>>10970649
Generally better quality than zara

Less trendy then zara, need to be slightly more built to make their shit look good

Sometimes interesting tops, but generally boring

>>10970948
Worth shopping? I really enjoy what they have but no clue if what I pay for is too much for it's quality.
the shirts also fit me perfectly because /fit/

It has best stuff ever for fit guys who have money or otherwise - financially secure hot guys

>>10970968
I wasn't thrilled by the quality, own two sweaters... lost their original fit after one wash. T-shirt was okay.

This all was a while ago though. Just pay some more for a hyped up scandinavian brand kek

>>10970994
It's not even expensive.

>>10971117
could you recommend some brands then? around massimo dutti price range and good quality, dont really wanna give 100 euro for a t shirt

the sticky doesnt work

>>10970649
i have several pieces from them. I would say dont buy their actual clothes but their shoes are ok. I have some boots that are held together with glue and some vibram loafers which are doing fine after 2 years.

>>10972806
shoes seem to be the worse about them desu