Hello /fa/ I'm looking for some long sleeve tees and polos that are the same quality as Ralph Lauren but do not have logos on them. Do these even exist?
yes. if you think that ralph lauren is the height of quality, then you're a lost soul.
protip: most (almost all) higher-quality clothes have either no logo on them, or a very subtle logo. understatement is the key to menswear.
>>11122951
uniqlo
am appy
muji
i'm sure there are many others who sell them. i'm not really into polos though so i can't really compare them 4 u
>>11122951
If you like Ralph Lauren the higher end variants purple and black labels do not have logos
>>11122987
>uniqlo
>same quality as ralph
>>11122989
I doubt he can afford purple label lol
>>11123005
It's at tjmaxx a lot
>>11122951
a logo is, in and of itself, a sign of lower quality. or at least lower price/quality point.
it's just tasteless marketing, nowadays you can't fall for it!
Can someone suggest some to me?
>>11122951
Camber usa
>>11124241
>>11122951
Zara
^I'm just getting into this brand but from what I heard it supposedly has designer quality stuff
>>11125184
uh, no
>>11122951
yeh, I'm sure there is nothing in the world even close to the quality of motha fuckn polo ralph lauren. do they even exist?
>>11125184
zara quality is pretty bad actually.
and op I decided to only buy non logo stuff and so far these few brands seem good:
club monaco, jcrew, theory, filippa k, patrick assaraf
Why do you care about the logo, not having a logo doesn't make it better or worse quality or company.
>>11125287
Maybe he doesn't want to be a walking advertisement or look like a new money tryhard
Anybody know where to cop a hat like this but with no logo?
>>11125355
Fucking oops
>>11125184
It is, SLP quality with a fraction of the price.
