>>37341195
There's are thousands of kinds of bread, how is this even a comparison?

rice is food of poor asians
bread is food of civilized white men who built western civilization

how is this even a question?

>>37341235
tell me, how can a billion asians be wrong

File: rice-v-bread.png (9 KB, 623x112) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 623x112

>>37341195
had this handy

>>37341321
A million flies eat shit, how could they be wrong? This is a famous quote by the way

>>37341321
eating rice lead them to shitting in a squatting position and creating imageboards
eating white bread lead white and middle eastern people to starting first civilizations and sending people into space
do whatever you want though

>>37341195
>comparing different units of measurment

It depends
Which flour are you using for the bread? How much gluten in it? How much refined? What's the ratio of ashes in it?
Which rice variety are we considering? Starches ratio? Cooking method?
Which is your race? Which are you allergies? Are you a manlet? Do you like semen?

You see, there's a lot of variables we shall consider

>>37341195
Objectively, potatoes
>tons of micros and fiber
>way more variety in cooking them so that you don't get bored, and no, putting a different brand sauce on your minute rice isn't a different recipe
>actually have their own taste
>better than rice or bread for cutting (less calories per volume of food
>better for bulking too if fried/oven baked with cheese and bakon/baked and drizzled with oil

>>37341195
Potatoes or lentils.
They're the better carb basic foods, with better micros (and macros, for the legumes).

If you're going strictly for rice or bread, I guess bread, because of the lower glicemic index, but it's still quite high.