Advices on watch
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
Hello /fa/
I'm looking for advice on buying a watch.
I apologize if there is a general watch thread that I missed.
I currently own a submariner "homage"... picture related, it's mine.
I didn't know anything about watches back when I bought it 3-4 years ago and I thought the design was awesome.
I still love the design, but the watch is running slow (about 4-5 minutes off per week) and I now know it's basically just an imitation, so it feels weird to wear it. Plus, people came to me asking advice on Rolex because of it and it was pretty fucking embarrassing.
That's why I'm seriously considering buying a real watch.
Of course I like the black submariner design, if I could have it with a navy bezel, that would be awesome but the current blue model from Rolex looks a bit too light to me and it only comes with gold bracelet which makes it a bit off my budget as well (which would be around 5k$).
Also, if I buy a Rolex for example, can I be safe and don't worry about it running off every 3 years or so?
What would be your recommendation?
Thanks
>>11364402
Audemars or don't even bother.
>>11364402
>Also, if I buy a Rolex for example, can I be safe and don't worry about it running off every 3 years or so?
If you buy a Rolex it will keep for your entire life and then some.
I currently wear a 116034 that I have had for about three years. It has not failed me once.
It's also a classic watch in a classic size (36mm). It will never go out of style.
You talk about a "blue model," but if you bought a used Submariner or something and put a new bezel in it, that could happen I guess, but be aware - the purists may look down on you for it.
There is no other watch as robust and reliable and with such durability as a Rolex.
>>11364414
If you buy an Audemars like this guy suggests, be aware that an AP is more delicate and also costs more across the board (watches cost more, and servicing is much more expensive as well). However, the quality of the moment and finishing is second to none. They are another level above Rolex and roam with the likes of Patek and Vacheron.
If you were to get a starter AP, I would recommend the 15450, 15202, or 15400 if you like a larger watch (some people do not like this because they think it is not true to the original design because it uses the 3120 movement which some think is too small for the case).
If you want a larger AP with more wrist presence, I recommend a royal oak offshore or royal oak offshore diver. They're great but also larger and I don't know if thats your thing.
>>11364414
old pic
>>11364402
>5k for a fucking watch
I don't get it?
>>11364446
I have to ask: is it real? If so, how did you come by it?
>>11364471
>I don't get it?
What's "it"? Pussy?
>>11364471
Why drive a Bugatti when a Ford does the same job?
Its the same thing. Different quality standards and stuff like that. A Rolex will last decades. It will not fail you. They are (somewhat) handmade, and crafted to a high standard.
There is some branding involved, but some of the proceeds from Rolex sales go to charity I believe.
>>11364446
too much for that wrist
Which one guys?
The whole point is to impress normies. Normal people don't really know AP, but I have some cash to burn, so...
>>11366860
Audemars has actually made it into the hip hop and basketball scenes prominently enough that more people than you think might recognize it. I think the Royal Oak is objectively a more handsome watch than the Oyster Perpetual.
>>11366860
>The whole point is to impress normies.
I don't like your goal and I think its pretentious but in your case I would get the Rolex because more people know about it. An AP is a connoisseurs watch
>>11366892
People into that scene would be more inclined to recognize an Royal Oak Offshore, but most likely not the more understated Royal Oak.
>>11366903
>>11366860
Also pretty much nobody cares what kind of watch you wear if you want the truth. Buy it for yourself.
t. Rolex owner
>>11364402
Pro tip. If you want a submariner homage, go for Steinhart. If you want to sepnd some more, definitely go for Davosa Ternos. Since I got more into watches, I refused to even spend less than 300 euros on a watch, and even then I really focus on upper level watches.
>>11364402
If you're buying your first expensive watch I'll give the same suggestion I'll always give: Rolex datejust steel and yellow. It's versatile, iconic, and beautifully made. You can wear it in formal or casual wear and get away with it, and it's just plain nice to look at.
I think it's a great place to start, probably because it was the first costly watch in my collection.
I have had mine for a long time (pictured here on the left) and still find myself wearing it often.
