Mode?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fit/ - Fitness
You are currently reading a thread in /fit/ - Fitness
What mode am I in? Should I bulk or continue to cut. Down to 195 from 215, initially planned on getting to 185-187
>inb4 shitty chest genetics
>>35173497
Manlet mode
>>35173541
6'1 195, forgot to put the height in the description
>probably still a manlet
>>35173497
Bulk. Abs are for summer.
>>35173578
>6'1
No reason to lie on 4chan. I'm 6'1 / 175 / similar bf and am half your size.
To be that large at 6'1, you'd have to be 220+. Gtfo
>>35173610
>half my size
I am 6'1, you're probably fat or have no legs. gtfo
>>35173497
whats your routine
>>35173610
>To be that large at 6'1, you'd have to be 220
Pic related is 6'1 220 you dumb fuck, and Zyzz didn't even have big legs
>>35173719
lol he wasnt 220
>>35173739
He wasn't 6'1 either
>>35173739
He stated he was 100kg in that pic
>>35173497
>>35173610
I think bone structure/ thickness might play a part.
Pic related.
I'm 220lbs at 6'2, but OP looks to be about the same size as me.
>>35173739
He got up to 100 kg before he died
>>35173754
You're right 187cm is closer to 6'2 but murricans gonna murrican
>>35173713
Lower/Upper split with smolov for squats and a standard 6 week bench improvement program. Hit arms the last upper lift of the week, generally just 2 high weight bicep and tricep exercises
>>35173778
Unquestionably correct about bone structure playing a factor. Everyone has always told me I don't look as heavy as I am
>>35173719
Literally you're proving yourself wrong by posting this. OP with less bodyfat (lets say 5lbs im being nice) to get as shredded as zyzz and then add the 25 to get him up to 220. That's 30 lbs of 100% lean mass you shit eating faggot the difference is enormous. Op is like 12-13% 195 at 6'1" it checks out
>>35173925
Nigga...I'm on OP's side. This fag (>>35173610) is some dyel claiming that OP is lying
>>35173925
thank you for legitimizing my claim, my height would be a ridiculous thing to lie about on here
>>35173778
Even if bone structure doesn't play a role 1)you're not as lean as OP and 2) an inch of height can account for about 5-6 lbs of mass, add to that the effect of bodybuilding and it's more like 7. Accounting for imperfections in height measurement or hydration status/water retention/time of day you each took your weights and it makes total sense. My weight can fluctuate as much at 6-10 lbs in a single day. It's not that unbelievable. Also OP looks stronger/better but you look bigger/wider in general, but not more muscular.
/thread
>>35173949
We all know only manlets lie about their height.
>>35173996
valid, still a ridiculous thing to lie about
Just looking at him without height (if hes lying who cares, doesn't affect whether he should bulk v cut) I reckon he should cut. Everyone should get lean real lean once in their life, just so you get the experience on diet and working out, so you bulk and cut better in future
>>35173978
>Also OP looks stronger/better but you look bigger/wider in general, but not more muscular.
>but you look bigger/wider in general
>you look bigger/wider
Thanks, that's all I needed to hear. :)
>>35173949
Post lifts for science?
>>35174055
Bench: 290
Front Squat: 315
Deadlift: 405 (dealt with back problems and never touch anything more than 405 for doubles)
OHP: 195
is this a cbt?
how much more fat do i have to cut to finally look good ;w;
>>35174091
goodie
I'm 5'11.5" and got u by like 5% on lifts so I think I'll look good once I lean out
too bad I'm still a manlet mfw
>>35174100
bout 10 lbs u be lookin real nice m8, u can do it in 6 weeks.
>>35174135
but I suck at cutting
do I carb cycle?
