How do you accurately log exercise when you're on the treadmill for speeds that don't end in 0 or 5? For instance, let's say you did 20 minutes at 3.9. There's no listing for 3.9. Can you use math? For instance,
3.9 mi/h * 20 min / 60min/h = 1.3 miles
1.3 mi / 3.5 mi/h * 60 min/h = 22.29 minutes
Is that accurate from a caloric standpoint? That is, is walking 20 minutes at 3.9 mph the equivalent of walking 22.29 minutes at 3.5 mph?
I dont know
>>37488962
perhaps
Can you repeat rhe question
>>37488962
Maybe
>>37488962
You probably use more energy when you are faster, because your body heats faster and uses oxygen faster, so the process of de-heating and transfering oxygen to your muscles ends up using more energy
>>37488962
If you look only at calories consumption, the only 2 figures you need are bodyweight and distance, time is irrelevant. By walking you burn 0.4999999 kcalories per kg of bodyweight for each kilometer walked. By running you burn 0.999999 kcalories per kg of bodyweight for each kilometer run.
By the way, OP, your question reveals you're kind of an anal nutbag. But a good kind of anal nutbag. I like you, OP.
>when you're on the treadmill
Nope.
>>37489372
wtf? you just contradicted yourself in the same paragraph
>>37489324
YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME NOW
>>37489372
literally retarded
>>37488962
It's literally a linear equation. It's not that hard.
>>37488962
>cos(x)
quick, someone write a proposal and get some funding for this shit
>>37489372
Thats nice of you Anon, you made OP not seem as moronic
http://www.runnersworld.com/weight-loss/how-many-calories-are-you-really-burning?page=single
Apparently, most walking will burn the same amount of calories over the same distance, until you get to super fast speeds where you should be running instead. Running in general burns more calories than walking, because your body is doing more work with the up and down motion.