>forgot pic first time
>>11366981
If you're in to dive watches I suggest checking out Omega and Doxa. They are probably my favorite brand for those. Here are a couple more of mine that I'm partial too, just for ideas. As a collector I get hard for all the different Doxas since they are usually released in numbered batches.
>>11366987
Another similar option to what you have in the OP that is within you price range would be an Omega Seamaster. Here's mine.
>>11366981
where have you been whenever there is a watches general?
for fun, select favorite
>>11367034
Definitely the Egona, 4 from the left and next to the Seiko. It's gorgeous.
Pic is the watch thats currently getting some love. Have I mentioned I love Doxa and dive watches?
yo watch heads what can you tell me about this watch? apparently it's a rolex tudor and that's all I know. Dude wants to sell it to me for $200.
Is it worth that?
>>11367124
goddamn it. meant to post this pic
>>11367131
>>11367124
Tudors are well made watches and a great less expensive option than other luxury brands. With a parent company like Rolex you get to trust them a bit. The main different is they don't have in house made movements, but rather swiss movements made by ETA.
I don't know that specific model, but I suggest you find out what it went for retail, and check on its condition. I can't really tell you if 200 bucks is a good deal or not since I don't know what it originally cost, but generally Tudors are great bang for your buck at full retail price, so if it's in good condition that doesn't seem like it would be a terrible deal. Search around online for people selling the same model.
>>11367230
Also, it's a tudor, not a Rolex. Don't let this guy try to play up the connection there and sell it to you as a "rolex" with a higher price tag. They're made in side by side factories, but still.
He doesn't seem like he's trying to rip you off at 200 dollars though, unless the watch is it shit condition.
>>11367230
>>11367238
Thank you buddy. I was sceptical about the association. Can't find that particular model anywhere but I'll keep looking.
>>11364402
>>11364414
>>11364446
>>11366860
>>11366981
>>11366998
>>11367102
Is it only me that finds all these 'rolexes' and 'audemars' really rather inelegant and almost crude looking, I just feel there's no grace to them and the exorbitant price tags that come attached really do baffle me. Feel free to disagree... Or not.
>>11367357
And I know not all the pictures I called upon were 'rolex' or 'audemar' watches, but you know what I mean
>>11364446
what an awful fake lol
>>11367131
100% yes if it's in good condition
Try looking at the Explorer. New model is coming out soon. Pic related
If your budget is 5k you could definitely get a whole variety of good condition Submariners. But if you're after a navy dial then definitely go for a Tudor Black Bay. Also comes in Red, Black and Bronze. You can grab one for about 3k new, just ask your local authorized dealer for a discount. Tudor is also owned by Rolex if that sways your opinion at all.
>>11367357
You linked a couple of mine. I guess it's all perspective, man. I appreciate the craftsmanship, don't find them inelegant or crude looking, and enjoy wearing the different ones I collect. It's a hobby.
It's all about taste too. I shared a lot of big bulky dive watches, but there's also thin and more "elegant" ones.
Check out the omega constellation pie pan. That's probably my favorite dress watch.
As for the price tag, it's just the kind of thing that goes along with a purely luxury item.
>>11367357
Elegance is overrated and frankly a middle-class conceit. Some watches are just cool.
I like the sinn automatic. But then again I'm big into watches. Check out the /wt/'s on /g/ for lots of impressive watches to appease normies. Plus you might find out you don't have to bust your wallet to find a great well respected watch
>>11367034
>select favorite
the two on the left and the Nomos
>>11367406
Literally how is it possible to tell that watch is fake?
I've posted a genuine Rolex before and almost always, someone calls it fake
>>11367425
fake
>>11368020
Yeah, I've had some unique opportunities in life and done some cool shit, but if I say anything about the coolest parts of my life on 4chan people just say I'm lying.
I guess the only real people here must be basement-dwelling poorfag NEETs.
>>11368095
Yeah then I get insecure and think maybe everyone who sees me with mine thinks it's fake.
>>11368139
I wouldn't worry about it as long as it looks good on you. People may be more inclined to suspect a fake with Rolex specifically, but fuck 'em if they're wrong.
>>11368150
Guess so, thanks. What about an AP?
