Watch Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Muh "micro-engineering" edition
Old thread >>51443451
Whatever happened to the guy who made the guide?
>>51443451
>what is search
>>51460360
>what is bump limit
>>51460360
>what is bump limit
>>51460360
>guys im retarded what do
>>51460331
Beautiful.
>>51460360
hello newfriend :^)
>>51460506
how's that indirect seconds hand treating you? still stopping completely for several moments at a time?
>>51460540
Not too bad really. I've not been paying close attention to it lately but I have noticed that it seems to stutter between 15 and 25 seconds. The accuracy has improved since I received it too, initially it gained around 40 seconds a day but now it's down to ~15 seconds. Not bad for a £20 meme.
Objectively the best looking watch coming through
>>51460777
Mine did +7s/d initially but after a drop roughly -14s/d
can I get a decent watch for $500?
>>51460976
Seiko SARB / SARX
Orient Star
Non-shit microbrand of your choice.
>>51460360
viper-kill_yourself_my_man.jpg
you guys are alright
>>51460976
If I had $500 bucks right now this is what I'd be buying. http://www.deepbluewatches.com/brnewdascttr.html
>>51460907
Nice cuffs, you should try buying a shirt that fits. You do know that your watch should be able to fit under your cuff, otherwise you look like a prick.
>>51461108
>Impplying a Panerai is meant to fit under the cuffs
What's an affordable movement that's more accurate than Quartz?
>>51461248
Nothing is more accurate than quartz unless you want a giant fucking atomic clock on your wrist.
>>51461248
You could get a radio controlled quartz.
>>51460380
That is a beautiful pocket watch
Tell me why I shouldn't buy a fake patek or a Rolex right now?
>>51461248
Look into Seiko spring drive
>>51460907
>panerai fangirls making memes out of themselves
Try wearing it around the neck so maybe sombody will notice.
>>51461296
Thanks, it's a communist stopwatch.
>>51460907
I don't get why anyone likes watches that big. It looks pretty silly, and it would restrict hand movement.
>>51461368
Because you could get a much better Seiko. Orient, etc.
>>51461368
Why not buy an affordable watch that wasn't made in India and won't collapse in a month? Far more respectable to get a midrange to cheap real watch then some knockoff
>>51460907
I can see where the crown digs into your hand.
>be lefty
>feels good man
>>51461368
Same reason you shouldn't wear a fake Louis Vuitton belt or Cartier love bracelet etc.
The people who know you know what you can afford. Even if it's a great fake nobody will believe it's real and you'll look like a replica wearing loser
Also, a big part of wearing a watch is knowing you could afford what you're wearing. Maybe I'm not phrasing that correctly, but the point is when I look at the Seiko on my wrist, I see a real, well built watch that inhad enough disposable income to afford. It was only $150 or so, but it's still an extravagance I bought for myself. If I were wearing a fake Rolex, I'd be checking my time on a lie, trying to project an image of someone more valuable than I actually am. It's just a shitty way to approach life, it screams insecurity.
>>51461458
>>51461425
>>51461108
>>51461842
It looks just as silly on him.
>tfw just bought this and now I have to wait for it to ship
>>51460380
>tfw no glorious slava rattrapante
>>51461902
>buying communist made, lower quality hunk of steel
Into the trash it goes
>>51461942
Stop with the elitist bs,this is no place for it.
>>51461906
Looks pretty cool.
>>51461942
>being an edgelord on the interbutts
did gram-gram let you use her imac?
>>51461942
>every board is /b/
Best digital watch? Not looking for a G-Shock or Bin Laden watch.
>>51462131
Apple Watch or Moto 3602.
I spent more on my watches than I have on my car or house downpayment.
>>51462199
>mommy bought you your toyota
>renting
Confirmed.
>>51462199
That is not a wise decision.
this is on massdrop RIGHT NOW!!
https://www.massdrop.com/buy/aevig-valkyr-watch?referer=9SCH3K
>>51462625
>400 euros
>miyota movement
literally shite
>>51462131
I advise you go vintage, some really cool Citizen and Seiko ones from the 70s and 80s are available for really cheap sometimes.
https://www.massdrop.com/buy/seiko-monster?referer=9SCH3K
>>51462625
It looks so good but >>51462713 is right. It costs $440CDN and I can't justify that for a 9015.
