Happy cracking! https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat
Can i be a hacker with this?
>>51718331
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Hacker
>>51718361
No one cares what your cult leader thinks. Fucking religious faggots.
>>51718459
>no one
One anon != 7.3 billion people
>>51718616
Stallman's time is over and he sucks. He's irrelevant and doesn't know how to use modern operating systems because all he does is be an ideologue who doesn't live in the real world. He now spends his time being a pest and making himself look stupid on mailing lists. I doubt very many people care about your meme.
>>51718616
>>51718616
>>51718361
fuck that faggot stallman, I promote the use of proprietary software like windows 10 just to piss that faggot off.
>>51718865
>>51718913
This isn't about him. It's about the open source community in general, which Cryptocat apparently now also is a part of. You kids just like to argue for arguing's sake. Here's your response.
>>51718971
*Hashcat
My mistake.
>>51718913
>I promote
Why?
>>51719018
I don't promote, droogie. Just liked to share this news with /g/.
>>51718971
>This isn't about him. It's about the open source community in general
No its about the free software foundation cult not about free software. Hacker does not mean what it did 25+ years ago. Or doth thou protest?
>>51719147
>Or doth thou protest?
I think I do. For one FSF isn't a cult. It's as much a cult as Microsoft is, or some sort of community of people that like peanut butter jelly on their bread. The ambiguity expressed with words such as hacker is a problem, much like when I order noodles and I get spaghetti for instance.
But this is waaaay off topic, I was hoping for some Hashcat discussions.
>>51718361
Don't care.
>>51718459
Still don't care.
>>51718865
I don't care that he's irrelevant, because he is.
I care because his earlier works, before he went batshit insane, are slowly showing up. The Right To Read is unfolding before our eyes but you're too fucking stupid - and spoonfed - to look up from your master's cock to figure it out.
>>51718913
Enjoy your spyware, fucktard.
http://bgr.com/2015/07/31/windows-10-upgrade-spying-how-to-opt-out/
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/windows-10-spying-how-to-opt-out-of-microsofts-intrusive-terms-of-use-10432300.html
http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/is-windows-10-spying-you-microsoft-finally-speaks-out-1305307
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/windows-10-spying-how-to-opt-out-of-microsofts-intrusive-terms-of-use-10432300.html
and what discussion would be complete without the controlled opfor:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/no-microsoft-is-not-spying-on-you-with-windows-10/
(ZDNet lying sacks of shit...)
Cortana is the perfect rat bait. So tempting to use...and as soon as you do, you're hooked..
>>51719147
Fucking grampa cat would take his lead-lined cane and open a can of whoop ass on your cracker head.
>not a single Hashcat discussion
I'll start. How does Hashcat compare to John The Ripper?
>>51721597
There are some comparisons online. They mostly boil down to that John is a very good cracker, who may be faster than Hashcat provided you're using the Jumbo patched version. Hashcat is arguably faster by default though (for some hashes), and may catch some uncracked ones left by John.
Of course, as far as I've deduced from some comparisons. Not speaking from personal experience. I've only used John thus far, which works great.
>>51718274
wow, nice!
what about oclHashcat?
>>51722844
well, holy shit: https://github.com/hashcat/oclHashcat
what happened? IIRC, they used to hate being told to open source their tools
>>51722878
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4880.html He eventually saw the light that going open source opens many doors. He states that, for example, It'll be much easier to integrate external libraries (think of GPG) as well making it possible for users to use Hashcat with their own GPU kernel drivers. But mainly because it enables users to directly add salts at compilation time, which is only available when the source code is available.
>>51722844
It will be made open source as well as per the announcement https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4880.html :-)
>>51718913
Euphoric post, my fellow closed source advocate!
>>51718913
>>51723473
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerckhoffs%27_principle
Go back to school.