>>11368007
thats why it's awful - if it's that obvious from a shitty photo.
the spacing and orientation on the markings/screws are all off
>>11368535
I'm comparing with pics online and can't spot a difference.
>>11368672
>>11364446
thumb rule: if it doesn't look good, it is a fake. See the difference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9jxWYRSSXM
>>11369278
It's just a low quality picture though.
>>11364446
looks fine to me
>>11369278
Its fine . thats just a shit picture
copped this at local FB buy and sell for 40 bills
It's a lucien piccard, how did I do ?
>>11364402
have you considered Panerai, if you're looking for a watch thats not too busy this could be a good option for you.
>>11371536
Not OP but Panerais are pretty big for a lot of people
>>11371518
>40 bills
meaning $40?
>>11371547
true, honestly i only like the radiomir because its not as thick at the others
>>11368027
It's actually not.
>>11371551
yes... $40
>>11371896
Rehaut too thick, bezel too thick
>>11367425
>>11364446
So have we reached something here? They are both real?
What's /fa/'s opinion of gold watches? Do you think they look nice?
>wearing watches
>2016
How does it feel to be the next generation fedora masters?
>>11372257
Only if you are older.
>>11372269
this autistic comment always pops up sooner or later
>>11364446
how do we know this is fake
Any cheap alternatives to Junghans? I'm looking at Brathwait and Skagen right now.
>>11372334
Ruhla
>>11371981
>>11372077
It is kind of a weird angle pic but its real.The AP isn't mine. Not sure if it is real.
>>11372077
ap fake, rolex real
>>11372551
How can you tell?
>>11367357
they look awful thats for sure any orient bambino version looks much classier, who wears steel bands anyways?? geesh
>>11372516
>implying you can't buy a fake box
>>11372516
nice fake box too really good work
rate?
its mirrored
>>11372737
also what bracelets should I wear with it
>>11372579
anyone whos rich enough to buy or inherit an AP is rich enough to not have a garbage camera/phone
>>11372774
eh it could be something else
one anon wanted to know where i got a $15 unbranded daniel wellington watch from.
well it finally arrived.
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Sweden-armbandsur-Design-Nylon-Watchband-Casual-Watch-Thin-Case-Quartz-Japan-Movement-Free-Shipping/1996167798.html
glass gives a greenish tinge depending on lighting.
top left is best example.
the dial hands may be plastic idk, they seem to have a strange texture compared to the hour marks. you can only tell when put your face right up to your wrist
>>11373223
here it is again wearing it in better lighting
>>11364402
Get an Omega Speedmaster Professional Man on the Fucking Moon.
https://youtu.be/_cstYM0s_mE
>>11364402
nice shirt.
>>11373227
archie is such a judgemental shit but I enjoy his videos.
W2c a legit actual 50s 60s Soviet military watch???
>>11372334
the Bauhaus line by Junkers are cheapish, around ~260 USD for a quartz, and automatic between 500-550 USD
>>11364431
A Lange Sohne > fp Journe > AP > IWC > JLC > Rolex > Omega
>>11374900
Nah, AP is in the big 3 (AP, PP, VC)
>>11374900
>IWC that high
You're literally a moron.
>>11375002
If that were true they would manufacture good looking watches.
>>11375020
Come on dude, are you serious
They are known as one of the best across the board because of the finishing of the cases and movement, along with all of their designs
seriously research before you make statements like that.
>>11374900
you dont know much about watches do you
>>11375018
>>11375301
Tourbillons made by Rolex, Omega: 0
Grand complications made by Rolex, Omega: 0
Repeaters made by Rolex, Omega: 0
Rolex don't even have display backs because they don't want real collectors seeing how shitty their movement decorations are.
>>11375355
Oh I remember when I went through this phase
>>11375355
You're so willing to bash one of the most innovative watch companies of all time, which has invented the water-resistant case, automatic movement, and date function, but where is your superior watch?
A Rolex is a tool watch. It is meant to withstand the elements and survive decades. I hope you understand this. It's like comparing a workhorse Mercedes with a rolls Royce that needs to be pampered.