Pic related is my meme-plorer
>>51462713
>>51463267
$330USD here
>>51461435
I am honored to have inspired such a wise purchase.
What's ironic about this thing is it's actually been tremendously helpful to me, the capitalist accountant. Gotta keep track of dem billables.
>>51463284
I my dollar wasn't shit right now I'd already ordered it.
The start of this year the CDN was almost par with the Yankee-dollar
>>51463306
I use it for my chem labs sometimes. It is pretty useful.
I want to eventually get a mechanical chronograph, but right now those are a bit out of my price range.
>>51463372
I can see how this would be useful for chem. My brother's doing a chemistry major and he has a university-issued "Electric Chink" stopwatch.
I actually do not really have much desire for a chronograph. While my job requires me to time a series of tasks in 0.10 hour intervals, ie the perfect chronograph job, I hate most of them due to the busy factor. I also like being able to wear a variety of watches from day to day. The stopwatch allows me to do that.
A Seiko 6138 like the OP pic would work brilliantly, beautiful watch, shame about the ticking time bomb movement. This Stowa's also nice.
>>51463310
The shitty Canadian dollar didn't stop me from ordering this at $309 USD.
Make more dollars, buddy. With the Socialists running the show, we're not going to see parity again for a while.
>>51463562
>socialists running the show
if only
How can I sync my radio-controlled if I live outside radio range
>>51464095
You probably can't, and they have poor accuracy for a quartz on their own.
My first automatic!
Thoughts?
Inb4 Swatch Dogshit.
>>51464620
nice fake
Sup guys, I'm looking for a Submariner type clone for like $200-$300. I know Invicta makes one but I've heard they're kind of shoddy. Any suggestions?
>>51464870
Soki
>>51464870
Tisell 9015.
Ceramic Bezel, Miyota 9015 movement, good QC and customer service.
Less than $200.
Comes in Green, Blue and Black; but they will do custom combinations for no extra charge.
>>51464911
Can you get those with a metal band?
>>51464953
http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-SOKI-Black-Self-Winding-Analog-Automatic-Date-Mens-Mechanical-Band-Watch-W86-/400791289257
$20, but you will regret every cent of it.
>>51464659
Thanks, ya penis.
Also, movement.
>>51464953
It came on a metal band that sucked.
The watch itself isn't bad for $15, but the bracelet was awful.
>>51465003
Oh sweet jesus
>>51465039
That's why I picked a $200-$300 price range. I want something cheap but relatively nice. That might be a little too cheap.
>>51464934
Who retails Tisell watches?
>>51465085
Only Tisell themselves; they're a very small Korean brand, but they've built a good reputation for themselves, especially with their customer service (custom orders, paying for return shipping if there's an issue, supplying Korea only watches at a request).
Tisell.kr
>Korean only site, but they have a few designs here that aren't available internationally - worth a look to see their full catalog - they will send you a watch from this site if you contact them via email.
Tisellkr.com
>International site; easier to use/order - you might have issues using the desktop web page to order (I had to use my phone for my last watch).
>>51465158
You could try to make the shilling a little less obvious, Sang Hyun.
>>51465158
Hmm. Will research, thanks.
>>51465178
>You could try to make the shilling a little less obvious, Sang Hyun.
If it was my website, why the fuck wouldn't I have fixed the desktop version of the website?
I just like cheap watches and I hate fucking dealing with shitty customer service.
Looking to get my first Seiko for everyday usage so preferably not too dressy and huge, lume and waterproof are a plus.
So SARB033 or SARX015?
>>51465327
ALPINIST
Thoughts on the SARB021?
>>51465377
No, the hands are ugly.
>>51465417
>Not liking owlpenis hands.
It's not my fault you have shit taste.
