Fashion really is cyclical. British undercover police officer buying crack from a local dealer, 1995.
>red pants
NEVER EVER
>>9784069
why not?
Ur moms rly cyclical on my dick
>>9784075
Because you look like a posh cunt.
>>9784316
pleb detected
>>9784308
HAHAHA got em
>>9784075
Look like a Hurray Henry on is way to a beef and mustard party.
Actually, they only look shit because they go "Dear, I'm pushing the boat out today and wearing my red trousers!"
"Will you be reassessing your image?"
"Oh, god, no! I just thought I'd wear my red trousers with whatever shit check shirt and elbow-padded jacket I normally wear to lynchings. Now, where are my black shoes?"
>>9784062
the topknot was originally a thing done by hardcore fans in germany, except it was more at the back of the head like in this photo
also hardcore fans did the whole bomber jacket thing too
>>9784436
Interesting.
Why haven't fedoras come back in style?
>>9784062
I actually remember Baresi.
What's up Nathan.
Who's the dealer and who's the cop?
>>9784950
They have. They're not ubiquitous, but they're definitely more prevalent in fashion-forward wardrobes than they were two or three years ago.
>>9785232
I think the black guy is the cop.
>>9784950
Don't you mean why DID they? Because fuck they are some shitty hats.
>>9785232
hmmm, whos face would they blur out? the undercover cop whos identity is supposed to be protected and kept secret? or the criminal whos face can be posted on every wanted poster and news?
White chap is the undercover narc, there's a VICE article on it, it's an interview.
>>9785301
ya wrong btw
>>9784436
I can support his statement. The topknot was in vogue in the hardcore movement.
Ruffneck and all that.
I still feel a bit disappointed to see some of these elements coming back being worn by androgynous facebook childs, but that's the reality of things. They could at least get a buzzcut, fuck.
You guys are fucking dumb.
>implying the white guy is the criminal
>imolying the black guy is the cop
Ding dong nignog
>>9785867
your from the US you don't understand ;)
>>9785871
>your
based britbong education.
>people think he isn't the narc
>>9785882
don't make me get my educational psychologist report out
>>9785871
No, I'm not.
>>9785920
then it'd be obvious the narc is the black guy
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/inside-the-world-of-a-british-undercover-drugs-cop-729
It's only cyclical because when people want to push it forward it's usually deemed "outsider" or "too weird/avant garde"
>>9784062
>AT ANY TIME
What at any time, you crazy sign? WHAT?
>>9786459
IDK MAN IM BUGGIN
>>9786459
can u not see that symbol above the "at any time"
it means u cant park there
go see an eye doctor
nah better have someone take you there because you might not find your way
>>9784062
That's what I said to my brother a few months ago.
Fashion is a cycle. With a few minor changes in acceptable clothe size or fit.
>>9784062
>hurr durr fashun is a cylce
no it's fucking not
show me a nigger dressed in pic related
show me someone draped in fucking furs
you fucking cant
fashion is not a fucking cycle, people fall back on shit of the past but it is not fucking cyclical
