Techwear General
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
Let's get one of these going.
Is milsurp worth it?
There are so many cheap pieces out there with decent specs but I feel like I'll just end up looking like some hipster kid.
Are Reebok Insta Pump techwear and are they worth buying ?
>>9689911
Wtc
>>9689904
Depends what it is.
Most military equipment is pretty cheaply made, expected to be replaced when it breaks rather than last. It tends to fade in washes.
>>9689911
wtc
>>9689930
I was thinking about just getting a cadpat shirt to wear during spring and summer.
It's been getting pretty hot so I gotta drop the layers. I've been spending the past month or so wearing joggers and all black qasas / free runs with a basic shirt. I just wanted something to layer on top when it gets colder at night.
I was thinking about a CADPAT or tiger stripe shirt. I could add some cool nametag or patches to it. Plus a lot of these are ripstop which is nice.
Summer inspo anyone?
>>9690059
Is there anything similar to this for men? Just curious.
>>9690698
Lots of designers make convertible clothing or things that have removable sleeves, hems, etc. But things that straight up go from one look, silhouette, fabric to another entirely different one? No. Some Junya reversible stuff comes close, but that's why Chalayan is Chalayan.
>>9689878
enjoy your wet ankles from rain splashing on the ground faggot
>>9689904
god this looks bad. like a chick's aerobics oufit or something. u gotta be super careful with leggings so they don't look affected and qasas look really bad from many angles unfortunately
>>9691124
The thing with qasas is that you can only pretty much wear them either under your pants or with joggers. Qasas do NOT work with tight bottoms.
I have the "triple" black ones and I can only pull them off with joggers because of their sillouette. They look big as fuck irl. I think it's because of their sole or something but they stick out like a motherfucker unless your bottom has a bit of a loose fit. This does not show in qasa pics though. They are pretty much made for this style though.
>>9691202
yea I know what you mean about the bulkiness only complimenting certain pants silhouettes. I have a few sneakers like that
>>9689878
I'm sure everyones seen this by now right?
>>9689911
why would you taunt everyone with images of nice clothing and then not tell where to cop? :(
>>9691202
fuck that fits so good
>>9692095
>definition of techwear thread
>>9689911
w2c
>>9692309
thank you
>>9689993
CADPAT is cool, but do you live in Canada? If yes, dnc.
what's the point of techwear if you don't have cool future tech inside the clothes?
It's like tribes in Africa putting white clay on their faces to appear whiter.
It looks better, sure, but underneath it's useless and inferior and everyone knows it.
You are essentially cosplaying.
>>9692968
what? do you know what techwear is?
>>9689993
Should work
Any kind of clothes can look cyberpunk by ironing the shit out of them
>>9693107
I've been thinking about coping some joggers for a while now and going techninja. Where can I get some / which should I get? Modestly priced though, so no acr stuff (sadly).
>>9693603
>tfw no sick cyborg eyes
norwegian rain
>>9690663
I want to try out shorts & leggings for the summer, not sure what shorts would work though.
Any suggestions?
The only shorts that come to mind are adidas, and they're not really techwear and have a bit too much branding.
>>9694539
Tacky Veilance.
>>9690059
w2c pants ?
Pants general
>>9693709
>tfw no invisibility parka-cardigan
>>9694603
I have both Nike and Under Armor, they're both good, the UA is cheaper.
any pics of these in everyday settings?
i'm skeptical. is it night wear only?
So I just saw these today and they look pretty good for Goretex shoes, which usually look overdesigned and tacky. When I get my paycheck I'm probably gonna go try on a pair. I'll probably only use on rainy nights or for hiking or something. Thoughts? They do look a little bulky.
>>9696664
they look like goretex hiking boots, which is what they are
they look more appropriate for hiking outdoors than in casual or urban settings (imo)
>>9691202
W2c pants?
>>9689878
>Let me stare into a corner for a while to get a sick fit pic
>>9700870
jesus christ
Is this guy wearing shin pads? Am I seeing this right?
Can you guys help me make a list of techwear brands? I've got (In no particular order):
Arc'teryx Veilance
Outlier
Mission Workshop
Acronym
Gyakusou
Isaora
Maharishi
please help
>>9700928
Yes he is. I had this full set of photos at one point.
>>9700870
>>smh
>>9700928
lol yes
>>9700978
Proof NY and Outerboro for dedicated tech brands.
Then things like Patagonia, Mountain Hardwear, Nike, Northface, Under armour for a few assorted tech pieces maybe.
>>9700978
http://dressed-down.com/blog/2013/5/15/intro-to-techwear-pt-3-brand-list
>>9700928
is there a way to wear techwear and still look feminine if female?
im thinking pleated gray/black skirts with tech jackets/parkas but are there anymore options
i really like techwear it just seems much more harder to get into it if youre female (which i am)
>tfw lost my NTS-NG1
It's just fucking gone....I have no clue where it is and it's been discontinued for so long
I need a new neck gaiter....what should I get?
Pic is what I had. My DS-HD2 feels naked without it.
>>9689993
Oh ho! Good luck my friend!
>>9701522
>5 visible brand logos in one outfit
>having even a single visible logo
