>/g/ tells me intel cpus are better than amds
>replace my 6300 with an i7 920
>its a piece of shit that performs worse in every regard
>can't even overclock it cause its locked
>mfw I fell for the intel meme
>>51624720
>i7 920
Nigga that CPU is 7 years old. You find that in a fucking pyramid or what? Get with the times retard.
>>51624720
>can't even overclock it cause its locked
Bitch you're lying, my 920 has been at 4ghz for 6 years its literally the perfect CPU.
>>51624720
>my processor that was released in October 2012 is better than the one that was released in October 2008
>I don't understand why
>I'm a huge faggot please rape my face
>can't OC a 920
buuuulllllshiiiiiiitttt
>worse than fx6300
also buuuullllshiiiiiittt
>replacing a 4 year old CPU with an almost-8-year-old CPU
reeeeetttaaaaarrrrd. also BUUUULLLLLLSHIIIIIITTTT
>>51624720
>I bought something without doing research
yes, anon, you did fall for the meme
and you fucking deserve it
enjoy your shitty purchase
>>51624720
>AMD 6300 first seen in Q4 2012
>i7 920 first seen in Q4 2008
>mfw you replace a newer CPU with an older one
Even AMD CPUs would do better than Intel's from a 4 year difference.
>>51624843
The sad thing is it doesn't even have the 920's IPC.
3.5GHz FX 6300 ~ i7 920 at 3.2GHz single threaded, and all six cores are only worth the i7's four at around 3.5GHz.
>there are people ITT who think a 6300 is better than an i7 920 OC'd
>>51625167
*actually, maybe less:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/100?vs=699
i7 beats it in every test but two at 3.06GHz.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/46?vs=699
Same at 2.93GHz
>>51625278
Indeed. The 920 is one hell of a processor.
I just swapped mine out for a 6700k, it's going in an HTPC case and will serve a few more years.
>>51625278
here's a fun one
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/444?vs=1403
990X, with an all-core turbo of 3591Mhz (similar to my $80 Xeon x5650 which runs 10% faster at 3916)
Compared to a 4.8Ghz 8320e
>>51625049
top kek no. no, no no no.
At 4.4Ghz a Nehalem/Westmere chip absolutely destroys a 5Ghz Bulldozer
>>51624720
>can't even overclock it cause its locked
if it has a K on it, it's unlocked you fucking retard
buy the unlocked version next time, the locked ones are there for those without the hardware to overclock
>>51624720
>>51626320
The K didn't come out until Sandy Bridge retard
>>51624720
>replace 6300 with an i7 920
Top kek
That CPU was released in like 2008
>>51624720
>>51626893
these are good posts.
>>51624720
>all these intel apologists
My sides laddies
>people are actually comparing a CPU AMD is still selling today to an Intel CPU that came out 7 years ago
Zen better come soon.
>>51624720
What's funny is that OP had to go REALLY far back in intel's lineup to find something that was actually worse than a 6300
>>51629083
>calls it a CPU AMD instead of AMD CPU
are you a retard? It completely invalidates everything you said and I'm more prone to believe OP now.
>>51629118
I meant to say "CPU that AMD is still selling today". As far as I know you can leave out the word "that" and the sentence would still be grammatically correct. I'm terribly sorry if I were incorrect about that. I find it however striking that you think one grammatical error invalidates my whole point.
Faggot.
>>51629171
you're right I'm sorry I was a faggot
