Would you use this software /g/ it if existed for Linux?
>>51701540
it's called dd you fucking retard
>>51701540
No, because it would just be a shitty subset of the features available natively with the coreutils
dd alone can do everything this pile of shit does and more
>>51701540
Why would I use some bullshit like that when I have the coreutils?
>>51701540
GNU/Linux already can do all of this.
>muh dd XDD
fucking freeturds
>>51701984
Name one thing this program can do that dd/coreutils can't do or can't do better.
>>51702055
having a gui
>>51702055
(op here)
dude its a front-end for dd chill your tits
>>51702500
>>51702071
I bet, that something like this exists.
>>51701540
dd already exists
I wouldn't personally because secret club l33t hax0r /g/ mentality. But for desktop linux, this would be beneficial
freeturds cannot into writings of complete programs :3
>>51701540
it's called dd you dipshit
also dipshit, snapshots are a better way to backup shit.
>>51702500
I wouldn't use it, but some people might. It has to be GPL3 if you're using GNU's dd though.
