ok apt-get vs. pacman
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
ok
apt-get vs. pacman
I preferred pacman.
>>51547429
>preferred
what made you change your decision?
yum
apt-get
because it doesnt fuck up my stuff
yaourt
Pacman + yaourt
>>51547782
I never had problems with pacman
All ways had problems with apt
Don't know y tho
./configure && make && sudo make install
>>51547320
>using aptitude
>>51547320
apt-get update ; apt-get -y upgrade ; apt-get -f -y install ; apt-get -y autoremove ; apt-get clean ;
Vs.
pacman -Syu --noconfirm
>>51547865
>&&
You wut m8
>>51547320
slackpkg
>>51548268
It catches errors better.
>>51547320
explorer.exe
emerge --sync; emerge -avuDN --with-bdeps y --keep-going world
>>51547320
pacman is objectively superior.
>>51547320
yaourt alias'd to pacman.
zypper
>>51548363
emerge -puqDN --color=y --with-bdeps=y @world | less
>>51548510
can you tell me the difference between @world and just world? Does it even matter?
apt-get is comfier because debian is comfiest
>>51547440
apt-get.
>>51548268
if one command fails in that line it will not run the next
>>51548526
Make it more clear that you want to emerge world set but not world atom?
>>51548607
Hmmmm
Learn something new everyday