So what's next?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
So what's next?
>>8950547
Nothing.
>>8950547
Ayyy, that infographic only represents a small scope
maybe just think about it:
example - look at the 2010 pair, does everyone dress like that now?
ridciulous! of course not
if this is the case, what would make you think that the rest of those are a good example of their respective timelines?
can you give me a break!
also we were only around since the late 1700s so this picture doesnt make sense?
is
the
only
country
that matters
>>8950547
1660 was ballin
>>8950547
>Western
>1090
>explored in 1492
Wat
>2148, not wearing armor 24/7
>>8950603
So /fa/ it is time to get some fashionable suits of armor.
>>8950593
Europe was considered western before the discovery of the Americas.
>>8950640
Europe still is considered Western. The East and West are only vaguely geographic.
>>8950593
jesus christ you are retarded
WOW
>>8950617
if u wanna b nxtlvl
>>8950673
got any ideas? I'm thinking a revival of classical Greco-Roman stuff
the woman is so tiny lol
>>8950680
>not wearing a greek cloak
>>8950569
>this
1810s is nice
>>8950668
>taking the bait
This shit is pretty fucking incorrect.
>>8950547
ughhh the 1970s when women dressed like drag queens
>>8950547
only good ones are
1400s
1500s
1760s
1780s
1810s
1900s
1940s
2010s palewave only
Why is 1090 dressed like a knight templar? That's woefully inaccurate. The Order of the Temple was formed only 30 years later.
>>8950547
Can't wait for 1600s fashion to come back in style so I can get my Captain Hook sweg on
>>8950569
>Post-apocalyptic fashion
Great! Can't way to show off my fits to all the people that won't survive!
>>8953282
lol
>>8950547
ah, i had no idea the average man in the 11th century was a soldier
everything prior to the late 19th century should be rags
>>8950547
Fremencore when?
w2c?
>>8950719
i could actually see this working
it looks comfy as fuck and having a blanket at the ready would be greatness
>>8954238
I would imagine people would have loads of different broaches as well.
>>8950719
Not wearing the superior roman toga
>>8954383
>thinking romans wore togas all the time and not just for
"formal" reasons
>togas are the suits of the ancient world
>being this pleb
>>8950719
what would you wear underneath?
>Not knowing that "The West" is more or less every country with Aristotelian/Classical Greek heritage
Americans
>>8954649
>wearing things underneath your clamys
>being this pleb
>>8950547
Whatever the aristocrats are wearing right now.
Just look at what the kings of UK, spain, denmark, etc are wearing.
>>8954679
Wouldn't they just wear formal or smart casual in order to keep up appearances and look distinguished?
>>8954669
That would probably get me arrested.
Do you guys really not realize it's going to be a sick fit onesie? You can project your personality into it by having it be either grim dark navy / olive or have it be bright yellow/pink with circles and shit. Personally I'll be rocking vaporwave Asthetics such as this (pic) on a white onesie. Paired with a yellow fannybag and a teal scouter (Google glass will become DBZ scouters) I will look fucking bangin
>>8950547
WE LUNARCORE NOW
>>8954882
not until we send people to live on mars and the moon
>>8954885
>not being a moon-man right now
>>8954885
>)
This
Until the chinese fags send humans for the first time ever in the history of the mankind to the moon we can talk
>not wearing pre-human clothing
Protip:
Get naked.
>>8950547
>that shit resolution
>>8950719
This fit looks amazing
>>8954990
meant to post picture
>>8954226
I wish this was socially acceptable.
Far-right is goat/10.
>>8955036
I clicked it but I didn't double click the picture in the folder. I fucked up
>>8954998
are those his bare buttcheeks
>>8955070
well he's not going to wear something underneath his chlamys. You could wear a chiton if you wanted
>>8950569
jej
Cyber renaissance
>>8955159
ehhh it reminds me of steampunk
>>8950603
>mass effect 4
it's going to be a steaming pile of shit anon
>>8954998
w2c felt hat?
>>8954383
Togas are actually complained about by Roman politicians. They were clumsy and uncomfortable, because one arm had to be up all the time to hold it together. They were only worn for formal reasons.
>>8955159
>2040
>go outside
>all the women are wearing yoga pants under their microskirts like the one in the middle
I foresee a big increase in assaults and rapes.
im kinda fucking delusional but I believe I'll be alive when I can transport my mind into a suit of armor and have tissue on the outside to look however i want.
>>8955349
Women are already wearing leggings as fucking pants. I predict transparent leggings. Because it's the only way they can be sluttier now.
>>8955377
Mark this post. It's the future.
>>8953282
>2014
>not getting your Captain Hook sweg on
It's like you aren't even trying.
>>8955377
Screencapd.
Dubs confirm it.
15th century was the real deal. Check those damn aesthetics.
The OP-image is 100% incorrect though.
>>8955159
Neo-Renaissance when?
>>8953413
>tfw Butlerian Jihad
>can't post on /fa/ because thinking machines
>just sitting here in my decrepit mudbrick house - no one will see my sick Museum-Fremen fits but the God Emperor
>see qt Fish Speaker
>pls be on Arrakis
>>8950547
>1090s
>knight armour
Pic related, modern fashion according to OP's pic.
>>8955099
That's because the last one is normal people whereas the others are rich people.
Most of them should be tunics and shitty cloth clothes.
>>8950547
it doesn't add up
: FTFY edition
