Cycling Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
Hey guys, is cycling in any way /fa/shionable?
>General biking thread
>>11287622
Everyone and literally their grandma does it here in Scandinavia, so no.
>>11287626
>Everyone wears clothes, so clothing isn't fashionable.
>>11287627
that's exactly what I was thinking
/n/ would have your tits off for all of these
I feel like it's such a toss up you get spazoid messenger posers and people just trying to get around but personally I find the aesthetic of track/ road bikes to be quite fashionable. Just wanted the input of /fa/.
>yes i'm OP
>>11287631
That looks awefully uncomfortable to ride in that big jacket. And how would he carry that bag riding. He should have left his bike at home that day maybe>>11287633
who makes /fa/ cycling apparel? rapha?
> training your leg muscles
> ruining your pants and shoes
> sweating
No, definitely no /fa/
>>11287663
Paul Smith
>>11287665
>>11287663
def not rapha
>>11287627
I didn't know you were retarded, my bad. Here in Scandinavia riding a bike, owning a bike, is like owning a phone. It doesn't really fucking matter what you have. You should have asked for /fa/ bikes if that's what you were after, not if it in itself is /fa/. Actually scratch that, that's one of those shitty underage "is __x__ effay??" retard threads.
>>11287664
physical exertion and being green can't be fashion?
>>11287675
>tko
>>11287686
Only if you live in a big city like Tokyo
>>11287622
w2c cap?
>>11287691
this is true. anywhere rural you risk poorfag syndrome.
ONLY FOLDERS
>>11287622
Dont cycle to Be fashionable. Cycle to get from AtoB, or if you enjoy it. You,l look a prick if you want to do it to be fashionable, and rightly so
>>11287648
the typical steel road/track bike form is fa but the actual stuff you posted is not.
>>11287709
>>11287725
>>11287743
>>11287673
yeah and castelli makes the cheapest products
>riding a bicycle when you could be riding a motorcycle
>>11287857
bicycles are more convenient in so many cases :)
You cant take your moped on the train for example
bikes are objectively the best way to travel on land
Where's the moulton love?
>>11287622
it's not /fa/ at all
but its how i lost a good deal of weight
just bought a cycle trainer and built a decent bike and went at it
>>11288671
retard. why would you gain weight in the first place.
>>11287664
I wonder if not being /fa/ is /fa/.
>>11287622
does it have to be /fa/?
I cycle because it gets me out of taking aggravating public transportation, it's good exercise, I see parts of the city I normally wouldn't, and I enjoy it as an activity that requires very little thought.
But all of the evidence in this thread is people who probably should not have brought their bike out that day as a fashion accessory. Also nobody is wearing a helmet. I get it, helmets and safety culture are not /fa/.
My point is. No it's not, but so what, maybe it shouldn't be. I never get why some people riding on the road got all dressed up for it. Fashion bikers are lame, if you want to bike just bike.
>>11289428
/Thread
>>11289428
everything you do needs to be /fa/
that's the goal.
