Is this pic real?
>>35199587
yep
>>35199587
Yes, but you don't just lose fat in 1 part of your body. It's a whole body process
>>35199587
whats that suppose to be
a pound of fat or what? And like the other anon said you cant control where you lose the fat its a whole body process.
You will lose fat tho its not really hard and time consuming to get into the 12%-15% range assuming you are not a big fat fucking slob
bf% estimate in the left two and right two pics?
>>35200358
>before and after
>literally no changes
>>35200378
You must be very bad at these.
The first front pic is in better lighting, closer and I have a pump. The second picture casts a shadow over my abs and it's not as clear.
The back has considerably more definition in the second picture, as do the abs, if you consider the lighting difference.
These are ten days apart mind you.
I don't care about the delta as much as I care for an estimate for my current body fat % on the right.
>>35200358
aren't you that weird dude from /fa/ and sufu?
>>35200467
I only post on /fit/
>>35200358
Probably 11-12% in both pics. You didn't lose much more than water weight in 10 days. That's why you look a little leaner.
>>35200456
>10 days apart
are you literally retarded? do you honestly expect people to notice a difference after a short period? I'm not >>35200378 but there are literally no changes
>>35200358
>tupac.jpg
>>35200358
>>35200456
The back pictures aren't even close to the same pose.
>>35200486
The change is small, maybe 1%. I'm fully aware of that. You can see rhomboids in the second pic but not the first.
Like I said though, I now just want a general estimate which only one guy has offered (thanks)
>>35200358
Literally autism the post. Fuck people like you.
>>35200537
>>35200519
This picture demonstrates a more clear difference.
>>35200537
Why are you so mad?
>>35200358
>144972005963.jpg
this isnt your photo is it
>ITT: people replying to a troll
>>35199587
Yeah.
Did you know 7.5 pounds of fat is about the same size as a gallon of milk?
>>35200523
>I now just want a general estimate
worthless.
in such a small timeframe, random fluctuations in water weight outweigh any fat loss or muscle gain.
>>35199587
Absolutely. That is what body fat looks like, and that is how much space a pound of it takes up.
However, losing 1lb =/= losing 1lb of body fat.
Even with the perfect macros and the perfect routine, its impossible to lose 100% body fat by composition.
>>35202714
Not on an 800 calorie deficit. And I'm not an advanced bodybuilder, I literally have no more muscle mass than the average 5'8" male of my age, so I'm still a beginner in bodybuilding terms.
Which means that I can gain muscle and lose fat at the same time, which is in accordance with my experience, because I have increased my lifts during this cut, even after lifting over a year.
>>35200358
You look like shit with almost no change. Nice
>>35199587
>>35204211
Thanks for telling the truth, really
>>35204221
Alright, I feel bad now. I'll be real, I'd say 10% on right, 11 on left.
Take your pictures with more time between them though.
>It came from outerspace
>my sides
>your one rep max
>>35204219
>muscle density is 1.06 g/ml
>fat density is (about) 0.9 g/ml
that pic is bullshit
>>35205542
Agreed.
1 kg of fat is basically 1 liter of fat, just like water.
They're very close in density.
If you have 5 kg to lose, that's still 5.5 liters of fat though, it still seems like a lot
>>35204219
>>35200358
>>35200358
I just love how you were a skinny little runt in the first pic and decided to cut. what r u doing m8
>>35207322
1. power to weight ratio
2. I can still gain muscle and strength on a cut
3. I can stay lean year round
>>35207420
>I'm anorexic
>>35207446
I am inspired by Frank Yang
I think that is the best way to say it
>>35207681
Well in that case you've got miles to grow skinnyboi. You already look 15 years older than him and are nowhere near his strenght or body. Pathetic.
>>35207702
Besides the fact that you get a dopamine rush every time I respond, why are you bothering to insult me and tell me to kill myself intermittently? Who are you? What do you look like?
>>35207781
>I hate you but still need your approval.
>>35200456
>These are ten days apart mind you
>ten days apart mind you
>ten days apart
>ten days
>ten
>e
>n
SAVAGE
A
V
A
G
E
>>35207846
I just realized that your existence is only a challenge
You're part of my consciousness, in all effectiveness- your influence is whatever I make of it
>>35207953
>I just realized
>just realized
>I'm that slow
>>35207880
SAVAGE
A G
V A
A V
G A
EGAVAS
>>35199587
no its photoshopped
>>35208009
>Them deed fish eyes.
Lol
>>35200456
I FOUND IT
I FOUND IT
>>35205542
>Bone density totally doesn't increase with exercise
>Let's just forget the extra mile of blood vessels added during cardio training
>>35208400
You still need to find another difference, autismo-san
>>35199587
real small maybe
>>35209122
Picture says spot 7 differences. I found 7 differences.
>>35200589
Still not the same pose. You're flaring on the right as much as you can and the arms are further out.
There are literally no changes. Come back when you've worked out for at least 6 months.
>>35209196
There's still one more to be found.
>>35209196
>Picture says spot 7 differences. I found 7 differences.
>>35204179
Being a noob has NOTHING to do with gaining muscle whole losing fat. We already know it can be done, you can gain 3 lbs lbm every 4 months on a deficit with enough protein.
The problem is, is that's really fucking slow and ineffective. Your body can put on about a kilo of lbm a month as a natty under IDEAL conditions (surplus required).
Aim for a gain of a kilo a month.
Tl;dr bulk/cut cycles are more effective than a recomp.
Learn what you're talking about before saying stupid broscience.
Also
>Over a year of lifting
>That
You fucked up anon
>>35209268
>>35209276
>mfw
Welp, time to kill myself
>>35209309
I know cut and bulk are more effective than recomp. I spent much of my first year and a half lifting in maintenance or cutting/bulking ineffectively
I am currently making the fastest body composition changes ever, in a sharp cut, and simultaneously increasing all of my lifts.
I have trained for a year and a half, and my strength has doubled while my bodyweight has stayed constant- my deadlift is 430 pounds at 137 pounds, bench is 205, squat 340. I am training for athletics.
I was 20+% bodyfat when I started lifting and my squat was 135, deadlift 185, bench 115.
>>35209264
I just took another back picture with the same pose as the first; the ratio is again much higher than in the first photo which was taken two weeks ago.
>>35209547
You really love me
Are you the guy who serviced my laptop?
>>35208009
do you live in socal?
>>35209547
I didn't know it was possible for human beings to be 137 lbs
>>35209685
roughly
>>35209709
logically there are only a few options now of which I will enumerate a couple
1. your definition of human is wrong
2. I am not a human (5'8 manlet)
>>35209742
I'm 5'8 (5'9 on internet) and I'm 170.
I don't understand how you can be such a twiggy little shit
>>35209276
>>35208400
>>35209196
I don't get it
Is it that the text describing the task is a difference between the two images?
>>35200358
nice gyno fag
>>35210129
No, I missed a tiny little hill off to the left of the pig's foot.
>>35200358
>intentionally showing off your pubes
kill yourself
>captcha:Johnson
>>35200456
>before and after pictures
>10 days apart
