am I the only one who thinks bombers look better oversized?
I don't mean massive, just one size bigger than it should be.
I feel like military inspired outerwear should maintain their functionality and fit, or else the wearer doesn't latch on to the military look, they just look like artsy fartsy emulators.
<case in point
do you actually own a slim fit bomber?
can you show me one that looks good?
>>9468434
I agree with you. I really like the puffy sleeve look.
Pic related is not as puffy as the original bombers but I think it's got the perfect amount of puffiness.
I wouldn't even call that a bomber. All it really has in common with an MA-1 is the collar. At that point, it's just a jacket.
>>9468434
I agree completely.
My friend does have pic related from uniqlo though, and he wears it over a t shirt, the same way you'd wear a sweatshirt, and it looks great.
>>9468476
okay good to have a little validation.
I want a cotton bomber, this one in particular, but because it's made 'slim' and has no structure to it, it looks like a zip up slim fitting sweater to me, doesn't look 'like a bomber'
think sizing up will help or is the issue the material going to persist
and make me look like
I'm wearing
a poorly fitting bomber inspired zipup sweater
>>9468434
>am I the only one who thinks bombers look better oversized
no.
>>9468492
seems kinda nice, hows the quality though (are there good alternatives to uniqlo)?
>>9468560
he's only had it for a few weeks but he wears it often enough that i'd say the quality is pretty good.
>>9468476
where2cop
>>9468434
They look like shit if they're too tight. Length wise I wouldn't want them too long though or else you're tip toeing on hoodrat territory
