What do you think they will do /g/?
http://bgr.com/2015/04/30/torrent-sites-vs-movie-studios-copyright-infringement/
>America controls the entire internet
Where do these idiots get these ideas?
I think the pirates will be sensible and take down their sites
...
Seriously is the MPAA retarded?
>living in "free" (tm)(etc) country
>>47772009
They're just so used to getting their way on everything. Here they find themselves with nobody to run to and no congresscritter to pay off who will just make the problem go away. And they've somehow convinced themselves that this problem is costing them some obscenely large amount of billions per year.
please
China has been trying to do it for years, it's still possible to share content.
Including this website? Lel.
Good job promoting distributed anonymous meshnets, Hollywood.
>>47772080
Those dumb fucks are probably losing more money paying all those vampire lawyers to "pursue all remedies possible" constantly.
Hollywood is fucking retarded.
>>47772083
They're not doing it right then.
Do all production work on encrypted, airgapped systems with no USB ports, to prevent employees leaking movies. Distribute them to theaters in armored vehicles escorted by full SWAT teams so nobody can steal a copy there. Replace the big screen with tiny devices that project the movie directly onto your retina, and supervise all use of them, to prevent recording devices. Stop showing movies on TV, streaming them over the Internet, or releasing them on DVD/Blu-Ray, as these are inherently stealable.
>>47772212
This.
They need to film everything in secret locations directly to encrypted drives, then destroy the drives immediately. Checkmate, pirates.
>>47772301
This is even better. Never let anyone outside the studio see the actual movie.
They could still release them in theaters and on DVD, but it would just consist of some trailers for upcoming movies, followed by a notice that due to antipiracy measures the film cannot be displayed on this screen.
Then someone else could optimize the process by realizing that it's only necessary to produce trailers rather than full length films, cutting production costs tremendously.
>>47772212
>recording devices
Like the brain?
>>47772454
We don't yet have a way to dump that back into a format you can pirate though. Besides a braindump of a movie would lose a lot in terms of quality and details.
I was thinking of a camera fitted out with a lens to make it focus the image.
>>47771985
Fuck the MPAA
>>47772940
No. That will only create little baby MPAAs.
>>47771985
>》 shut down 4 24hrs cause I need a break then turn back on I comply ed now fu off Hollywood
>>47772995
The letter does say "disable permanently".
>>47771985
Lol they're so cute when they get angry
Oh no, what will I do without such quality movies as Avengers 7 and Terminator 25.
>>47772212
What is the best way to bring down the entire media entertainment business?
jewnazi plz go
>>47771985
>torrents
Since when was the internet policed? Wasn't the internet designed to be free for everyone? When did all these 'rules' about downloading shit come into effect?
>>47771985
>blaming piracy on the utter shit quality of 98% of movies in the last 3 years
>>47772212
The cost of doing this (if it's even possible), would far eclipse the "costs" of piracy. Of course, the costs associated with all these legal processes far eclipse those of piracy too, so I don't see why they wouldn't go for it. They're easily that fucking retarded.
>>47773536
It's all Progressivism. Through
>muh terrorism!
>muh CP!
>muh piracy!
They seek to police the internet and obtain total control. Recently "muh slow lanes/ISP corruption!" was also added to the toolset.
>>47773780
It's not about terrorists and CP and piracy, it's about control. The internet remains a free environment, and so they feel threatened by it.
>>47773801
Are you retarded? That's exactly what he said.
>>47773834
I was in the middle of writing it when I saw it, and so I cited him saying I was agreeing with him. I can see how that could be misinterpreted.
they will cry on the internet how piracy kills companies, when nobody shuts down their sites
The bolice should do something about people who copy other peoples websites or typosquad only to extort the owner of the original.
muh lost sales
http://www.fastcompany.com/1146469/youtube-monty-python-videos-boost-dvd-sales-23000
>>47773546
Shitty movies are from shitty plebs with shit tastes.
Rehashed bromance movies over and over. Forever.
I wonder if this is related to Grooveshark shutdown??
>>47771985
Maybe they slipped money under the table to the Russian mafia and others who have control over large botnets, and have them DDOS all the sites
>>47771985
>any movie popular in America
>worth watching
>not just using Netflix if you have to
>using torrents for anything
>ever
Still, it makes me a little mad. How can they be so successful in their jewish schemes? When will the world realize sharing isn't bad?
>>47776849
>When will the world realize sharing isn't bad?
We'd need to find a good way of paying artists without trying to treat copies of their work as a scare commodity.
>>47772009
America does, though. You can be extradited from anywhere in the world to be tried and convicted on American ground. Have you not been watching the news?
>>47776966
Most moderately wealthy people like say your Joe Rogans and Kevin Smiths are either indifferent or ignore this sort of thing.
The people who tend to complain the most about this sort of thing are old mega rich assholes.
>>47777001
Watch Joe Rogan podcast interview with Paul Stanley, he definitely support piracy in the sense that he doesn't see it as comparable to stealing.
>>47777224
Yeah I'm not sure if Joe is "pro piracy" but he doesn't seem to see any particular problem with it. He's said in later podcasts that he thinks Paul Stanley is just an old man who doesn't understand how things are now.
I think his argument was something like equating it to recording a song off the radio on a cassette tape.
>>47777224
i think its like a marihuana thing, implying that suddenly they have this new business "suing pirates". Pirate is a word that was used to described people who copied a movie to re-sell it.
So by definition, a Pirate is the first leaker-uploader of the movie. The rest are sharers.
However, somehow they figured it makes more economical sense to persecute the sharers, as they are many, so, more trials = more money.
Is a dead end discussion, its exactly like persecuting stoners to stop weed, i mean, those are the already lost cases, you should go to the distribution point, so the stoners don't multiply, not just clean the stoners and feel done.
Unless you want something to do tomorrow as well.
Probably harass them with petty stuff.
>>47777255
>Pirate is a word that was used to describe people who copied a movie to re-sell it
>So by definition, a Pirate is the first leaker-uploader of the movie
>The rest are sharers
No, by definition, the first uploader is also a sharer because he/she is not selling or profiting from the upload but rather freely distributing it, possibly at his/her own expense.
