cop or not
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
cop or not copornot coppernot copperknot coppernaut
>>9165381
just saw on cos. what's to be said about cos quality? probably wont be brilliant but im sure it's better than it's father h&m
>>9165491
Just cop it already
>>9165491
>muh speckles
DO I
>>9165535
Looks good
don't cop if it's too expensive though
http://www.acnestudios.com/charles-black.html
cop or not?
>>9165535
Thanks, £175 which I'm happy to pay as it's heavily discounted. Not sure if the dollar signs seemed way too tacky though.
>>9165564
feeling acne clothes in person they've actually got some pretty alright quality, not sure why recently people here are claiming it's shit. But is it worth £800? Don't think so m8. That's a nice coat but you should look around before you drop nearly 1k on a coat from a mid-range brand
>>9165514
you just ordered an our legacy shirt from the us right? have you ordered from there before? how much were you fucked by customs into britain, little grey riding hood?
![image1xl[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Z8df2et.jpg "image1xl[1].jpg")
>>9165491
>>9165535
both alright
the cardigan
>>9165655
dnc
looks thin in a bad way, almost sheer. what do you plan on pairing it with?
>>9165583
tried it in person, cashmere wool pretty nice and fits decent too, but yeah its a lot.
what would you recommend instead?
Will be pairing with these
http://image1.superdry.com/static/images/products/upload4518467452077918977.jpg
>>9165767
nah
cough ornoth
>>9165789
are you going to be a clown? horrible yellow
>>9165794
i'm planning on getting dark brown laces though.
think the sole is too exaggerated? looks a bit gay
>>9165808
too red for brown. go black if you do
>>9165789
like the colour but they look a bit wrecked
This or black?
>>9165959
that
>>9165959
Ew. Picksomething else. This looks like shit and has obnoxious branding
>>9165994
im planning on removing the tag somehow.
>>9166002
in that case you might as well gat a rains anorak or something
I tried these on in the store and thought it looked great (my legs are way more aesthetic in the pants than the model).
Only problem is that I'm white and they're fake leather. I have plenty of outfits to go with them, I'm just wondering if it looks too shit to rock.
>>9166022
Don't really like the rubbery plastic look on those.
![_9792706[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gMQE9NU.jpg "_9792706[1].jpg")
Is it worth $100?
>>9166230
looks like it has too many pockets for my taste
![64I03JNAV_large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/x8nKl2K.jpg "64I03JNAV_large[1].jpg")
>>9166232
Here's how it looks when buttoned (navy, but same parka).
>>9166245
Still not feeling the pockets or buttons, but that's just nitpicking.
I'm also jewish as fuck, so I wouldn't spend $100 on it, but if its cool to you then I'd go for it
>>9166230
looks alright
>>9166092
da fuqq is that?
>>9166105
aesthetic is not an adjective, idiot.
>>9166288
aes·thet·ic
esˈTHedik/
adjective
1. concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty.
"the pictures give great aesthetic pleasure"
>>9166299
under no circumstances
>>9166304
w-why
>>9166311
Yeah I realize that, but it is an adjective.
>>9166316
this would be the only adidas item i own
>>9166346
looks good
id say cop
>>9165381
>>9166423
cop dat
fur is removable
it will probably be ~£200
>>9166777
nice trips
>>9166780
lmfao is that reagan on the arm
>>9166781
yee
yes or no
>>9166821
god no
>>9166822
So what you really mean is yes, yes?
>>9166824
yes means no
>>9166832
So a double negative, it's a yes.
>>9166837
yes, yes.
:^)
>>9166230
w2c?
>>9165535
w2c?
cop or not? theyre in dece condition for 09 dunks
>>9166969
depends on price
crop kernauh
>>9166983
its reasonable :/
nothing ridiculous
>>9167004
fuck no
>>9166989
toms are pretty lame
I finally saved 400, do I go for it?
>>9167009
Wait until Christmas sales. Don't pay full price for CPs
>>9167004
If you can find that with a gum sole and white laces that would be dope
>>9166994
if it's a reasonable price, I'd say they look good, the zippers look intact and the soles don't look blown out. I'd say cop, geos can be a great addition to an appropriate wardrobe.
y/n ? can get it for $180
>>9166844
topman :))
http://us.topman.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=&catalogId=33059&storeId=13051&productId=16368410&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&searchTerm=64I02JKHA&resultCount=1&geoip=home
