What's this style called?
I'm thinking it's basically a conservative normcore style.
Can anyone post more examples of this style? I want to look conventionally good without trendy /fa/ bullshit like cuffed pants
>>11462807
That's called gap core
go to the gap
Normie here, it looks good
Girls will think it looks good, so will other people in the streets
The extremley skinny people wearing cloaks and eyepatches of /fa/ will probably say you look shit but they don't go anywhere that isn't work/class/home anyway so you should be fine
Only thing I'm not a fan of is the vans
its not normcore its just normie
Is his torso really that long?
>>11462840
it is not attractive at all. First of all, colors are too light, boring and don't match. I don't get why anyone would choose so mainstream looking colors. Secondly, shorts are generally really ugly because they are too big and look homeless. Not stylish oversized like on runways but really cheap. I personally wouldn't notice this guy, let alone want to date him, but it is still better than hiphop style, just very random and cheap-looking. Men's fashion is ugly in general, it is like men look ugly on purpose because it is "gay" to look like a fashion model, wear leggings or anything unique at all
>>11462881
> shorts too big
???
>>11462897
men's shorts are too big in general. Compare them with women's shorts. It is like "I am lazy man, I don't care about looking attractive, bitches have to look good and not me".
Only some gay men wear hotpants, pants without buttocks, tights or leggings.
>>11462881
Did you not read the part where he said the people of /fa/ will obviously think it looks like shit.
95% of people will think its looks good, probably even better than the average guy. Yeah it's boring but if you're not really interested in fashion then there's nothing wrong with dressing like that at all.
>>11462895
I'm not surprised by this stock image person being disappointed, their style is similar
>>11462910
I find it arrogant that men wear so ugly things while expect women to be pretty. 95% women are much, much more attractive, wear better clothing, use makeup and take care of themselves. It is not wrong to wear this or anythign and it is not the worst example, but many wouldn't really start conversation or date a guy like that.
The point is also that guys would never notice a girl wearing those standard random walmart things and would totally ignore her
>>11462933
lmao, move somewhere warm
everyone lifts and the men look better than the women more often than not
>>11462939
I have never seen a man prettier than a woman. Maybe some androgynous model on tumblr, but not really
>>11462933
Yeah no shit, I no one is arguing that women as a whole don't put more time into the way they look. However,
>but many wouldn't really start conversation or date a guy like that.
This is objectively incorrect. Unless you're living in some bohemian urban center that is considered perfectly fine attire for a guy. In fact, most normie girls would probably prefer it to the kind of stuff people wear hear.
>The point is also that guys would never notice a girl wearing those standard random walmart things and would totally ignore her
This is also dumb. Have you ever been on an american college campus? 70% of the girls are wearing whatever the equivalent of this is like yoga pants and some kind of a sweater or hoodie, during the winter or short shorts and an over sized shirt during summer. But this is irrelevant anyways because this wasn't what that guy was arguing in the first place.
>>11462961
*here
>>11462955
Most women look like shit. Most guys look better than women in warmer areas where skin is shown. See LA, See Roo island. You just have bad taste.
>>11462961
yoga pants are not equivalent of baggy shorts. If a woman wears loose fitting baggy shorts, sandals and exactly the same shirt, nobody would ever talk to her.
I would love to see men wearing yoga pants or hotpants
>>11462970
This - what the fuck do you mean you've never seen a man that's better looking than a woman?
Never seen a man you're more sexually attracted to but that doesn't = attractiveness overall
>>11462970
so they have had plastic surgery? The faces of males are more bumpy, rough, not that fine-tuned, sisters look much prettier than their brothers (unless they are deformed)
>>11462980
I've seen men that I'm attracted to but they are not "prettier" than women, not even close. sexual attraction is not the same like thinkig that someone is pretty. I mean, women might think that Kim Kardashian is prettier than Kanye West but sexually prefer Kanye
>>11462979
holy fuck you're retarded. I'm saying in terms of social equivalence, obviously baggy shorts (though the ones in OP's pic arent even baggy) aren't gonna literally look the same as yoga pants.
And believe me, a man in yoga pants is gonna get much more than less attention than a women in baggy shorts. At least the woman won't get constantly called a faggot.
>11462881
This is practical attire. It looks fine, not reinventing the wheel by any means but looks better than 90 percent of what men normally wear. How does it feel being a pretentious virgin?
>>11462955
please get the fuck off of 4chan this website is not for you
>>11462998
in social terms? It is so typical that men compare women and men differently.
