[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Thought on these new Chuck Taylors?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5
File: 551528C_standard.jpg (277 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
551528C_standard.jpg
277 KB, 1000x1000
>>
Goddamn, that'd pretty cool
>>
File: M9160_standard.png (645 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
M9160_standard.png
645 KB, 1000x1000
meh. the existing ones are fine. they had the the "more worn out the better" and the "rebel but still normie shoe" vibe to them so picrelated is superior and will never really go out of style and need replacing with a newer model.
>>
>>11178758
these would have been hot 3-4 years ago but atp this look feels passe
>>
File: chuck.png (600 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
chuck.png
600 KB, 1000x1000
GOAT
>>
File: 551528C_shot4.jpg (135 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
551528C_shot4.jpg
135 KB, 1000x1000
>>
File: 551528C_shot5.jpg (159 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
551528C_shot5.jpg
159 KB, 1000x1000
>>
>>11178880
looks cool
>>
http://www.converse.com/us/en/regular/chuck-taylor-all-star-shroud/ID00185.html
>>
Meh, zip in the middle is pretty ugly imo
>>
Cool but none of you cucks could pull em off
>>
>>11178885
Das rayciss.
>>
>>11178898
This is true, I can never pull chucks off after I put them on
>>
>>11178758
Looks like converse in a cyberpunk world
>>
Converse is really stepping up their game lately, I'm almost compelled to buy some of the newer models and I used to be completely against chucks because they looked like shit and have the normie stigma.
But hell, the 2.0 models got rid of almost all the flaws and most of the tacky shit and this new one isn't bad either, kinda looks like Rick Owens had a shitty week, but that's more of a praise for this brand.
>>
>>11178758
Holy shit, that actually looks really nice and I've never been into converse. Might check it out for myself.
>>
>>11178898
Probably not because that's a woman's shoe.
Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.