Python vs Ruby
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Tell me /g/, which one is better and why?
>>43689987
python.
Is this even a question?
Whichever one fits your requirements, and if the requirements are equally suited to both, whichever you are personally more comfortable and productive with.
I don't want to.
>>43689987
ruby is fucking best. it respects your freedoms and own style
>>43689987
>>43689997
>>43690057
>Gotta pretend to argue with myself, they're not falling for it.
>>43690075
this
stop samefagging OP, everyone knows Python is superiorfrom masterrace import python
Ruby = deprecated
/thread
>>43689987
python for scripting, java for webdev
>>43690125
>Damn they got me, best pretend to agree but drop in an argument. No one will no I'm the OP!
>>43690075
its not me, man
What a shit thread.
>>43689987
RAILS, CAN YOU RAILS IN PYTHON. NO YOU CANT RAILS IN PYTHON.
RUBY = WIN
SLASH THREAD
>>43690468
HAHA LAST POST I WIN RUBY > PYTHON FOREVER.
RAILS IS THE BEST, FUCK YOU I REST.
>>43689987
First I was like "Ruby, because it has a nice embeddable implementation", but then I remembered that MRuby required Rake to build.
Language wise, they are both meeh, but still better than Perl every second.
If you can, use Julia.
>>43690468
>>43690583
Kill you're selfs.
>>43689997
why is Python better?
i know and use Python myself and haven't tried Ruby, but from what i gathered, it seems as good as Python while being somewhat more powerful language (minus some of Python's simplicity).
only using "end" is ugly, but that is just a matter of taste (and i also considered using whitespace awkward before trying Python)
>>43690671
it just is
>>43690612
Jesus fuck.
The English language lies dead at your feet, your trilby and waistcoat splattered with loose grammar and your own smug spittle.
python comma because ruby makes you spell out your punctuation comma which makes your code hard to read full stop or period if you are american
Ruby = new Pascal
Python = easier C
the choice is yours
>>43690468
Django
>>43690856
>Python = easier C
hahahahaha, what?
>>43690752
Kill you are selves.
>>43690888
yep, Python is power of C combined with ease of use
it's pretty simple to write simple programs and takes some time to do more complex apps
Python has more libs and it's community is bigger
Ruby community has better standards and I find the language to be more beautiful (specially when avoiding metaprogramming)
>>43690912
>yep, Python is power of C combined with ease of use
>Python has the power of C -> no abstractions, retarded undefined behavior that can't even be used in modern compilers
>combined with ease of use
brrr
>>43690912
you are a moron. i've used Python for ten years. i've done everything from GTK+, Django, PyGame, numpy, OpenGL, Google WAE, even Jython, and EVEN Python 1.5 on an old CDMA chip (most retarded idea a manufacturer ever had,) and not that anyone gives a shit about this, but, even PyPy.
Python is not C. You're retarded. Your comparison is retarded. I don't mean to be mean, but I don't want anyone else reading your ignorant post and believing it.
>>43690972
but what he said made more sense.
can you elaborate?
>>43690912
>it's pretty simple to write simple programs and takes some time to do more complex apps
>simple things take some time done and things that are more complex than simple things take more time
>>43691010
I couldn't even read that.
>>43691010
The way it should be.
As oppose to C where simple things take more time and complex things take forever
>>43689987
They are both dogshit, still better than Perl.
>>43691010
writing not so complex program in C and Python takes similiar amount of time and both of them are easy to do it (but Python is even more readable and easier)
>#include <mommy.h>
vs
>import mommy
when it's about writing complex apps, then it for sure takes much more time, but it's still easy to write (I mean in Python)
C may be pain in ass when it comes to do some game or "Swans" player, Python is not
>>43691492
>bait.png
>hook with no bait
>>43691499
trollink is an art
>>43689987
Military grade reply bait
>>43690695
This is the true spirit of /g/ arguments
>>43690972
>hi i've used python since 2004
>i've done everything there needs to be done, even finding a real python and stuffing it into a usb port
>you're a moron and you're a retard
>i hope i didn't hurt your feelings :^)
>PLEASE DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT THIS GUY SAYS
yeah yeah old guy, i'm pretty sure he didn't literally mean something like
#include C
python = C.simplified
if you can't even differentiate a scripting language and nonscripting language you'd really stay clear of /g/ and go back to reddit, amirite? no harm done in this simple and harmless, albeit absurdly wrong abstraction.
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
This is Coke vs Pepsi. At least argue about languages that are meaningfully different.
>>43689987
Ruby, if only because it doesn't have internal fights over which version you should be using- muh v2.7/v3.x
When will bad developers stop writing desktop applications in bad, slow languages like Python, /g/?
>>43693452
As soon as they have to pay for errors and freezes.
That will slow and insecure shit make go away.
>>43693452
Most people don't use Python for this purpose at all
>>43693452
Desktop applications are deprecated except for lovingly-created Cocoa ones.
I think Ruby is the better language because you can almost do everything is with it (except macros but that will always be a Lisp domain).
The problem is that Ruby can never beat Python because every math academic has learned Python. The excuse for that is that "it is so easy". Therefore the students of those academics will learn Python again.
PHP > Ruby > Python.
Your arguments are invalid.
>>43694144
Julia > Lua > Self > Dart > Perl > Tcl > Javascript > PHP > Ruby > Python
You're argument is invalid.
>>43691798
>says the pythonist, a language with conventions as bad as PHP
http://simononsoftware.com/naming-convention-aka-php-vs-python/
RUBY > PYTHON
RAILS ITS ALL ABOUT THE RAILS DOES PYTHON HAVE RAILS NO I DIDNT THINK SO.`
The author of Python works for Google.
The author of Ruby is approved by Stallman.
You tell me.
>>43690671
Search for:
>ruby C++
and
>Python C++
Only one of these can easily execute other code. Ruby is a pain.
>>43691000
No, because he is stupid.
>>43694338
>Julia
Tell me about Julia. Why she wears that mask.
>>43694824
>>43694824
THIS VAGINA FUCKER KNOWS WHATS UP.
ONLY TRUE BROGRAMMERS USE RAILS BABY.
RAILS > RUBY > PYHTON
FUCK RUBY RAILS FER DAAAAAYYYSSSSSS RUBYWITHOUTRAILS.GOV