And stylish men are of course faggots because men can look like people of walmart because they are not women or faggots. It is extremely arrogant to compare men shorts with yoga pants because women of course have to wear tight clothing that fits but for men anything is fine until it looks ugly, Men in yoga pants are considered faggots only because it is expected that if man takes care of himself he must be gay
>>11463026
this is such a fucking stupid way to think.
tighter does not always equal more fashionable. There are plenty of styles (female styles included) that use baggier silhouettes but can still look good. Yeah and no shit fashion is going to be judged differently for men and women. They're anatomically different. Men don't wear yoga pants because they have a dick and that'd look ridiculous and would probably be pretty uncomfortable.
Society and culture decides what is and isn't fashionable, not you. Plenty of people, women included, would consider what OP's pic is of to be just as if not more fashionable than the numerous basic bitches in yoga pants and a hoodie. It's not like there's any more effort that goes into wearing yoga pants than shorts or anything. Seriously what the fuck are you even on about.
>>11463042
i understand if it is really fashion and suits for men or women. But normal men think that they don't have to show their body and expect women to do so and this is hypocritical. Maybe women want to see men's dicks but of course men never think about this. Only women have to show skin, men wear random walmart pants. All the girls wearing the same thing are called ugly lesbians and no man would talk to them.
I support men wearing more leggings, tights and makeup because right now they look ugly and boring like mormon women who never wear makeup and dress baggy (not fashionable baggy, bbut walmart style)
>>11462992
Beauty and pretty aren't the same thing. Men can easily be more beautiful than women. Their criteria is simply different.
Masculine beauty in about strength, power, agility. Soft isn't more beautiful because it isn't as striking, it isn't as moving. Why do you think models don't have soft faces and soft angles instead of harder ones?
>>11463074
Are you fucking retarded? Men walk shirtless all the fucking time with short swim trunks.
>>11463075
if criteria is different you don't really compare men to women and it is unfair. To compare fairly, you need to think how good would they look as opposite gender
>>11462933
>I find it arrogant that men wear so ugly things while expect women to be pretty.
Go back to tumblr
>>11463080
only on beach and even then most men have baggy shorts not thongs. The point is that they don't wear clothes that show off their body. Only gays do that because other men have standards
>>11463084
That's stupid. If you don't know that the criteria is fucking obviously different then you're braindead. You judge them both based on their own criteria. The fact is that on college campuses the men currently put more effort into their bodies and their outfits than the women on average. Everybody lifts weights, nobody shops at walmart. But the chicks think they can get away with a ponytail and PINK garbage. And you know what, they can. Because pussy has a higher market value than dick so there is no reason for them to try.
>>11463094
Don't you know that women only wear leggings and heels and thongs and make up because they're comfortable and they feel good in them?
girls don't dress for guys shitlord
guys dress and exercise just for girls if though it's pathetic
>>11463136
t. virgin
>>11463147
uuuuummmmmm my hymen broke itself at 12...
so shut up because you don't know me
ok thanks bye
xD
>>11463105
>>11463105
why should i judge someone based on their own criteria? Someone's criteria is to look like a fat ball, so they are pretty?
It is logically not fair to say that men for instance are prettier and then compare men with other men. It is exaclty like I would say that giraffes are prettier than elephants because this giraffe has long neck and it is pretty compared to other giraffes and that's why they are prettier than elephants:
Men should also wear more pink and ponytail is the best for certain face types both for men and women.
I don't care about pussies and dicks, I care about filling the streets with pretty men ;) it is not my concern if they are straight at all
>>11463172
>he doesn't want a hunk
Incredibly bad taste muchacha
>>11463178
good taste is then men looking like people of walmart? No tight and short pants showing off their perfect buttocks, no crop tops or extremely low v-nekcs showing their beautiful chest? No ripped tights showing their legs, no makeup showing their sexy eyelashes?
Just boring, average, slow creature wo shops at walmart
>>11463189
>their perfect buttocks,
I have a bubble butt tho, it's the main reason I never ever tuck my shirt in
>>11463219
Tucking in your shirt would emphasize your butt.
>>11463189
You are either a troll or have shit taste, how do you equate not wearing eye makeup to shopping at Walmart?
>>11463298
no, these ugly pants. They look like someone bought random clothes in bulk and typical male clothes look like that, they don't fit, they don't make their bodies sexier, they don't show their ass(ets)
>>11463298
>Tucking in your shirt would emphasize your butt.
No shit, that's why I said I DONT tuck
this is sexier
or this
>>11463342
Hope that's a girl cuz I just fapped to it
>>11463350
pantalone-core
>>11463189
this faggot
>>11463342
>>11463350
hahaha oh my god my sides this has got to be b8 is he seriously trying to bring back Renaissance era fashion
>>11462955
I think you might be a lesbian.
>>11463189
What a giant faggot - go back to tumblr
>>11462807
nono you r worng u have to lok like this i swear is fashionble just try be less strong mor skinny :D
