>>51735882
Yes, webrtc has issues and that whole thing should be resolved. Promptly. Old news. And not by design.
>>51733942
why? what's the point of sharing tabs with friends?
>>51736030
synchronous fapping to furryporn
>>51736030
>>51736047
its like parallel computing
>parallel masturbation
>>51736030
this, seriously. what purpose does it serve? if you want to show them a website just copy and paste the link.
>>51736208
Or just, you know, share it on Facebook, which is what normies do.
I don't get who this feature targets.
