Bump for knowledge.

>>34880875
> keeps getting criticism here on /fit/
and that criticism is never applied by person that usually posts this

>>34880875
HERE
WE
GO

>>34881582
also
>inb4 that trap defending this

I saw this today and gonna give it a try for like a month. Why do u care about criticisms on Taiwanese smoothie recipe board.

>>34881645
it starts softly...

>>34881645
>doing dl after all that shit
see you in injury thread in few weeks anon

>>34880875

>>34880875
you'll be fucked after a few weeks of that routine unless you're juicing, that's why

>all of those compounds every day
kek

>>34880875
1. Personally the legs day seems lol retarded.
>Maxing Lowbar& front squats; deadlifts& sumo's on the same day.
Why wouldn't you max front squat & sumo; Low bar and deadlift? Your lowbar and deadlift sets are going to fuck up your front squat and sumo sets respectively. It's pretty standard to max a squat and a pull in the same day. Maxing deadlifts then Sumo's immediately after seems like a great way of torching your lower back.

Also, The squatting volume seems really low. You don't need two weeks between max squat/deadlift sessions.

>>34881714
I totally disagree lol. He's only benching/pressing heavy once per week, and he's only squatting/pulling heavy biweekly. 3x5 isn't a lot of volume either.

>>34882697
Me again.

The layout in general seems really odd. Why not just cut the compound volume out of a powerlifting routine, and add in more assistance volume/intensity? Pic related would be my first guess at what to do, but I don't really know how to pick the bodybuilding assistance exercises.

>>34882899