>"calories in calories out : ^ )"
>ignoring thousands of years of studies showing far more complex realities
L M A O
>ignoring the survey conducted by literally BILLIONS of people that says otherwise
Fuck off goy
>>37426150
this is just a sad attempt
>>37426150
Ignoring the literally TRILLIONS of American dept to the low-lying countries in exchange for their advanced fat accumulation research
The only people who say "cal in cal out doesn't work" are the people who have never tried it
>>37426150
True, you have to account for race and gender etc. in tailoring a diet.
>>37426150
>thousands of years of studies
the scientific method hasn't existed for a thousand years, jackass
>>37426219
Tell that to Eratosthenes, faggot.
>"1+1 = 2 : ^ )"
>ignoring thousands of years of studies showing far more complex realities
LMAO
>>37426473
1+1=2 is literally only a fact because normies had to learn to read and do math all of a sudden
>>37426150
>implying you'll break the laws of physics
>not understanding what calories in calories out really means
>>37426150
calories in, calories out is the most important thing for fat loss but that doesn't mean it's healthy -- you could be missing out on a lot of essential lipids, vitamins, and minerals if you only count calories with disregard for the nutritional value of the food you eat.
>>37426393
What are you talking about? Eratosthenes didn't use the scientific method, the scientific method was invented by Francis Bacon in the 1600's.
>>37426503
Idiotic oversimplification.
>>37426508
No, it's not. There was no established method of empiricism prior to Bacon, which is the basis of the scientific method.
OP here, literally tricked all of you kek.
>>37426598
haha you got us :PPP
>>37426150
Show me the study from 1016
>>37426150
>looking for excuses to stay fat
>ignoring millions of people who lost weight by cutting calories
L M A O
There are many processes in the body. cals is just potential energy you consume.
>>37426150
Calorie counting works. I don't believe that the calories listed for foods represents the actual amount of energy you absorb but that doesn't matter
Seriously, is nobody going to mention that face the chick is making in OP's pic? She certainly didn't like what she saw with the uni-ocular she has on.
>>37427662
It's called a monocular, you tard.
>>37427960
>monocular
it's a single-ocular, idiot.