>>51464911
>overpriced kraut gun
>literal shit tier $5 chink watch
all of my wut
>>51465379
I think it's a SARB. Look the SARB series are great watches for their price point and they all have the same movement so just pick the one you like the looks of most.
>>51460907
I don't understand /g/'s hate-boner for Panerai. European history, in-house Swiss ETA movement and their design language looks fresh compared to Tudor or Rolex. What more do you want?
Is it only me or does the SARX look very angular?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxNnC3qRgLw
>>51465483
Panerai does have some in-house movements but ETA is not in-house. ETA is owned by the Swatch Group and Panerai is owned by Richemont. Also they are ridiculously overpriced. They charge $5,000 USD for a Unitas 6497 movement while I can get a watch from Steinhart with the same base movement for about $400 USD. A slightly longer power reserve and COSC certification is not worth $4,600 more.
>>51465579
It does.
>>51465379
it looks pretty nice, I'd buy it honestly..
>>51465417
this
>>51465379
No lume?
>>51465579
I'm pretty sure there is an Omega Seamaster that looks exactly like that, complete with the textured dial.
>>51465643
You're probably thinking of the aqua terra.
>>51465158
Kek, they even have a Nomos "homage".
>>51465705
The design has been around for about 80-90 years now, it's not surprising that there will be homages, but AFAIK the Tisell is the only one with a Miyota movement - the rest use either quartz or Seagull movements.
>>51465725
AFAIK, the one Seagull used is a better movement than the 9015 no?
>>51465737
No, they both handwind and hack, but the Miyota is a high BPH movement.
>>51465705
any GMTs in this bauhaus style?
preferably mechanic.
>>51465768
No, unfortunately. They only have a black version of the same model in their web store.
>>51465768
Nomos is basically your only option.
>>51465768
Nomos Tangomat GMT and Zurich Worldtimer are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.
Many watches pay "homage" to the Rolex Submariner, but was Rolex the original producer of that design?
Many divers have similar aspects, but I mean that exact design with that typeface on the bezel and everything.
>>51465655
That's the one indeed.
>>51465913
>>51465327
I prefer the sword hands of the SARB.
>>51465920
There's a bit of resemblance I guess, but I think it still looks much more like a Seiko than an Omega. If it was consciously meant to be a homage then I think it's pretty much exactly how a homage should be.
>>51466001
The hour hand in pic related is a sword, the hands on a SARB are dauphine.
>>51464911
How can chinks afford to make automatic movement for less than $10?
>>51466096
They work for $1 per hour,not everyone is america.
>>51465483
Most of /wt/ are too poor to afford one so their hate is based on subjective rather than objective metrics.
michael kors
black face
roman numerals
So do you guys have dailies for like motox, surfing, skating, biking, gliding or other outdoor shit where watch brand/style isn't a concern?
Might seem like a thinly veiled question, but it's not. I'm not rich enough to take my triple sensor Casio _everywhere_ but I'm thinking about a tough piece of shit that isn't a memelelxD F91.
>>51466414
>triple sensor Casio
What like a Pro Trek? That stuff is the kind of shit those watches were made for.
>>51466392
>>51466414
Yeah bro, try looking into this brand called Richard Mille . They make some sick sports style light watches.
What is /wt/s opinion of ArchieLuxury?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BITWrPYasGs
>>51466456
>>51466617
Welcome to the general anon.
Enjoy your stay
>>51465327
how about a sarg003
>>51461906
neat. i'm guessing those are pretty rare?
>>51462131
>Best digital watch?
the answer is always zeitwerk
This has been sitting in the cart for way too long.
Soon however you will be mine you elusive beauty
>>51466929
>you save $220
no you don't
>>51466929
At this point I'd just wait for these new divers with the better movement to come out.
>>51465327
Goddamnit, SARX, how is this even a question
>>51466749
Stop making me even more confused. ;_;
I also discovered the SARX017. The red accent on the second hand is pretty.
