>>9475626
yes

Too good for the price definitely. They're incredibly good at keeping their production costs at a minimum.

http://www.ecouterre.com/uniqlo-under-fire-for-promoting-sweatshop-conditions-in-china/

Only if you get it in a sale
Belts are shit
Jeans are never in my size(28/29 waist 32 leg)
For the price some of the shirts are ok but I'd rather spend a little more and go Esprit
There knitwear is shit

>>9475665
Pretty much this.

Copped their shit in bangkok new years sale and I don't regret it. But wouldn't pay full price for other than basics.

nah, it just gets rep cause its japanese and largely minimalistic.
same quality as any other fast fashion brand.

>>9475626
Copped stuff for 700 yen/about sub $7 for tees while in tokyo, so yeah theyre good. At those prices how are you surprised its sweatshop material?

their zip hoodies are surprisingly thick and good for the price

and I use their basic shirts for undershirts or just lying around

I wouldn't buy much more than that, but yeah not bad for the price

>>9475665
The jeans you have to get hemmed in stores which is why they're all 32 or 34 leg.

They're okay outside of that.

awesome fitting jeans for me. it all depends on you when deciding to buy from places..

>>9475626
it's the h&m of japan
fast fashion made in china shit that will fall apart in a year

>>9475626

Short answer: yes.

More nuanced answer: Overall yes, but the degree varies. The woven shirts are just OK. But their cashmere sweaters, for instance, defy all conventional wisdom about cheap cashmere and are hella nice for like $80.

>>9477914
>parroting dumb shit about clothes you've never seen IRL
embarrassing.

>>9477914
Jokes on you, their stuff has held up better than everything else I own,

The one bad thing is that their items shrink in a large range show you might be buying shit that shrinks too much or too little.

>no Uniqlo in Chicago
Fucking bullshit man.