>Atom

>>51449385
I'm really excited for new Atoms desu
I want to see a 10w Atom desktop SKU, that shit would be great.

The 14nm cherry trail atom chips were already breddy good. If these have a higher IPC they could compete with chips like the exynos 7420.

Can it beat A9X?

>>51451507
All atom chips beat the A9X. No matter how much you overclock the A9X, it will never be able to run OS X or any x86 programs.

>>51451530
Like Atom can never run iOS and ARM programs?

>>51449385

I have a Dell Venue 8 Pro, Baytrail-T actually performs really well. I was really surprised that thing could actually run WoW at native rez almost playably. Good performance in browsers too. In comparison the old netbooks I used to own were slower than dogshit

>>51451592
>what are VMs

>>51451622
>there are no x86 VMs for ARM

>>51451646
>there are no x86 VMs for ARM
They suck balls though. Even on a high end smartphone emulating xp is painfully slow. You'd need a 5GHz A9X to emulate OS X properly.

>>51451705
Atom sucks at emulation as hard, try to run Dolphin on it. If only there was a proper ARM desktop with A9X performance to play with to see what can it do.

>>51451747
Depends which atom. The x5 and x7 cherry trail atoms are pretty cash.

>>51451790
>Depends which atom.
Which begs my original question before your shitposting.
>>51451507
How will the new Atoms compare to ARM state of art.

>>51451861
RISC shill pls go

>>51451883
>CISC
>b-but muh microcode is not stolen RISC ideas