>>51465586
I agree that it's incredibly overpriced (although more justified with the models using the in-house movements), but I don't think people really care about overpriced when they can afford a 5k+$ luxury item, and most of them won't care about the movements, they'll just want it for the design anyway, which is also a good reason to drop that much money, as there is almost no homage (excluding shitty chinese knock-offs) of Panerai watches
rate 'em or hate 'em
>>51467014
But I dig the retro dial of the SKX007 and how the bezel sort of points inwards.
>>51466749
How do you even use the compass on your watch?
>>51467252
boring/10
>>51467261
>retro
Nigga that >>51467014 is literally a remake of an old watch.
>>51467014
>>51467298
Won't they be more expensive though? I can probably find a 007 or 009 for like $150 and who's to say they won't retail for the MSRP when they come out?
>>51467252
Isn't the watch on the left a SARX015 but with different hands?
>>51461842
>box_of_dogshit.jpg
I wish he'd post here, I'd love to see a bunch of overweight/skinny NEET neckbeards rip Arnie a new one for having a worse collection than any one of us.
>>51467345
See: >>51467132
>>51467438
>any of us
Sorry, not everyone is interested in seeing your 5 seikos
>>51466414
The PRG-270 is kinda affordable at around $150, if you can afford proper equipment for those outdoor activities you can afford this watch. Unless you don't live in the first world, then it sucks to be you.
>>51467572
Get back to the gym you old kraut, your pecs are sagging down to your knees.
>>51466456
Fashion "watch"
>>51467591
Why is that guy wearing black gloves. Is it the watch of criminals?
>>51467345
it's a model from the presage line, ref. SRP467J1
some sort of SARX015 replica:
- same case & bracelet
- different dial texture (pic related)
- different movement (4R36 instead of 6R15)
a nice alternative, cheaper and easier to buy outside of japan
>>51468180
That's kind of nice. How does the 4R36 compare to the 6R15? Is it kinda the same thing just with a day wheel?
Also I'm always surprised at how much current Seiko watches are around that I don't know of, Seiko really sucks at marketing this shit.
>Supporting glorious Russia at their fight against Syria with the purchase of an Amphibia.
A-am i good goy wladimir?
>>51468297
I wonder if we buy enough Amphibias we can get the VVS to write "from /wt/ to ISIS, FUCKAS!!!" on one of their bombs.
>>51461681
Lefty here, I have no idea why the fuck would you wear a watch on you right hand. Makes zero sense, pls explain.
>>51466182
Why does most of /wt/ love ALS, then?
Snap, you can only take 1/4 liter of duty free toilet water into India?!
>>51468545
Also JLC boutique was nice enough to give me a catalog when I visited in HKG.
The woman at the Paiget boutique was beautiful though. Even more than the watches.
>>51468561
Halfbreed?
Also that catalog looks like it costs more to make than my Amphibia.
>>51468574
>looks
I'm pretty sure it costs more then both of our Amphibias to make.
>>51461842
They all look like shit.
>>51467132
The red seconds tip isn't worth the downgrade from steel to leather, also the red tip isn't that fitting for that watch
>>51468561
i sometimes wonder if i could just walk into those nice boutiques dressed in jeans and graphic tshirt and wearing my seiko 5 or if i would get laughed out.
>>51464620
I thought about getting this watch but isn't like 51mm or something?
>>51468821
No, it's 42mm.
>>51461842
>Marketing
>Not even once
>>51460907
nice pan bro
check out my bell&ross
>>51468297
They are not fighting against Syria you retard
>>51463516
Oh look, such affordable price and not a single cut off numeral.
>I'm looking at you IWC
>>51460976
of course not, you better purchase a $10k swiss in-house movement watch or that tripfaggot will make you cry calling your watch dogshit.
>>51464620
Mate, but it is swatch dogshit!
>boring dial, very poor finish
>hands look like the designer has been touched as a child
>Bright red seconds hand with that godforsaken T
>Bezel looks cheap, and probably stationary
>Band was produced very cheap, not the tiniest bit of polishing to make it look nice
Look, people like you keep swatch alive and it's bad. I do not care about your money but you could have get a way better looking watch for the same price.