>>11375296
someone thinks something you like is ugly
>do more research until you like it
hmmmm
>>11364446
I'd rather wear nothing
>>11375374
It's because he was saying AP didn't belong in the top 3 because of how they look, while completely disregarding the very high standards they are produced at
>>11375355
What watch do you wear? Show us your PP grand complications
>>11375355
At the end of the day Rolex is a tool watch company masquerading as a luxury watch company. They have no interest in fedora nonsense like what you listed.
>>11373227
This desu senpai
>>11375435
>Rolex is a tool watch company masquerading as a luxury watch company.
I agree with the tool watch aspect but they are a luxury company in all meanings of the word.
They first came into the "luxury" scene in the 80's but that doesn't mean they aren't. Branding helps with it but they really do have the product to back it up
t. Rolex owner
>>11375390
Lots of luxury brands have such high standards, and design was specifically mentioned in that post, as if researching bad design somehow makes it good.
Then again, AP got popular somehow...
>>11375464
The Royal Oak had trouble gaining traction in 1972 when it was released (because people had never seen a stainless steel luxury sports watch before) but it basically became a hit. I think a lot of people would agree that the original Royal Oak is one of the most iconic watch designs in the world and its okay to not like it, or the offshores or whatever, but that doesn't discount its place in the big 3
>>11375366
>>11375435
You mean the same two "innovative" movements that's nearly identical to millions of ETA mass produced movements that are made into sub $500 watches each year?
Rolex slapping 20k of diamonds on a 7k base oyster, then charging 60k for it doesn't put them into the category of high end horological engineering. Its like slapping some turbos and carbon fiber on a Toyota Avalon and trying to market it as a BMW 7 series.
The only reason Rolex is so well know is because the price point is within reach of the ghetto-rich so hundreds of thousands of them get sold every year to people using credit cards trying to look ghetto rich.
>>11375474
Fair enough.
>but that doesn't discount its place in the big 3
This is still kiiiiiiiinda arbitrary though.
>>11375495
>You mean the same two "innovative" movements that's nearly identical to millions of ETA mass produced movements that are made into sub $500 watches each year?
They invented it, retard.
By the way, Rolex does not "slap on" diamonds to a stainless steel case (which is incredibly well made). Diamonds can be put on aftermarket but Rolex does not put diamonds on stainless
Rolex has its own metal foundry and literally melts its own precious metals for use in its watches, and diamonds will only be put on those.
The only reason Rolex is so well know is because the price point is within reach of the ghetto-rich so hundreds of thousands of them get sold every year to people using credit cards trying to look ghetto rich.
Total bullshit statement, Rolexes have been popular for decades because of their longevity and reliability.
By the way, nobody buys a Rolex on credit and an AD will rarely discount (and it will not be much if they do). Clearly you've never owned or even held one before.
I sincerely hope you grow out of this childish kind of bashing on one of the worlds most loved and esteemed watch companies.
>>11375501
Eh from what I've heard its generally agreed upon.
>>11375495
There are many collectors that would disagree with you completely and I could write a novel on why you are wrong but I really don't feel like it right now
>>11375495
When wealthy people say they want you watch, but want more gay diamonds on it and are willing to pay, you'd be smart to take them up on the offer. The margins on diamonds for a company as big as Rolex is probably huge.
Not sure what you deem to be ghetto-rich, but the ghetto-rich I know cannot afford even a $1000 watch. By afford I mean they'd rather use that $1000 for rims 9 times out of 10.
>>11375495
So what kind of watch do you wear? Show us that Vacheron
>>11375495
Rolex movements aren't identical to ETA. Rolex uses a free sprung balance and has it's own proprietary shock protection.
>>11375571
This, plus Rolex makes all of their movements entirely by hand so....
>>11375414
I wear a 10 dollar watch and a 21000 dollar watch.
>>11375628
>defines his watches by their price and won't even say the names, given he actually owns them
I have a hard time believing you based on what you've said before
Meme watch and stealth luxury watch reporting in
Watchbump
I decided to go with Rolex Datejust II for first luxury watch. Just can't decide on the color. Which one is best and most versatile?
>>11371518
have you put the watch on a ham?
other than that the watch is gorgeous, hope you match it with a nice outfit, that for 40$ is unbelievable
