model requirements
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
since the old one got deleted because some trips spammed it with pointles shit i'll have to start a new one:
what do you consider requirements ( and adventages) to be(come) a model?
>>9554095
how can what is posted be pointless, when the whole thread is pointless
you either ARE or you AREN'T
no amount of rationalisation and nitpicking will change that
this thread needs no further discussion, everything that needs to be said could be said in one post anyway
furthermore l2google
>>9554105
this
delete thred u pleb
either you're a model or you arent
>>9554105
>>9554106
angry trips reporting in
at least for male models:
tall (6' minimum)
thin
striking facial features - not necessarily handsome
ps you can google this shit, you newfags need to stop fucking posting
>>9554151
what's striking?
>>9555079
look up Sang Woo Kim
hnnng
>>9555083
So basically have a symmetrical face with clean features?
>>9555083
didn't know being perfet entailed being half spic, have your thighs rubbing together and being overed in moles that show even with cake face
and a desperate need to fit in so you learn about mens street wear because boys your age like it
people that an stand ree:
bring back pigfuck and trunks plz
>>9555085
yeah that guy has a seriously sharp face
looks like runescape
>>9555093
<--
>>9555099
sounds like you lol
#projecting
>>9555115
can't you just re-enroll in community college and GTFO?
>>9555125
I never enrolled in college, nor have I ever considered it...
>>9555129
it shows
>>9555140
thank you! :)
>>9555099
>trunks
trunks was always a retard's poet
