>>35425953

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=423Ew_DQC40

>>35425953
>Canada
>earthquake
BC?

>>35425953
Why is the other nipple blurred?

>>35425953
congratulations, you are an idiot.

>>35426027
>>35425953
The nipplesnatcher strikes again, now not even sparing women!

>>35426045
Why? What should I of done?

>>35426210

>What should I of done?

im not even a native english speaker but man that sentence gives me brain damage

>>35425983 <-- related

>>35425953
>435x3x3
>going down for fourth rep

There's your problem OP

>>35426232
His sentence is correct, albeit slang.

>>35426566
No it isn't you fucking nigger. Just because you porch monkeys can't form a coherent sentence doesn't mean your babble is correct.

>>35426649
It's not even nigger slang, fool.

>>35426649
Look out guys, someone let the grammar prescriptivist out of his cage again!

>>35425953
>lying on the internet
The earthquake lasted literally a second, not nearly enough time to feel shaky then realize it's the ground, probably lying about the weight too.

>>35426722
Any fuckface using "should of" should be offed.

>>35426721
>>35426722
mup da doo didda po mo gub bidda be dat tum muhfugen bix nood cof bin dub ho muhfugga

>>35426566
There's nothing correct about improper usage. You are judged by how well you use the language. You can't just say, "I self-identify as correct and if you say otherwise, you're oppressing me." There are rules.

>>35426768
dis raht ear

>>35426566

No, slang is using the contracted "should've"

"Should of" is just retard speak

>>35426232
Isn't that a mistake only native speakers make, though?
I mean, they learn speaking before writing, so the kids mistake 've with of when they hear it but never see it written for years.