I just bought one of these cunts for £350.
I don't own a TV, does anyone have any experience with it?
>>51562122
High latency, enjoy
Great for movies, sports, tv in general
Kinda shitty for games due to the resolution being so high
>>51562122
Now you need a uhd dvd player and order uhd DVDs from amazon
>>51562122
YOUTUBE LOOKS GREAT ON IT
Games probably look worse and will have high lag.
Why do 4K TVs even exist?
>no cable companies broadcasting in 4K
>no 4K native Blu-Rays
>consoles can't even do 1080p properly
And don't give me the chicken and the egg bullshit.
>>51562349
I've been gaming in 4K for over a year already.
>>51562369
Me too, but not on a TV.
>>51562213
>>51562297
Specifically looked into this.
The latency is <30ms Apparently sits around 26 without interpolation. Not to mention I'll play games on my Ultra-wide, not this.
>>51562269
>>51562349
Netflix streams in 4k for one, plus I can put a 1080p video in the corner.
>>51562349
because bigger numbers makes peoples underwear wet.
>bigger phones
>bigger phone resolutions
>bbigger phone clocks
life was better when smaller = better.
>>51562442
It's like "smart".
Everything needs to be "smart". Smartphones were a good idea but now you need smart tvs, smart watches, pointless shit that doesn't do anything better.
TVs were best when they were dumb. When they took a picture and put it on a screen.
>>51562501
Remember when we had good PDAs instead of smartphones? When the best feature was not "it is thinner than the old model"?
>>51562349
>Why do 1080p TVs even exist?
>>no broadcasters in HD
>>no HD home media
>>consoles can't even do 480p
>>51562442
someone has a small dick lmao lol
>>51562410
Still have to have a device that can fun Netflix and supports 4k