Why did this not receive more publicity?
http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20150416/muscle-building-supplements-cancer
>webmd
Shut it down
>>36295283
meh
>>36295283
still worth it
>The interviews revealed that almost 20% of participants with testicular cancer had used muscle-building supplements. The higher odds of getting the disease remained after the researchers took other things into account.
Eh? How many people of the healthy group used creatine?
Of 356 men with testicular cancer, about 71 used creatine. Of the 513 men without testicular cancer, how many used creatine? Can't find the data anywhere.
>>36295913
>Of the 513 men without testicular cancer, how many used creatine?
less than 20%?
elsewhere I read that it increased cancer rates by 65%
We don't care about cancer, we're freaks!
>>36295913
wasn't creatine, it was "muscle-building-supplements" (not defined in the abstract)
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v112/n7/abs/bjc201526a.html
>>36296455
people without balls probably get prescription roids
>>36296773
homoScooby was right all along, supplements kill
people who go there, pls post this on reddit
I wanna see their reactions
Try L leucine
I'm on the mobile so I'm not gonna fuck around with getting a link look it up
>>36298582
What about L leucine?
>>36298893
It is aids muscle tissue synthesis there are plenty of studies about it maybe most of them aimed at the elderly to keep them from wasting but nevertheless it is known to stimulate muscle synthesis works well with Carnosine and citrulline malate 2 to 1 ratio because that helps illuminate the ammonia produced from the leucine metabolism also requiring biotin for Lucina so be sure taking either a B complex or a tablespoon of peanut butter
>>36295386
how long have you been taking it and what benefits are you seeing ?
>>36295283
Because it's fucking obvious you moron.
Who wants to live past the age of 70 anyway
>>36300840
you'll live alright after the surgery, but without your balls ...
Whey isn't considered a muscle building supplement I don't think. They're talking about creatine and some other steroid stuff that isn't labeled on the ingredients.
From the original article.
"MBS use is a potentially modifiable risk factor that may be associated with TGCC."
The study used a statistical analysis called odds ratio, with an odds ratio of 1.65 and a confidence interval of. 95
Basically the article concludes that given someone has testicular germ call cancer there may be an association with prior use of muscle building supplements. I wouldn't worry about it.
