ITT we post things /g/ loves that are actually fucking horrible.

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2015-10-12 13:45:01 Post No. 50773144
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: dd-wrt-starter.png (48 KB, 820x659) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 13:45:01 Post No. 50773144 [Report]

ITT we post things /g/ loves that are actually fucking horrible.
Pic very related. Use Tomato or OpenWRT, at least those actually work correctly.

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 13:45:35 Post No.50773150
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 13:45:35 Post No.50773150 [Report]

File: download.jpg (6 KB, 217x232) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 217x232

>>

JGhost@G4 2015-10-12 13:57:38 Post No.50773280
[Report]

JGhost@G4 2015-10-12 13:57:38 Post No.50773280 [Report]

>>50773144
>STP
>On a WAN link
Is this 1992?

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:03:45 Post No.50773349
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:03:45 Post No.50773349 [Report]

>>50773150
Autotragic fag detected.
Enjoy falling asleep while driving.

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:33:50 Post No.50773678
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:33:50 Post No.50773678 [Report]

foobar2000

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:08 Post No.50773688
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:08 Post No.50773688 [Report]

>>50773144
AMEN

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:37 Post No.50773692
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:37 Post No.50773692 [Report]

It works for me and I don't see your point.

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:40 Post No.50773693
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:35:40 Post No.50773693 [Report]

GNU slash Linux

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:37:26 Post No.50773712
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:37:26 Post No.50773712 [Report]

File: linux.jpg (69 KB, 444x444) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 444x444

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:38:33 Post No.50773733
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:38:33 Post No.50773733 [Report]

>>50773692
Every router I've had the displeasure of using DD-WRT on has had issues at some point. Either it drops the connections, gives vague error messages (if any at all), disables the web UI constantly, etc. QoS was especially shitty on DD-WRT.
If you don't do a lot with your router it'll work fine, but after that it's a buggy mess. The only virtue DD-WRT has is that it's very widely supported.

>>

/flt/ friendly Linux 2015-10-12 14:39:05 Post No.50773738
[Report] Image search: [Google]

/flt/ friendly Linux 2015-10-12 14:39:05 Post No.50773738 [Report]

File: 1440028086828.jpg (16 KB, 320x371) Image search: [Google]

16 KB, 320x371

>>50773349
>not realizing he meant transmission

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:40:38 Post No.50773760
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:40:38 Post No.50773760 [Report]

>>50773144
except nobody on /g/ ever even talks about dd-wrt, and they love tomato and openwrt.
Reddit thread confirmed!

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:41:08 Post No.50773768
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:41:08 Post No.50773768 [Report]

>>50773693
Bait m8

>>

/flt/ friendly Linux 2015-10-12 14:45:19 Post No.50773826
[Report]

/flt/ friendly Linux 2015-10-12 14:45:19 Post No.50773826 [Report]

>>50773760
Asus merlin > all

>>

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:47:29 Post No.50773848
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-10-12 14:47:29 Post No.50773848 [Report]

>>50773144
I agree. I went from using Tomato on my RT-N66U to using DD-WRT on TP-Link WDR3600 when I moved out of my parent's place and setting up QoS was brutal.

Is OpenWRT any easier in setting up QoS?