Of course you will feel very insecure with it, since people will not know that you spend 500$ on a watch. So keep the tissot, and good luck with the low selfesteem.
>>51466182
What a load of crap. I bet
>HUURRR TUU PUUR
is your only argument for everything. Well nobody here hates rolex or other, better brands. Panerais look like pure dog feces, that's the only reason to hate them.
This is what £99/$99 gets you.
>>51469487
that bracelet looks so weird.
>>51469487
>Not shitposting on /g/ from your watch
>>51465483
>>51466182
Panerai is probably the single most extreme example of a craven marketing driven mountain jew dollar extraction scheme in modern watchmaking history. They were literally charging several thousands of dollars for cheap off the shelf ETA movements in very simple to make and finish cases.
Someone on /wt/ once maligned Omega by describing them as trying to be 95% of Rolex pricing while putting in 50% of Rolex effort. By that metric Panerai has only put in ~20% of the effort at most. The rest was spent on marketing and celebrity endorsements to honeytrap clueless normies.
>>51466787
>>>51462131
>>Best digital watch?
>the answer is always zeitwerk
Tip top kek
>>51469487
I would rather buy $99 swatch.
>>51467203
>there is almost no homage (excluding shitty chinese knock-offs) of Panerai watches
There is a very good reason for that, and it isn't difficulty since Panerai's designs are not very difficult or expensive to manufacture.
Most people don't aspire to look like douchey tryhard stockbrokers from 2003.
>>51467252
Seikophile/10
>>51469579
Can we now please stop responding to that troll/fangirl?
>Stockbroker
No they wear rolex, like every other person with money and at least some taste.
>>51469701
Did you manage to blissfully avoid that particular craze amongst the aspiring noveau riche? Lucky you. It got so bad at one point that assholes where getting dress shirts made with cuff cutouts for their pams.
>>51469487
If smartwatches are so smart then why do they imitate dumbwatches? You could find some cool way to display time on a screen instead of doing the same thing normal watches have always been doing. I bet they don't even do sweeping second hand movement because muh screen refreshing would would cut few minutes off the already miserable battery life.
Got this in the post yesterday because I wanted something different from my automatics
It's also nice to have something that is (unofficially) water resistant and isn't huge
If your watch doesn't cost at least €25000 then you should kill yourself and find a new hobby like Pokemon card collecting.
>>51469852
Even those can cost quite a lot.
Everytime i open this thread now i get sad because of the scratch on my SKX013 bezel, as you guys said, at least i'll always remember that girl i stood with at the party and shit but it's driving me mad i think i'll buy another bezel.
>>51469877
did you fug her :DDD
if it's only the bezel you can replace it yeah.
>>51469725
They what?...haha, for 5000$ watch, people who suddenly have some money sure are hilarious (and sad).
No i avoided that shit. Here in germany people are shy to show off, they love that understatement shit. I usually hate this, but now i'm glad about it. They show off with cars and houses or expensive traveling. Watches for 5K are not a very good status symbol, cause everybody with a stable income can buy them at some point.
Old pic while it was still a cute watch
>>51469883
No but it's the second time we kissed and shit, maybe on the fourth, i'm kind of shy and she's the second girl i've kissed in my 18 years so...
>>51469852
>having watches as a hobby
lol I'm not a midlife crissis 50yo fatfuck
>>51469819
You were saying that smartwatches can't have sweeping second hand movements?
Steinhart pls. They had to waste the Valjoux 7750 to make an homage to a watch that doesn't have the right number of subdials.
They could have replicated a shitton of good vintage watches that originally had the 7750, hell they could have made some "good enough" homages of ones that were Lemania 5100 powered.
TL;DR: Steinhart really blew it with this abomination.
>>51470288
What's the refresh rate of the screen?
>>51470307
Wrong pic. Pic is what they should have remade.
>>51470323
It looks like 60Hz to me.
>>51460311
That Seiko looks tasty. Number?
>>51465417
>>51465612
No, the hands are a shit taste detector. And judging from your posts, they are working perfectly.
