Now when the dust has settled: is it any good?
no it's fucking neon yellow mixed with black on a shoe
not just knit, any all star II
a couple worthwhile changes from the orginals but they played it very safe and thus they are a little boring
>>11248692
Is it worth buying if i'm lookig for summer shoes?
>>11248717
come on dude, youre a fucking adult, you should be able to decide this without asking a Mongolian basket weaving forum
they're converse
they're cheap shoes
they're plain
most people like them
they're reasonably priced
if youre ok with these things then buy them, if not look for something else
next time dont make a thead when you have a simple questoin, go to the cop or not thread and lurk more
This tbqhf
>>11248825
>>11248649
>that style?
no
>chuck 2s in general?
they're great
an all around improvement on the originals
>>11248649
Just get the blacks or whites. I actually removed the logo on the blacks like a faggot and laced them white so they have a similar look to ramones, even if the silhouette is completely different.
what's different about chuck ii? i'm thinking of just buying old chucks on sale instead
>>11249645
Is the logo just stitched on? I'm considering doing the same thing with a white pair.
>>11249658
Yeah. Just get one of those stitch picker things and you're good.
>>11249667
Sweet. Thanks, anon-kun.
why bother with anything else when the 70s chucks exist
>>11249652
significantly better lunarlon insole, no more black stripes anynwhere on the sole, thicker and more plasticky canvas, more accurate sizing, plastic eyelets on all models, different logo style
they probably are higher quality, will last longer and will be better for your feet than old chucks but i honestly still prefer how old chucks look a lot more
>>11249689
Pls post 70's inspo
>>11249769
watch any skate edit from the last 2 years
>>11249775
Those are normal chucks or CTAS
Haven't seen anyone skate the 70's
Is this pair effay?
I like the way they look, personally.
