![121221[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/MZ5eaTx.jpg "121221[1].jpg")
What are some good alternative to chuck taylors?
Are they /fa/? They have been my every day shoes for almost 4 years, instead of buying another pair again I would like to try something else.
Pic related.
![Spring-Court-B2-Black-Canvas-image-2[1].jpg_v=1460727894.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/0HmKgQd.jpg "Spring-Court-B2-Black-Canvas-image-2[1].jpg_v=1460727894.jpg")
>>11284556
>>11284556
Palladiums
>>11284556
Rick Owens Ramones. Wearing mine right now.
>>11284624
This
>>11284556
>>11284605
>>11284556
>>11284621
Fucking disgusting
>>11284556
Chucks are better great imo.
>>11284789
guaranteed to make a kid run faster and jump higher
>>11284605
Those look like shit, low tops are the best.
>>11284789
whats the exact name for these?
>>11285877
are you autistic?
>>11285919
well the ones I find with the name are a bit different...
>>11284556
Have anyone tryied those chuck taylor II? Are they any good? They seem like more sturdy.
nike court royale
>>11286232
Way better than the old ones.
Higher quality material and more comfortable.
>>11285877
sandlot center hi.
>>11284556
shoes like pottery is good. Chucks aren't /fa/ but they're not bad shoes to have. Literally everyone has them, so just keep them as beaters.
>>11287421
Honestly what is the point in slp? They're a 1:1 converse rip off marked way up. You're a fashion victim if you buy this shit
>>11284556
full rick
>>11287424
is that really a valid question? Not trying to sound dickish just genuinely curious. I got mine as a gift so I can't say just looking at them I would get them, the soles are really comfortable though.
>>11287424
I guess though to answer the question, if I had the means to buy them and they didn't hurt my pocket, then why not?
>>11287441
I just don't see the point in paying almost double for something that is EXACTLY the same, and enable a company that is shameful enough to copy a famous design
>>11287501
Understandable.
>>11284826
shoes like poottery alwats
>>11287501
and on top of that, the branding is fuck ugly
>>11284750
Shoes Like Pottery are fucking pointless dude. Seriously Chuck II's look better and cost half as much. SLP has ugly branding and a retarded mark-up. I don't get why people constantly try to peddle them here, probably trying to make themselves feel better about wasting money on an inferior product.
>>11287424
>>11287711
they're vulcanized bro
Military converses, aka jungle shoes.
>>11287424
For me it is "design", oh and they're comfier too. They're only 30 more then converse so I think it's worth it. (If you like the blue sole and their design in general)
>>11287501
>almost double
They're not almost the double, they were $30 more expensive than normal chucks (at least that's the price difference in my country)
>>11287711
I don't get why you keep saying they're super expensive, they're not if you know where to buy them.
>>11287907
Kek, I like shoes like pottery but your comment is stupid. Converse are vulcanized too, almost every cheap canvas shoe is vulcanized, slp uses a different vulcanizing technique but It doesn't change anything.
>>11288492
Oh, also I like them because they're not made in a sweatshop in a shitty country. I know most people don't care but for me it was a reason to buy slp.
>>11288492
bro you don't get it, they're vulcanized
>>11288705
No, you don't get it. Every canvas shoe is vulcanized.
>>11288734
no bro, here's the thing, it's vulcanized
>>11288764
jej :)
>>11288492
W2c cheaper slp hi tops? They're expensive everywhere I look
>>11284556
There's really no alternative to Chucks unless you're a sucker for gimmicks (PF Flyers, Shoes Like Pottery) or have tons of money (Rick Owens Ramones). Palladium's canvas boots are somewhat similar and look pretty good, so check them out if you're really desperate for an alternative.
>>11288837
goodweaver.jp or va-va.jp
It depends on where you live, maybe you'll have to pay taxes (mine didn't get stopped at the customs so I didn't pay taxes).
>>11288840
>ramones
>alternative to chucks
le ramones have a white toecap and sole XDDdd they must be le convers
Ramones are not even close to a chuck taylor alternative, they are not vulcanized shoes, the proportions are very different to converse shoes, the sole is very different, they don't look good in "normie" outfits.
OP, just get any canvas shoe.
Onitsuka Tigers
We've had this thread a few days ago I'll try to find it for you.
>>11284605
these are dope af
>>11284621
disgusting
>>11284750
agree with >>11287711
>>11284789
too boxy
>>11286232
I got one of the new all white ones. They're pretty great. Definitely more comfortable.
>>11288867
>>11272817
Here you go fambalam.