>>51468225
I think the 4R36 is closer to its 7S26 roots than the 6R15. Decent movement with less shock protection and a shorter power reserve.
>>51468336
>>51468297
Maybe if we buy enough Amphibias, we can get a /wt/ Tupolev Tu-95 after the war is over, in recognition of our contributions to the war effort against the ISIS nogs.
>>51470372
So your so called "smooth" seconds hand on your supposedly state of the art consumer-mounted tracking device is exactly six times as twitchy as a watch from fifty-five years ago?
Now that's what I call progress!
Why am I seeing a lack of Rolex in this thread? It's the obviously dominant race.
>>51468374
The same reason righties wear watches on their left hand. To keep your dominant hand unencumbered.
>>51470288
Wow anon that screen was on for almost four seconds
When smartphones have AMOLED screens that are always on and last 36+ hours, I'm in. Until then old timey watches plus miband
>>51470940
No to mention the buggy shit was showing the time it was previously pressed at for the first frame, before updating the screen to the actual time.
What a piece of shit, if I look even at my F-91W it shows the current time immediately, not the time I last glanced at it.
>>51466456
jacob
>job interview last week
>owner jokes how he spent his first money on a Rolex as he was starting out
>looks at my watch as he says this
>it's a Citizen
On a scale of 1 to 10 how fucked was I?
I got the job though
>>51471157
He spent his money foolishly, you didn't (lol citizen notwithstanding)
Sounds fine to me faggot
A watch.
>>51471157
>job interview about a month ago
>wearing muh penisquartz
>one of the company owners, a guy who is making hundreds of thousands of dollars, is wearing a Casio A158W
>he looks to my watch and says "Allah fi Alssama, is that a meme watch produced by the Jap alkuffar?"
>I respond "Hai, sou desu ne, Musurimu-chan~"
>The Korean IT guy comes in, he's wearing a Tisell
>He screams "미요 타 9015은 모든 한심한 움직임을 분쇄 할 것이다!" at the top of his lungs
>I remind him how the Jap needed to provide the movement so the Koreans could accomplish anything, just like in 1910
>His whole face turns red as the honour of his country has been sullied
>Everyone gets on the floor walks the dinosaur
>Got offer next day
I'd say you're going to have a good time, so long as the Citizen you were wearing was either an automatic or a Hisonic.
>>51470516
It's a Seiko 6138. Beautiful, beautiful watches, but there is a very small, very important, and very delicate part that controls the chronograph function, and unless the chronograph has been left running for the better part of 40 years, it WILL break.
>>51471351
And sadly there's nothing that even looks close to it made today. If you want a chrono, it has to be with at least 20 subdials and thousands of number markers.
>>51470516
6138-300x
>>51471157
Get a Grand Seiko Spring Drive in a couple of months and show it to him, maybe he'll like it. Or just buy a Sub and suck his dick.
Are mvmt watches any good? I ordered this one, it'll probably come on Monday.
It was either >>51471575 or this. I figured the silver and black would go with more things.
>>51471611
>>51471575
>>51471554
>Being that much of a beta
Just do your job well and don't be a faggot to him. He couldn't care less about his watch, you autistic mouth breather.
What's the difference between the 4r36 and the 7s26?
Is it just the hacking/hand wind on the 4r36?
I notice the new monsters have been upgraded.
>>51471575
>>51471611
They're pretty good for the price. Nice and minimal. The only thing I can tell you is to stay with the leather straps.
>>51471674
Why?
>>51471630
>>51471662
afaik 7s26 has some plastic parts and i think they solved that in the 4r36 (?)
>>51471387
Is Seiko even aware of how much money they could make if they re-issued the 6138 with a 6S28 movement?
>>51471708
you mean they could sell 2 watches to a couple of autists from 4chan
Hey kids! What do we call somebody who interacts with
>trolls
>panerai posts
>smartwatch post
?
>filthy newfag!
Exactly, please keep that in mind and avoid being related to these in any way.
>>51471692
>45mm
>random cheapass quartz movt.
>date window has literally no finish at all, looks cheap af
>100$
I admit that it looks good but that's not really /g/, more like /fa/
>>51471708
Knowing Japanese companies, probably not.
>>51471696
There really isn't much difference, iirc. The 4R36 is basically a 7S26 that's had hacking and hand winding added on top. It's not like the 6R15, where yes the base plate is the same as the 7S26, but just about everything else is different.
>>51471741
>it looks good
not really
but at least the date window is color matched to the dial :^)
friendly reminder that only faggots, autists and manchildren wear these and you guys are macfag-tier consumerist retards.
>>51471662
Those two features, usually of higher quality and less plastic involved. Power reserve is also longer. I'm not quite sure, but as far as i recall it also has better shock protection?
But it's also made by malasiyan children, but those who have slightly steadier hands and are better fed.
Though i prefer the orphaned japanese schoolgirls that assemble Orient watches and plesure Seiko-Epson executives for a part time job over skinny and starving Malaysians.
>>51471708
They could make a profit, but right now they have more then enough shekels to swim in.
>>51471696
>>51471769
Ok thanks. It will be great to be able to handwind/hack this one as my knight still has the ol' 7s26.
>>51471808
nice meme! :^)
>>51471831
> i spend more than 10$ on a wristwatch
nice life choices
>>51466414
Just get a rangeman and wear it everywhere. I prefer a mudmaster though.
>>51471851
If buying a watch is a life choice then you're doing something wrong.
Here's your (You)
>>51471739
>>51471751
They re-issued that watch from Aliens with a shitty quartz movement and people just lapped it up. Sold out more or less instantly. If they did a run of 5,000 6138s, I guarantee they would all be gone in a matter of minutes.
Is there a real yellow F-91W or is this virgin wearing a fake?
>>51471880
>looks tiny even on the spookiest of skeletons
>>51460524
>>51471831
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>51471880
Other pic I have to link instead, since this is a SFW board:
http://cache.rk.com/rk/pure18/faces/rikki.pick1.jpg
Looks like it even has the Casio logo in the upper left corner.
>>51471917
isn't it called a chevron?
>>51471932
frankly i dont give a fuck what its called
I heard a lot of complaints about the steel bracelet of the SARB033/035. Are they true?
>>51460311
>>51471777
They actually don't. When you get them, the date window is white, so after seeing the pictures they have and getting the actual watch, your autism might be triggered.
>>51471946
>logo literally explosive diarrhea
>>51471876
but this doesn't have the pop culture link
And another one showing the watch from a better angle, also NSFW. She's a virgin btw.
http://cache.rk.com/rk/pure18/faces/rikki.pick3.jpg
>>51471905
It's 35mm, f@m.
Time for sinkdiving
>>51471810
I really wish Seiko would just take the 7S26 out behind the shed and shoot it. Or at least stop using it in anything above the $60 Seiko 5s. Things would be much better if the SNZG and the SKX were using a 4R36.
>>51471876
You do know the original was also quartz right?
>>51471880
>tfw i will never have this
Might as well end it now
>>51472020
the watch or the girl?
>>51471993
>She's a virgin btw.
yep, as proven by the porn site logo in the pictures. you went to college with her too?
Post your beater
>>51472031
Yes, I did, actual-autist kun.
>>51472028
the girl.
gold plated autism watch is 5$ in the local market.
>>51472020
lmao you're disgusting if you're into such white trash
>>51472051
>>51471918
>>51471993
does she has booty?
Yes. Yes she do.
Though why do those tities seem fake?
>>51471998
>Things would be much better if the SNZG and the SKX were using a 4R36.
Yup.
>>51472051
Either this fella here or a blue Ray.
>>51472092
I'm sorry anon i just never had the sex.
>>51472087
I have the art film, it's not gold, just yellow. Flat yellow plastic case and rubber strap.
>>51471945
Really?
I own a SARB017 so I don't have any experience with the metal bracelet, but I've heard nothing but praise for it. The only possible complaint I could think of is the lack of a double-locking clasp. Where did you hear these "complaints"?
